This is the corrected exercise set on partial fraction decomposition for Integral Calculus, 201-SN3-RE (formerly 201-NYB): polynomial long division, simple poles, repeated linear factors and irreducible quadratic factors. It is a chapter of pure algebra: nothing is integrated yet, the ground is being prepared. Part A sets up the four basic moves: polynomial long division, reading the denominator, equating coefficients and the cover-up method. Part B moves on to the cases that cost marks: the repeated factor, the irreducible quadratic, the form given without computation, then the two applications that justify the whole chapter, antiderivatives and the logistic model.
The thread of the set, repeated from one exercise to the next: THE DENOMINATOR IS IN CHARGE. Its factorization alone decides how many terms there are and what they look like; the numerator then only fixes coefficients. Three reflexes follow from this: divide as long as the numerator is too big, compute the discriminant of every quadratic BEFORE writing anything, and count the unknowns, whose number must equal the degree of the denominator.
This set is written for CEGEP students in the Science program (Sciences de la nature) who are starting integration techniques. It is here that partial fractions become a general method rather than a trick for one fraction at a time. The six figures go with the long division layout, the graph of the two poles, the chart of forms, the area to compute and the epidemic data.
Part C is pure practice, written in the format of the worksheets handed out in class: an instruction, a list of functions to decompose, and the full solution below. Its thirty-one fractions are sorted by the shape of the denominator and cover every case of the chapter, from a denominator of degree 1 to one of degree 7, with every combination of numerator degrees. A table opens exercise 11 and sends each shape of denominator to the exercise that works on it.
Self-checking setType your answers and check them question by question: the page tells you right or wrong before you open the solution. With an account, every answer right on the first try earns points, and your right answers stay filled in when you come back.
•DIVIDE FIRST: if deg(A)≥deg(B), no decomposition exists in the expected form. Divide, get BA=Q+BR with deg(R)<deg(B), and decompose BR.
•THE DISCRIMINANT BEFORE THE FORM: a quadratic in the denominator gives a term ax2+bx+cBx+C only if Δ<0. If Δ≥0, it factors and gives one or two terms with constant numerators.
•REPEATED FACTOR: (x−a)m opens m terms, x−aA1+⋯+(x−a)mAm. Likewise an irreducible (ax2+bx+c)m opens m terms with linear numerators.
•COUNTING UNKNOWNS: the total number of unknowns equals the DEGREE of the denominator. It is the fastest check that a form is correct.
•THE COVER-UP METHOD: for a simple pole a, cover (x−a) in the denominator and evaluate what is left at a. It also reaches the highest power of a repeated factor, but never the intermediate powers nor an irreducible factor.
•CONVENIENT VALUES: once the easy coefficients are found, giving x simple values (0, 1, −1) supplies the missing equations faster than equating every coefficient.
•UNIQUENESS: the decomposition exists and is unique. Two different forms of the same result are therefore the same, up to rewriting, and a numerical check at one well-chosen point is enough to catch almost every mistake.
Part A: the basics (/50)
Exercise 1: Polynomial long division
The thread of the whole set fits in five words: THE DENOMINATOR IS IN CHARGE. But before you are allowed to read it, there is a toll to pay, and that toll is a division. As long as the numerator has a degree greater than or equal to that of the denominator, the partial fraction decomposition does not exist in the expected form: you must first extract the polynomial part.
a) State the division algorithm for polynomials, dividing A by B, and specify the condition on the remainder that makes the division stop.
b) Carry out the division of 2x+1 by x−3, then write x−32x+1 in the form Q(x)+x−3R(x).
c) The figure shows the division of 2x4+x−1 by x2−3. Read Q and R from it, justify the line “6x2+x−1”, and write x2−32x4+x−1 in the form Q(x)+B(x)R(x).
d) Do the same for x+2x2+3 and for 2x−1x3.
e) For these four fractions, is the remainder zero? What would a zero remainder mean about the divisibility of A by B?
