Montreal, Quebec curriculum, Secondary 5
Tutor in Culture, societe et technique (CST) mathematics for Secondary 5 in Montreal, with more than 10 years of experience. CST 5 is the most disorienting syllabus of the Quebec secondary curriculum: graph theory, financial mathematics, voting procedures, optimisation. Chapters the student has never seen, that no Secondary 4 textbook announces, and on which almost no serious free resource exists. I cover the whole of it. Sessions in English or in French.
Worth knowing if your child has carried a "not good at maths" label since Secondary 3: CST 5 breaks with everything before it. Graph theory, compound interest and voting procedures are new to everybody in the room. Nobody has a head start, the vocabulary is fresh for all, and reasoning counts for more than algebraic technique.
I have seen students who never got past 65 percent make dramatic recoveries on the graphs and financial mathematics blocks. The flip side: because the chapters are new, there is nothing familiar to fall back on, and a two week absence is genuinely hard to recover.
In the Sciences naturelles sequence, Secondary 5 continues Secondary 4: more functions, harder algebra, obvious continuity. In CST, the break is sharp. The student arrives in September and meets subjects unlike anything since primary school: colouring a graph to build an exam timetable, working out what a credit card balance actually costs, comparing six ways of counting the same ballot.
That break is good news for many students. A student carrying a reputation for being bad at mathematics since Secondary 3 finds themselves in front of a chapter where nobody has an advantage, where the vocabulary is new for everyone, and where reasoning matters more than algebraic technique.
It has a downside too. Because the chapters are new, there is nothing known to lean on, and a two week absence is hard to make up. And because CST 5 is barely taught outside Quebec, there is almost nothing available online: the corrected exercises listed below fill exactly that gap.
A geometry block is added: the cosine law, solving general triangles, equivalent figures and solids. Coverage varies slightly from school to school.
In French
All 7 chapters of the Secondary 5 CST syllabus have their own corrected exercise set and revision sheet, free and with no sign-up. Each set is in the format of an evaluation, ten questions marked out of 100, a first part on the fundamentals and a second at year-end examination level, with the full reasoning for every question. The revision sheet puts a number of marks on each mistake and gives the exact sentence to write. Written in French, which is the language of your child's exam.
The geometry and optimisation chapters are shared between CST and the Sciences naturelles sequence: the set is then the same one, and it suits both.
The errors in this syllabus are almost never arithmetic. They come from the question asking one thing and the student solving another, very close to it.
A snow clearing route covers every street, therefore every edge: that is an Eulerian problem. A delivery route visits every customer, therefore every vertex: that is a Hamiltonian problem. The two questions read alike, the two methods have nothing in common, and picking the wrong family costs the whole question.
A rate of 6 percent compounded monthly is not 6 percent per month. You must divide the rate by the number of periods and multiply the duration by the same number. Forgetting either half is the most common error of the chapter, and it produces a plausible answer, so it survives a re-read.
A probability compares favourable cases to the total; odds in favour compare favourable cases to unfavourable ones. Three to one on and a probability of three quarters do not describe the same situation. Exam questions cheerfully use both phrasings in the same problem.
The same ballot elects three different people depending on whether it is counted by plurality, by elimination or by the Borda method. An answer that announces a winner without saying which procedure produced them is worth nothing, even when the name is the right one.
Each of these traps is priced in marks, with the sentence to write instead, in the revision sheet of the corresponding chapter.
See all revision sheets, in French →There is no Ministry examination in Secondary 5 mathematics: the provincial paper is written in Secondary 4, one version per sequence. In Secondary 5 the grade comes entirely from the school, which does not make it less important, quite the reverse: it rests on local assessments, therefore on genuine command of the chapters across the year rather than on one day's performance.
A great many CEGEP programs require Secondary 5 CST mathematics as a prerequisite, notably social science without mathematics and many technical programs. Others require no Secondary 5 mathematics at all. The exact prerequisite varies by CEGEP and by program, and it must be checked in the admission guide of the program concerned, never by hearsay or by what a friend heard.
Concretely: a student aiming at a specific technical program should verify the prerequisite in the autumn of Secondary 5, not when filling in the application in March. It is one of the first things I check with families once the CEGEP goal is known.
This is the move that decides the grade in CST 5. Eulerian or Hamiltonian, simple or compound interest, probability or odds: once the family is recognised, the method follows by itself.
Nobody has a head start on graphs or voting procedures. A student who has struggled for years starts level with everyone else, and that is often where confidence comes back.
Financial mathematics needs powers and logarithms, and rounding too early in the calculation throws the answer out by several dollars. We work exact handling on the student's own calculator, TI or Casio.
Naming the voting procedure used, citing the degree criterion, announcing the optimal vertex of the feasible region: short sentences that earn marks and that students systematically forget unless they have written them once in a session.
The student can message me between sessions with any question. It is part of the rate, at no extra charge.
Chapters that exist nowhere else in the Quebec curriculum: graph theory, financial mathematics, voting procedures from social choice theory, optimisation by linear programming, probability with expected value, and a geometry block on equivalent figures and solids. It is more concrete than Secondary 4, and many students feel markedly more at ease.
No. The Ministry mathematics examination is written in Secondary 4, one version per sequence. In Secondary 5 the grade comes entirely from the school. That does not make the year less important: it is the grade several CEGEPs read at admission.
Many programs require it, notably social science without mathematics and many technical programs, while others require no Secondary 5 mathematics at all. The exact prerequisite varies by CEGEP and by program and must be checked in the admission guide. The secondary school diploma itself is satisfied by Secondary 4 mathematics.
Because the CST sequence aims to equip a citizen rather than prepare for pure science. A graph models a snow clearing route, a conflict-free exam timetable or the critical path of a project. Voting procedures show that six counting methods on the same ballot can elect three different people. Directly applicable mathematics, which many students find more motivating than Secondary 4 algebra.
Yes, free and complete, solutions included, listed above. Graph theory, financial mathematics, probability and expected value, voting procedures, linear programming, solving triangles and equivalent solids all have their set and their revision sheet. They are written in French.
Get in touch for a first session. I adapt to the level, the course plan and the goals of the student, including when the aim is to meet the prerequisite of a specific CEGEP program.