General Chemistry 202-SN1-RE • CEGEP, Montreal

Revision sheet: solutions and colligative properties (202-SN1-RE)

This chapter links a measurable quantity, a temperature change or a pressure, to the NUMBER of dissolved particles. The whole difficulty comes down to two things: choosing the right concentration, molality or molarity depending on the formula, and never forgetting that electrolytes dissociate.

This sheet separates the five ways of expressing a concentration, fixes the four colligative laws with their units, and gathers the mistakes that repeat from one exam to the next, in particular on the factor ii and on the sign of the freezing-point depression. It is written for CEGEP students in General Chemistry, 202-SN1-RE (formerly 202-NYA), and it also prepares the colligative part of 202-SN2-RE.

Mark this sheet as read or add it to your favourites: a free account, no password, keeps your read sheets and favourites from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the method or exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.

The thread of the chapter

A colligative property does not count grams or even moles of solute: it counts PARTICLES. That is why a mole of salt does twice the work of a mole of sugar, and why the factor ii decides everything.

This chapter is part of 202-SN1-RE, General Chemistry

The essentials

Five concentrations, and when each is used

  • • Molarity C=nVsolutionC=\dfrac{n}{V_{solution}} in mol/L. It DEPENDS on temperature, since the volume expands. It is used for stoichiometry and osmosis.
  • • Molality b=nmsolventb=\dfrac{n}{m_{solvent}} in mol/kg, on the mass of the SOLVENT alone. Independent of temperature, it is used for freezing-point depression and boiling-point elevation.
  • • Mass percent =msolutemSOLUTION×100=\dfrac{m_{solute}}{m_{SOLUTION}}\times 100, on the total mass, never on that of the solvent.
  • • Mole fraction xi=nintotalx_{i}=\dfrac{n_{i}}{n_{total}}, without units, used by Raoult's law.
  • • Parts per million: for a dilute aqueous solution, 11 ppm =1=1 mg/L. Dilution: C1V1=C2V2C_{1}V_{1}=C_{2}V_{2}.
calibration mark1.00 L of SOLUTIONmolarity: C = n / V(solution)1.000 kgwater, before the solute1.000 kg of SOLVENTmolality: b = n / m(solvent)
Molarity relates to the volume of the SOLUTION, made up to the calibration mark; molality relates to the mass of the SOLVENT alone, weighed before the solute is added.

Molarity and molality are numerically close in DILUTE aqueous solution, since a litre of water weighs a kilogram. The gap becomes large as soon as the solution is concentrated, and that is precisely where exam exercises are set.

The four colligative laws

  • • Freezing-point depression: ΔTf=i Kf b\Delta T_{f}=i\,K_{f}\,b, with Kf=1.86K_{f}=1.86 °C·kg/mol for water. The freezing temperature DECREASES: Tf=0−ΔTfT_{f}=0-\Delta T_{f}.
  • • Boiling-point elevation: ΔTb=i Kb b\Delta T_{b}=i\,K_{b}\,b, with Kb=0.512K_{b}=0.512 °C·kg/mol. The boiling temperature INCREASES.
  • • Osmotic pressure: π=i C R T\pi=i\,C\,R\,T, with CC in mol/L, R=8.314R=8.314 kPa·L/(mol·K) and TT in kelvins.
  • • Raoult's law: Psolution=xSOLVENT P∘P_{solution}=x_{SOLVENT}\,P^{\circ}, so the lowering is ΔP=xsolute P∘\Delta P=x_{solute}\,P^{\circ}.
  • • van't Hoff factor ii: number of particles released per formula unit. 11 for a nonelectrolyte, 22 for NaClNaCl, 33 for CaCl2CaCl_{2}.
−3−2−101pure water: 0 °Csolution: −1.86 °CΔTf = 1.86 °Cfreezing99100101102103pure water: 100 °Csolution: 100.51 °CΔTb = 0.51 °Cboilingglucose at 1.00 mol/kg in water, 1 cm per degree on both scales
Same solution, same scale: the freezing point drops by 1.86 °C, the boiling point rises by only 0.51 °C. The two changes are in the ratio Kf/Kb=3.6K_{f}/K_{b}=3.6.