Show the solution
Answers
a)A=BQ+R with degR<degB
b)x−32x+1=2+x−37
c)2x2+6+x2−3x+17
d)x−2+x+27; 21x2+41x+81+8(2x−1)1
e)Nonzero remainders; a zero remainder: B divides A
a)
For any polynomials A and B with B nonzero, there is a UNIQUE pair (Q,R) such that A(x)=B(x)×Q(x)+R(x) with deg(R)<deg(B). That last inequality, and it alone, tells you when to stop: you go down one degree at each step, and you put the pencil down as soon as the remainder falls strictly below the degree of the divisor. Dividing the equality by B(x) gives the form that is useful here: B(x)A(x)=Q(x)+B(x)R(x), where the second fraction now has a numerator smaller than its denominator.
b)
Divide 2x+1 by x−3. The leading term 2x comes from 2×x, so the quotient starts with 2; subtract 2(x−3)=2x−6 and what is left is 1−(−6)=7. Since deg(7)=0<deg(x−3)=1, the division is over: 2x+1=(x−3)×2+7, so x−32x+1=2+x−37. This is the founding example of the chapter: on the right, everything can be read off, the constant 2 is the limiting value at infinity and the piece x−37 carries the pole on its own.
c)
On the figure: 2x4=2x2×(x2−3) up to the first term, subtract 2x4−6x2 and 6x2+x−1 is left, which explains the middle line. Then 6x2=6×(x2−3) up to the first term, subtract 6x2−18 and x+17 is left. Since deg(x+17)=1<deg(x2−3)=2, you stop. So Q(x)=2x2+6, R(x)=x+17, and x2−32x4+x−1=2x2+6+x2−3x+17. Watch out for the layout trap: the dividend has no x3 term and no x2 term, so leave those columns empty rather than shifting the terms.
d)
For x+2x2+3: x2+3=(x+2)(x−2)+7, so x+2x2+3=x−2+x+27. For 2x−1x3, the leading coefficient of the divisor is not 1, which puts fractions in the quotient and makes many students give up: x3=(2x−1)(21x2+41x+81)+81, so 2x−1x3=21x2+41x+81+8(2x−1)1. Check by expanding: it takes ten seconds and catches every sign error.
e)
None of the four remainders is zero: they are 7, x+17, 7 and 81. A zero remainder would mean that B divides A, so that the rational function is in fact a polynomial, and the chapter would stop there: there would be nothing to decompose. The case R=0 is exactly the one that makes the chapter necessary, because it is B(x)R(x), and it alone, that will be broken into partial fractions.
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.
Exercise 2: Reading the denominator: is the fraction already decomposed?
A partial fraction is a fraction that cannot be broken down any further: a constant numerator over a power of a linear factor, or a numerator of degree at most 1 over a power of a quadratic with no real root. Before computing anything, you must be able to recognize what is already finished. That is three exam marks earned in thirty seconds, and above all the only way to avoid decomposing a fraction that has nothing to give.
a) Give the domain of 2x−53, of x2+92x, of 2x2−8x1 and of (x−3)22.
b) Among the eight fractions 2x−53, x−3x+3, x2+x+12, x2+x+12x−3, x2+92x, 2x2−8x1, (x−3)22 and 2x−1x3, which ones are already decomposed into partial fractions?
c) For each of those that are not, say what blocks: a numerator degree that is too large, or a denominator that can still be factored.
d) Decompose 2x2−8x1.
e) Why is (x−3)22 already decomposed while (x+1)23x+1 is not? Both denominators are squares, after all.
Show the solution
Answers
a)R∖{25}, R, R∖{0,4}, R∖{3}
b)Five: 2x−53, the two over x2+x+1, x2+92x, (x−3)22
c)Degree too large: x−3x+3, 2x−1x3; factors: 2x2−8x1
d)−8x1+8(x−4)1
e)The linear numerator opens the second term
a)
Exclude the roots of the denominator. 2x−5=0 gives x=25, so the domain is R∖{25}. x2+9 never vanishes on R, so the domain is all of R: an irreducible denominator creates no excluded value, which is the first visible sign that it is irreducible. 2x2−8x=2x(x−4) vanishes at 0 and at 4, so the domain is R∖{0,4}. Finally (x−3)2 vanishes only at 3, domain R∖{3}.
b)
Already decomposed: 2x−53, because the denominator has degree 1 and nothing more can be broken; x2+x+12 and x2+x+12x−3, because Δ=1−4=−3<0 and the numerator has degree at most 1; x2+92x, for the same reason with Δ=−36<0; and (x−3)22, because the numerator is constant and the denominator is a power of a linear factor.
