Exercise 0.1: Integrating by parts: ten direct calculations
For each definite integral, integrate by parts, once or several times, then give its exact value and its value to three decimal places.
One method for all ten lines: choose in the LIATE order (logarithmic, inverse trigonometric, algebraic, trigonometric, exponential) and take everything else as , included; compute and ; write and evaluate the boundary term right away. If the new integral still resists, start again with the SAME kind of choice.
- a) .
- b) .
- c) .
- d) .
- e) .
- f) .
- g) .
- h) .
- i) .
- j) .
Show the solution
Answers
- a)
- b)
- c)
- d)
- e)
- f)
- g)
- h)
- i)
- j)
The move that decides everything: the choice of . You differentiate what SIMPLIFIES when differentiated (a logarithm, an arcsine, a power of ), and you integrate what does not get more complicated (an exponential, a sine, a ). LIATE is only the order of that preference, and a bad choice does not give a wrong result: it gives an integral worse than the one you started with.
, , so and : . Pitfall: taking ; an antiderivative of carries the factor .
, , : . Pitfall: the double minus sign, the one in and the one in the formula, which gives a PLUS in front of the remaining integral.
The logarithm comes first: , , , . So . Pitfall: would force you to integrate , and the integral would stay just as hard.
, , : . The boundary term equals , since and ; the remaining integral equals . So the value is . Pitfall: forgetting the boundary term, which gives , a negative integral of a positive function.
The invisible factor : , , , and . So , the remaining integral being done with .
Two rounds. , : . Then , : . So the value is . Pitfall: in the second round, , whose sign changes the sign of the remaining integral.
Tabular method: differentiate down to zero (, , , ), integrate as many times, and alternate the signs , , , . So , and . Pitfall: the lower limit does not give , but .
, , , : . Second round: . So the value is .
, , : . Pitfall: , and the minus sign of the formula turns it into a plus.
Cyclic case. With , , : . With , the SAME choice: . So , that is . Pitfall: switching the choice in the second round, which brings back the identity .
Check: every antiderivative can be checked by differentiating it with the product rule, and every value on a calculator with a fine Riemann sum; a negative integral of a positive function, as in d) without the boundary term, signals a sign error.
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.