MEASURED values of ii are always a little below the theoretical values, because of ion pairing in solution. The gap grows with concentration and with the charge of the ions.

Solubility: what makes it rise and what makes it drop

  • • Like dissolves like: an ionic or polar solute needs a polar solvent, a nonpolar solute a nonpolar solvent.
  • • For most SOLIDS, solubility INCREASES with temperature: this is what makes recrystallization possible.
  • • For GASES, solubility DECREASES with temperature, and increases with pressure: S=kHPS=k_{H}P, Henry's law.
  • • A saturated solution is at equilibrium with the undissolved solute: adding more solute no longer increases the concentration.
  • • Recrystallization: dissolve in the MINIMUM volume of boiling solvent, then cool slowly. You recover the starting mass minus what the cold solution still holds.
02040608010050100150200250T (°C)KNO₃ (g per 100 g of water)010203040481216T (°C)dissolved O₂ (mg/L)a solid: solubility RISESa gas: solubility FALLS
Two reference points, each in its own unit: the solubility of potassium nitrate climbs with temperature, that of dissolved oxygen drops. No single rule covers both cases.

The opposite behaviour of solids and gases explains two everyday facts: warm water holds less oxygen, which threatens fish in summer, and a lukewarm soft drink foams as soon as it is opened.

The mistakes that cost marks

These are the errors I correct most often in session. Each one costs marks on a paper, even when the reasoning behind it is right.

1. Using molarity in a formula that requires molality

3 points, and an error that grows with concentration

What not to write

“The solution is 2.002.00 mol/L, so ΔTf=1.86×2.00=3.72\Delta T_{f}=1.86\times 2.00=3.72 °C.”

What to write

“Freezing-point depression uses MOLALITY, in moles per kilogram of SOLVENT. You must first convert from molarity to molality, which requires the density of the solution.”

Why: Colligative laws compare states at different temperatures, yet molarity changes with temperature since the volume expands. Only molality, defined on masses, stays constant.

2. Forgetting the van't Hoff factor for an electrolyte

the whole question, 5 points

What not to write

“1.001.00 mol/kg of sodium chloride lowers the freezing point by 1.861.86 °C.”

What to write

“NaClNaCl releases TWO ions per formula unit, so i=2i=2 and ΔTf=2×1.86×1.00=3.72\Delta T_{f}=2\times 1.86\times 1.00=3.72 °C.”

1.86 °Cglucosei = 13.72 °CNaCli = 25.58 °CCaCl₂i = 3no iΔTf at the same molality, 1.00 mol/kg
At the SAME molality of 1.001.00 mol/kg, the depression doubles with salt and triples with calcium chloride. It is not the dissolved mass that counts, it is the number of particles released.

Why: A colligative property depends only on the NUMBER of dissolved particles, not on their nature. Dissolving a mole of salt amounts to dissolving two moles of independent particles.

3. Calculating molality on the mass of the solution

2 points, and a 14%14\% error here

What not to write

“250250 g of solute in 1.501.50 kg of water: the molality is n1.75\dfrac{n}{1.75}.”

What to write

“Molality is calculated on the mass of the SOLVENT alone: n1.50\dfrac{n}{1.50}. It is the mass percent that uses the mass of the solution.”

water (solvent): 1.50 kg250 gmolality: n ÷ 1.50 kg of solventn ÷ 1.75 kg of solution: wrong
Molality divides by the mass of the SOLVENT alone, in green. The mass of the solution, in red, also contains the solute and gives a molality that is 14%14\% too small.

Why: Molality measures how many particles there are for a fixed amount of solvent. Including the solute in it would make the quantity nonadditive and cost it its independence from temperature.