c)
x−3x+3 is blocked by the degree: deg(A)=deg(B)=1, you must divide, and you get 1+x−36. 2x−1x3 is blocked the same way, with deg(A)=3>1; the division was done in exercise 1. 2x2−8x1 is blocked by the factorization: Δ=64>0, the denominator breaks into 2x(x−4).
d)
2x2−8x1=2x(x−4)1=xA+x−4B. Over the common denominator 2x(x−4), the numerator becomes 2A(x−4)+2Bx, which must equal 1 for every x. At x=0: −8A=1, so A=−81. At x=4: 8B=1, so B=81. Hence 2x2−8x1=−8x1+8(x−4)1. Check at x=2: on the left 8−161=−81, on the right −161−161=−81.
e)
The difference is not in the denominator but in the NUMERATOR. For (x−3)22, the numerator is constant: there is nothing to share out, the fraction is a partial fraction on its own. For (x+1)23x+1, the numerator has degree 1 and can be split into a part that cancels a factor (x+1) and a part that does not, hence two terms. This is the general rule for a repeated factor, treated in exercise 5: a square in the denominator opens TWO terms, and the degree of the numerator decides whether the first one is empty or not.
Exercise 3: Two simple poles: equating coefficients
Here is the basic case, the one that comes back in almost every exam: the denominator is a quadratic with two distinct roots. The figure shows the curve of y=x2−5x+63: it blows up in two places, and those two places are exactly the two factors of the denominator. Decomposing means writing the function as the sum of what each pole does separately.
a) Factor x2−5x+6 and give the domain of x↦x2−5x+63.
b) Read the two excluded values from the figure. Explain why the curve has exactly as many vertical asymptotes as the denominator has roots.
c) Decompose x2−5x+63 by equating coefficients: set up the form, bring it to a common denominator, equate the coefficients of x and the constant terms, solve.
d) Decompose x2−5x+63x−7 by the same method.
e) Check both results at x=0, then say why this check alone does not prove everything.
Show the solution
Answers
a)(x−2)(x−3), domain R∖{2,3}
b)Two roots, two asymptotes: x=2 and x=3
c)x−2−3+x−33
d)x−21+x−32
e)21 and −67; one point does not prove the equality
a)
Look for two numbers with sum 5 and product 6: they are 2 and 3, so x2−5x+6=(x−2)(x−3). The domain is R∖{2,3}. You can also go through the discriminant, Δ=25−24=1, roots 25±1, but sum and product is twice as fast on a monic quadratic with integer roots.
b)
The figure shows two vertical asymptotes, at x=2 and x=3, drawn as dashed lines. Each root of the denominator makes it vanish without making the numerator vanish, so the fraction tends to infinity in absolute value: one root, one asymptote. This is the graphical translation of the thread of the set, THE DENOMINATOR IS IN CHARGE. Notice the middle branch, between 2 and 3: it stays below −12, because (x−2)(x−3) is negative there with absolute value at most 41.
c)
Set (x−2)(x−3)3=x−2A+x−3B. Over a common denominator: (x−2)(x−3)A(x−3)+B(x−2)=(x−2)(x−3)(A+B)x−3A−2B. The two fractions have the same denominator and are equal for every x in the domain, so the numerators are the same polynomial: A+B=0 and −3A−2B=3. From the first, A=−B, which you substitute: 3B−2B=3, so B=3 and A=−3. Conclusion: x2−5x+63=x−2−3+x−33.
d)
Same form, different numerator: A(x−3)+B(x−2)=3x−7, so A+B=3 and −3A−2B=−7. Multiplying the first by 2 and adding: −A=−7+6=−1, so A=1 and B=2. Hence x2−5x+63x−7=x−21+x−32. Remember: the FORM of the decomposition did not move one bit between c) and d), only the coefficients changed. The numerator never decides the form.
e)
At x=0 for the first: on the left 63=21, on the right −2−3+−33=23−1=21. For the second: on the left 6−7, on the right −21+−32=−21−32=−67. This check is excellent but it is not a proof: two functions can agree at one point without being equal. It becomes a proof if you do it at as many points as there are unknowns, here two, because two polynomials of degree at most 1 that agree at two points are equal.
Exercise 4: The cover-up method: multiply, then substitute
Equating coefficients always works, but it is expensive: with three poles it is already a system of three equations in three unknowns, and with five, nobody finishes in the time allowed. There is a shortcut that gives each coefficient on its own, in one line: cover the factor whose coefficient you want and evaluate what is left at its root.
a) You are looking for (x−1)(x+2)(x−3)3=x−1A+x+2B+x−3C. Write the system of three equations given by equating coefficients, without solving it.
b) Multiply the equality by (x−1), simplify, then replace x by 1. What happens to the terms in B and C? Deduce A.
c) Get B and C by the same procedure, without solving any system.
d) Check that the triple you found satisfies the three equations of a).
e) Decompose k(k+1)1, then compute ∑k=1nk(k+1)1 and its limit.
Show the solution
Answers
a)A+B+C=0, −A−4B+C=0, −6A+3B−2C=3
b)A=−21
c)B=51, C=103
d)All three equations hold
e)k1−k+11; sum n+1n, limit 1
a)
Over a common denominator, the numerator on the right is A(x+2)(x−3)+B(x−1)(x−3)+C(x−1)(x+2). Expanding and collecting: the coefficient of x2 is A+B+C, that of x is −A−4B+C, and the constant term is −6A+3B−2C. Since this polynomial must be the constant 3, you get A+B+C=0, −A−4B+C=0 and −6A+3B−2C=3. Three equations, three unknowns, and plenty of chances to get a sign wrong.
b)
Multiply everything by (x−1): on the left (x+2)(x−3)3 remains, on the right A+x+2B(x−1)+x−3C(x−1). The equality holds for every x other than 1, −2 and 3, hence also at x=1 by continuity. At x=1, the factors (x−1) in the terms in B and C vanish and those two terms disappear: what is left is A=(1+2)(1−3)3=−63=−21.
c)
The same move with (x+2) and x=−2 gives B=(−2−1)(−2−3)3=153=51. With (x−3) and x=3: C=(3−1)(3+2)3=103. In practice you rewrite nothing: you COVER the chosen factor in the original denominator with your finger and evaluate what is left at the root of that factor. Hence the name. Conclusion: (x−1)(x+2)(x−3)3=−2(x−1)1+5(x+2)1+10(x−3)3.
d)
A+B+C=−21+51+103=10−5+2+3=0. Next −A−4B+C=21−54+103=105−8+3=0. Finally −6A+3B−2C=3+53−53=3. All three equations hold: the shortcut gives the exact solution of the system, not an approximation. A limitation to know: it applies as is only to SIMPLE poles, and for a repeated factor it only delivers the coefficient of the highest power.
e)
k(k+1)1 has two simple poles, 0 and −1: by cover-up, the coefficient of k1 is 0+11=1 and that of k+11 is −11=−1, so k(k+1)1=k1−k+11. The sum telescopes: ∑k=1n(k1−k+11)=1−n+11=n+1n, because each −k+11 cancels the k+11 of the next term. The limit is 1. This is the textbook example of a telescoping series, and it shows that the decomposition is useful well beyond antiderivatives.
Exercise 5: The repeated factor: why two terms and not one
When a factor appears squared or cubed, a single term is no longer enough. This is the point of the chapter where the most marks are lost, because the form looks heavy and you are tempted to lighten it. The reasoning of question a) shows that there is no choice: the lighter form is wrong, and it is wrong for a reason of degree.
a) Show that it is IMPOSSIBLE to write (x+1)23x+1=(x+1)2A with A constant.
b) Decompose (x+1)23x+1 in the form x+1A+(x+1)2B.
c) Decompose x3+3x2+3x+1x2+x+1 by setting u=x+1 after recognizing the denominator.
d) Decompose (x−1)(x2+4x+4)2x+1: get two coefficients by the cover-up method, the third by a convenient value.
e) Explain why the cover-up method does not directly give the coefficient of x+21 in d).