4. Adding the freezing-point depression instead of subtracting it

2 points, and a physical nonsense

What not to write

“ΔTf=4.99\Delta T_{f}=4.99 °C, so the solution freezes at +4.99+4.99 °C.”

What to write

“The freezing temperature DROPS: Tf=0−4.99=−4.99T_{f}=0-4.99=-4.99 °C. It is the boiling point that rises.”

−6−4−20246pure water: 0 °Csolution: −4.99 °C+4.99 °C: wrongsubtract ΔTf
The solute makes the freezing point DROP: from 0 °C, we subtract ΔTf\Delta T_{f}. The red dot, above zero, is a lost sign.

Why: An antifreeze that made water freeze at +5+5 °C would be a coolant. The solute interferes with the organization of the crystal, so you must cool MORE to freeze.

5. Using the mole fraction of the solute in Raoult's law

3 points

What not to write

“xsolute=0.12x_{solute}=0.12 and P∘=3.17P^{\circ}=3.17 kPa, so Psolution=0.12×3.17=0.38P_{solution}=0.12\times 3.17=0.38 kPa.”

What to write

“Psolution=xSOLVENTP∘=0.88×3.17=2.79P_{solution}=x_{SOLVENT}P^{\circ}=0.88\times 3.17=2.79 kPa. The fraction of the solute gives the LOWERING, 0.380.38 kPa, not the final pressure.”

P° = 3.17 kPa (pure water)P(solution) = x(solvent) P°0.88 × 3.17 = 2.79 kPaΔP = 0.12 × 3.17 = 0.38 kPawrong:P(solution) = 0.38 kPa
The vapour pressure of the solution is the share of the SOLVENT, 88%88\% of P∘P^{\circ}. The share of the solute, 12%12\%, is the lowering: mistaken for the final pressure, it gives the red bar.

Why: For a nonvolatile solute, only the solvent evaporates. The vapour pressure of the solution is therefore proportional to the proportion of solvent at the surface, not to that of the solute.

6. Forgetting kelvins or the factor ii in the osmotic pressure

the whole question, 5 points

What not to write

“π=CRT=0.150×8.314×37=46.1\pi=CRT=0.150\times 8.314\times 37=46.1 kPa for a sodium chloride solution at 3737 °C.”

What to write

“T=310T=310 K and i=2i=2: π=2×0.150×8.314×310=773\pi=2\times 0.150\times 8.314\times 310=773 kPa.”

pure solventsolutionmembranethe solution risesπ = i C R T
The solvent crosses the membrane toward the solution, whose level rises until the hydrostatic pressure compensates: it is this equilibrium pressure that π\pi measures.

Why: The formula is modelled on that of ideal gases: it therefore requires kelvins. And like every colligative law, it counts particles, so it carries the factor ii.

7. Believing that the solubility of a gas increases with temperature

3 points on the reasoning question

What not to write

“As with sugar, hot water dissolves more carbon dioxide than cold water.”

What to write

“It is the OPPOSITE for gases: their solubility DECREASES as temperature rises. Warm water holds less oxygen, and a lukewarm soft drink goes flat when opened.”

water at 5 °Cwater at 40 °Csame gas, same pressure above the waterthe gas escapesdissolved CO₂: grey dots
When hot, the water holds LESS dissolved gas and the bubbles leave the beaker on the right: the opposite of sugar, which is more soluble when hot.

Why: Dissolving a gas releases energy, so heating shifts the equilibrium in the direction of release, in accordance with Le Chatelier's principle. For most solids, dissolution is on the contrary endothermic.

8. Taking the measured van't Hoff factor for the theoretical value

2 points on the commentary question

What not to write

“ii is exactly 22 for sodium chloride, whatever the concentration.”

What to write

“The MEASURED value is always a little lower, for example 1.871.87 at 0.10.1 mol/kg: some of the ions remain paired in solution.”

+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−+−in theory: 30 particlesi = 30 / 15 = 2measured: 2 pairs, 28 particlesi = 28 / 15 = 1.8715 NaCl units dissolved; Na⁺ (+), Cl⁻ (−), ion pair circled
Two ion pairs among fifteen units count as only one particle each: 2828 particles instead of 3030, so i=1.87i=1.87 and not 22.

Why: Oppositely charged ions attract each other and form transient pairs that behave as a single particle. The gap grows with concentration and with the charge of the ions, which puts CaCl2CaCl_{2} further from its theoretical ii than NaClNaCl.

9. Dividing by the mass of the solvent in a mass percent

2 points

What not to write

“2525 g of solute in 100100 g of water make a 25%25\% solution by mass.”

What to write

“Mass percent relates to the mass of the SOLUTION: 25125×100=20.0%\dfrac{25}{125}\times 100=20.0\%.”

water: 100 g25 g25 ÷ 125 g of solution: 20.0 %25 ÷ 100 g of water: 25 %, wrong
Mass percent divides by the mass of the SOLUTION, 125125 g, in green. Dividing by the 100100 g of water, in red, gives 25%25\% instead of 20.0%20.0\%.

Why: Mass percent describes the composition of the liquid in the beaker, which weighs the sum of the two. Molality, for its part, makes the opposite choice and relates to the solvent alone.

10. Mixing units in a dilution

2 points, and a factor of 10001000

What not to write

“C1V1=C2V2C_{1}V_{1}=C_{2}V_{2} with V1=25V_{1}=25 mL and V2=0.500V_{2}=0.500 L.”

What to write

“Both volumes must be in the SAME unit: V1=0.025V_{1}=0.025 L and V2=0.500V_{2}=0.500 L, or else 2525 mL and 500500 mL.”

Why: The dilution relation is a ratio: it tolerates any volume unit, provided it is the same on both sides. It is the mixing that breaks it.

Which method to choose

Which concentration to use

The formula the concentration is going into

  • If freezing-point depression or boiling-point elevation → MOLALITY, in mol per kg of solvent

    Example: ΔTf=i Kf b\Delta T_{f}=i\,K_{f}\,b

  • If osmotic pressure → MOLARITY, in mol/L of solution

    Example: π=i C R T\pi=i\,C\,R\,T

  • If Raoult's law or vapour pressure lowering → MOLE FRACTION, that of the solvent for the pressure, that of the solute for the lowering

    Example: P=xsolventP∘P=x_{solvent}P^{\circ}

  • If titration, dilution, stoichiometry in solution → MOLARITY, with n=CVn=CV and VV in litres

    Example: C1V1=C2V2C_{1}V_{1}=C_{2}V_{2}

  • If the problem gives a density of the solution → it is the signal that you will have to convert from one concentration to another

    without a density, you cannot convert a molarity into a molality

A density that is given and not used almost always signals a forgotten conversion between molarity and molality. It is the most reliable clue in the chapter.

Which factor ii to write

The nature of the solute

C₆H₁₂O₆(s)i = 1NaCl(s)i = 2CaCl₂(s)i = 3HA, weak acidi barely > 1C₆H₁₂O₆Na⁺Cl⁻Ca²⁺Cl⁻Cl⁻HAHAHAH⁺A⁻
We count the particles that ONE formula unit releases: a neutral molecule stays whole, a salt separates into all its ions, a weak acid ionizes only in small part.
  • If neutral organic molecule: glucose, urea, glycerol, ethylene glycol, sucrose → i=1i=1

    Example: radiator antifreeze

  • If binary salt of the type NaClNaCl, KBrKBr, MgSO4MgSO_{4} → i=2i=2

    Example: road salt

  • If salt of the type CaCl2CaCl_{2}, Na2SO4Na_{2}SO_{4}, K2CO3K_{2}CO_{3} → i=3i=3

    Example: calcium chloride, more effective per unit mass

  • If STRONG acid or STRONG base → complete dissociation, so ii equals the number of ions produced

    Example: HClHCl gives i=2i=2

  • If WEAK acid or WEAK base → ii between 11 and the number of ions, to be calculated with the degree of ionization

    a weak acid ionized at 5%5\% gives i=1.05i=1.05

Comparing two solutes at equal MASS and at equal MOLALITY does not give the same ranking: the molar mass comes into play in the first case, only the factor ii in the second. Read what the problem fixes.

How the answer is expected to be written

A marker ticks steps. Here they are in order, with the concluding sentence expected word for word.

Solving a complete colligative problem

When to use it: The problem gives a mass of solute and a mass of solvent, and asks for a freezing temperature, a boiling temperature or a molar mass.

  1. 1 Convert the mass of solute to moles using its molar mass, writing the unit.
  2. 2 Calculate the molality by dividing by the mass of SOLVENT in kilograms, and say so explicitly.
  3. 3 Determine the factor ii, justifying it in one sentence: nonelectrolyte, binary salt, ternary salt.
  4. 4 Apply ΔT=i K b\Delta T=i\,K\,b, then deduce the final temperature by SUBTRACTING for freezing and ADDING for boiling.
  5. 5 Conclude with the two temperatures and comment on how plausible the result is.

Concluding sentence

“The molality is 4.031.50=2.69\dfrac{4.03}{1.50}=2.69 mol/kg; ethylene glycol being a nonelectrolyte, i=1i=1, so ΔTf=1.86×2.69=4.99\Delta T_{f}=1.86\times 2.69=4.99 °C and the solution freezes at −4.99-4.99 °C.”

The trap: Writing ΔT\Delta T as the final answer. The question almost always asks for the TEMPERATURE, which still requires a subtraction or an addition, and this last step is worth a mark.

Marking: Typically 1 mark for the moles, 2 for the molality, 1 for the justified factor ii, 2 for the temperature change, 1 for the final temperature.

Determining a molar mass by osmometry

When to use it: The problem gives a mass of macromolecule, a volume of solution and a measured osmotic pressure.

  1. 1 Convert the temperature to kelvins and the pressure to a unit consistent with RR.
  2. 2 Isolate the concentration: C=πiRTC=\dfrac{\pi}{iRT}, justifying that i=1i=1 for a nonionic macromolecule.
  3. 3 Deduce the amount n=CVn=CV, with VV in litres.
  4. 4 Calculate M=mnM=\dfrac{m}{n} and check that the order of magnitude suits a macromolecule, that is, several tens of thousands of grams per mole.

Concluding sentence

“The concentration is C=πRTC=\dfrac{\pi}{RT}, hence n=CVn=CV and M=mnM=\dfrac{m}{n}, a molar mass of the order of 10410^{4} g/mol, consistent with a protein.”

The trap: Using freezing-point depression for a macromolecule. The depression would be of the order of a thousandth of a degree, so unmeasurable: that is precisely why osmometry exists.

Check before you hand in

Five minutes of checking recover more marks than one more problem started in a hurry.

The typical problem, taken apart

Radiator antifreeze, compared with road salt

250250 g of ethylene glycol (M=62.07M=62.07 g/mol, nonelectrolyte) is dissolved in 1.501.50 kg of water. Determine the molality of the solution, its freezing temperature and its boiling temperature.

What mass of sodium chloride (M=58.44M=58.44 g/mol) would have to be dissolved in the same mass of water to obtain the SAME freezing-point depression? Comment.

Data: Kf=1.86K_{f}=1.86 °C·kg/mol, Kb=0.512K_{b}=0.512 °C·kg/mol.

250 g of ethylene glycolin 1.50 kg of waterNaCl: m = ?m = ? of sodium chloridein 1.50 kg of watersame ΔTf
Two solutions in the same mass of water: we look for the mass of salt that gives the SAME depression as the 250250 g of glycol.

Step 1

n(glycol)=25062.07=4.03n(\text{glycol})=\dfrac{250}{62.07}=4.03 mol.

Why

We leave grams on the very first line, as in the whole previous chapter. Colligative laws only know amounts of substance.

Step 2

Molality: b=4.031.50=2.69b=\dfrac{4.03}{1.50}=2.69 mol/kg, the mass of 1.501.50 kg being that of the SOLVENT alone.

Why

Explicitly mentioning the solvent alone is worth a mark and avoids the error of dividing by 1.751.75 kg, the mass of the complete solution.

Step 3

Ethylene glycol is a neutral molecule that does not dissociate: i=1i=1.

Why

The factor ii is justified, not asserted. Here the justification takes five words, but it separates a complete answer from one that guessed.

Step 4

ΔTf=i Kf b=1×1.86×2.69=4.99\Delta T_{f}=i\,K_{f}\,b=1\times 1.86\times 2.69=4.99 °C, so Tf=0−4.99=−4.99T_{f}=0-4.99=-4.99 °C.

Why

The change is not the answer: the question asks for the temperature. Going from one to the other is a subtraction, and it is the exact place where answers stop too early.

Step 5

ΔTb=1×0.512×2.69=1.38\Delta T_{b}=1\times 0.512\times 2.69=1.38 °C, so Tb=100+1.38=101.38T_{b}=100+1.38=101.38 °C.

Why

Same molality, same factor ii, but a constant almost four times smaller and an opposite sign: a reminder that the two effects are not symmetrical.

Step 6

For the salt, i=2i=2, so the molality needed is b=4.992×1.86=1.34b=\dfrac{4.99}{2\times 1.86}=1.34 mol/kg, that is n=1.34×1.50=2.01n=1.34\times 1.50=2.01 mol and m=2.01×58.44=118m=2.01\times 58.44=118 g.

Why

The factor 22 halves the molality needed, and the lower molar mass reduces it again. Salt is therefore doubly more effective, per unit mass, than glycol.

Step 7

Comparison: 118118 g of salt does the work of 250250 g of glycol, half the mass for the same effect.

Why

This is the conclusion the question expects: the ranking of solutes follows neither the mass nor the molar mass alone, but the product of the factor ii and the number of moles.

Step 8

Comment: glycol is nevertheless used in radiators, because the ions of salt corrode the metals of the circuit, and salt is used on roads, where contact with the metal is brief.

Why

Colligative chemistry says what is most effective, it does not say what is usable. This nuance is almost always the last mark of the question.

Step 9

Check: ΔTfΔTb=4.991.38=3.62\dfrac{\Delta T_{f}}{\Delta T_{b}}=\dfrac{4.99}{1.38}=3.62, to compare with KfKb=1.860.512=3.63\dfrac{K_{f}}{K_{b}}=\dfrac{1.86}{0.512}=3.63.

Why

This ratio depends neither on the molality nor on the solute: it therefore checks both calculations at once, without redoing any multiplication.

The conclusion, written out

“The glycol solution is 2.692.69 mol/kg: it freezes at −4.99-4.99 °C and boils at 101.4101.4 °C. The same freezing-point depression would be obtained with only 118118 g of sodium chloride, half the mass, because salt releases two particles per formula unit.”

The classic mistake on this problem: Dividing by 1.751.75 kg, the mass of the solution, instead of 1.501.50 kg. We get b=2.30b=2.30 mol/kg and a freezing point of −4.28-4.28 °C: the 0.70.7 °C difference is small enough not to raise alarm and large enough to cost the whole question.

Learn by heart

  • • Molality b=nmSOLVENTb=\dfrac{n}{m_{SOLVENT}} in mol/kg: freezing-point depression and boiling-point elevation. Molarity C=nVSOLUTIONC=\dfrac{n}{V_{SOLUTION}}: osmosis and titrations.
  • • Mass percent on the mass of the SOLUTION; molality on the mass of the SOLVENT.
  • • ΔTf=i Kf b\Delta T_{f}=i\,K_{f}\,b with Kf=1.86K_{f}=1.86; the freezing point DROPS.
  • • ΔTb=i Kb b\Delta T_{b}=i\,K_{b}\,b with Kb=0.512K_{b}=0.512; the boiling point RISES.
  • • π=i C R T\pi=i\,C\,R\,T, with TT in KELVINS and CC in mol/L.
  • • Raoult: P=xSOLVENTP∘P=x_{SOLVENT}P^{\circ}, and ΔP=xsoluteP∘\Delta P=x_{solute}P^{\circ}.
  • • i=1i=1 nonelectrolyte, 22 for NaClNaCl, 33 for CaCl2CaCl_{2}; measured values are a little lower.
  • • Solids: solubility that RISES with TT. Gases: solubility that FALLS with TT and rises with PP.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between molarity and molality?

Molarity is the number of moles of solute per litre of solution; it changes with temperature, since the volume expands. Molality is the number of moles per kilogram of solvent alone; it does not depend on temperature. That is why the freezing-point and boiling-point laws use molality.

Why does salt lower the freezing point twice as much as sugar?

Because a colligative property counts only the number of dissolved particles. A mole of sugar gives a mole of molecules, whereas a mole of sodium chloride dissociates into two moles of ions. The van't Hoff factor expresses exactly this, and it is one for sugar against two for salt.

Does the freezing point go up or down when a solute is added?

It goes down, always. The solute interferes with the organization of solvent molecules into a crystal, so you must cool more to freeze. The boiling point, for its part, goes up. The two effects have the same mechanism but opposite signs, and for water the first is about four times stronger than the second.

How do I choose between Raoult's law and freezing-point depression?

Look at the quantity asked for. If it is a vapour pressure, it is Raoult's law and you need a mole fraction. If it is a freezing or boiling temperature, the laws are freezing-point depression and boiling-point elevation and you need a molality. If it is an osmotic pressure, you need a molarity and kelvins.

Why does the solubility of a gas decrease when it is heated?

Because dissolving a gas releases energy. Heating therefore shifts the equilibrium in the direction of release, in accordance with Le Chatelier's principle. This is the opposite of most solids, whose dissolution absorbs energy. Warm water thus holds less oxygen, which threatens fish in summer.

Why is the measured van't Hoff factor lower than the theoretical value?

Because in solution, some of the oppositely charged ions remain paired and behave as a single particle. The effective number of independent particles is therefore a little smaller than predicted. The gap grows as the concentration increases and as the charges of the ions get larger.

Practise it

Corrected exercises: Solutions and colligative properties, 202-SN1-RE

A method is proved on a paper, not on a sheet. The set for the same chapter takes each of these traps into a problem, with the solution written out step by step.

  • 10 corrected exercises
  • 100 points
  • 150 minutes
Do the exercises
Something missing from this sheet? A method, a trap, an exercise to practise it, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.

Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space. Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.

What is it about?
I read every request myself, nobody else sees it. No need to write your name or your school.
When your request is dealt with, you hear about it by email and in your space.

By sending, you agree that I read your request to answer it. It is kept with your account, erased with it, and never published: privacy policy.

Previous sheet Metals, nonmetals and metalloids Next sheet Thermochemistry and the first law

© Ahmed Squalli Houssaini. Revision sheet published at www.letuteurscientifique.ca/en/fiches/cegep-chem-sn1-solutions. Free for personal and classroom use; republishing it elsewhere requires written permission (legal notice).

See also

Looking for a 202-SN1-RE chemistry tutor in Montreal?

Get in touch for a first session. On solutions, the first job is to choose the right concentration and spot the electrolytes: the formulas themselves can be learned in five minutes.

Site by Studio Squalli