Show the solution
Answers
a)3x+1=A constant: impossible
b)x+13−(x+1)22
c)x+11−(x+1)21+(x+1)31
d)3(x−1)1−3(x+2)1+(x+2)21
e)The cover-up method only reaches the highest power
a)
If (x+1)23x+1=(x+1)2A, then multiplying by (x+1)2 gives 3x+1=A for every x in the domain, that is, a polynomial of degree 1 equal to a constant: impossible. The reasoning is general and gives the rule: a factor (x−a)m opens m terms, x−aA1+⋯+(x−a)mAm, and it is the degree of the numerator that decides which ones are nonzero. With a constant numerator, only the last one survives, which explains the case (x−3)22 in exercise 2.
b)
3x+1=A(x+1)+B. At x=−1: −3+1=−2=B. The coefficient of x gives A=3. So (x+1)23x+1=x+13−(x+1)22. Another route, often faster: write 3x+1=3(x+1)−2 then divide term by term by (x+1)2. It is the same idea as long division, applied to the numerator rather than to the whole fraction.
c)
Recognize x3+3x2+3x+1=(x+1)3, a special product of degree 3. The substitution u=x+1, so x=u−1, turns the numerator into (u−1)2+(u−1)+1=u2−2u+1+u−1+1=u2−u+1. Hence (x+1)3x2+x+1=u3u2−u+1=u1−u21+u31, that is, x+11−(x+1)21+(x+1)31. The substitution avoids the system entirely: as soon as there is only one repeated pole, it is the method to use.
d)
x2+4x+4=(x+2)2, so the form is x−1A+x+2B+(x+2)2C. Covering (x−1) at x=1 gives A=(1+2)22+1=93=31. Covering (x+2)2 at x=−2 gives C=−2−12(−2)+1=−3−3=1. For B, take a simple value, x=0: on the left (−1)(4)1=−41; on the right −31+2B+41. Hence 2B=−41+31−41=−61 and B=−31. Conclusion: 3(x−1)1−3(x+2)1+(x+2)21.
e)
Multiplying by (x+2) alone does not clear the denominator: an (x+2) remains under the term in C, and the expression blows up at x=−2 instead of simplifying. Multiplying by (x+2)2 clears everything, but then the term in B is multiplied by (x+2) and vanishes at x=−2: you recover C, not B. In other words, the cover-up method always reaches the HIGHEST power of a factor, never the intermediate powers. For those you need a convenient value, a derivative, or equating coefficients.
Part B: problems and reasoning (/50)
Exercise 6: The irreducible quadratic factor and its linear numerator
A quadratic with a negative discriminant does not break: it stays whole in the denominator. But then the numerator that goes with it is no longer a constant, it is a polynomial of degree 1. Understanding WHY is more useful than memorizing the rule, because the same argument gives the form of any case, including the ones you have never seen.
a) Check that x3−1=(x−1)(x2+x+1), then show that x2+x+1 has no real root.
b) Why is the term attached to x2+x+1 written x2+x+1Bx+C and not x2+x+1B? Count the unknowns and compare with the degree of the denominator.
c) Decompose (x−1)(x2+x+1)3x2+1: find A by cover-up, then B and C by giving x the values 0 and −1.
d) Check the result at x=2.
e) Without computing the coefficients, give the form of the decomposition of (x2+4)(x2+x+1)x2+1 and the number of unknowns.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Δ=−3<0: irreducible
b)Degree 3, so 3 unknowns: Bx+C over the quadratic
c)3(x−1)4+3(x2+x+1)5x+1
d)713 on both sides
e)x2+4Ax+B+x2+x+1Cx+D, 4 unknowns
a)
Expand: (x−1)(x2+x+1)=x3+x2+x−x2−x−1=x3−1. For x2+x+1, the discriminant is Δ=1−4=−3<0, so there is no real root: the quadratic is irreducible over R. Another reading, useful in an exam: x2+x+1=(x+21)2+43, the sum of a square and a strictly positive number, so it is always at least 43.
b)
The principle is a count of unknowns. A denominator of degree n requires exactly n coefficients to determine, because the generic numerator of the original fraction has n free coefficients. Here the denominator (x−1)(x2+x+1) has degree 3: three unknowns are needed. The linear factor brings one, A; the quadratic factor must therefore bring two, hence a numerator Bx+C. With x2+x+1B there would be only two in total, and the system would in general have no solution.
c)
Covering (x−1) at x=1 gives A=1+1+13+1=34. Next write (x−1)(x2+x+1)3x2+1=3(x−1)4+x2+x+1Bx+C and choose simple values. At x=0: on the left (−1)(1)1=−1, on the right −34+C, so C=31. At x=−1: on the left (−2)(1)4=−2, on the right −32+(−B+C), so −B=−2+32−31=−35 and B=35. Conclusion: 3(x−1)4+3(x2+x+1)5x+1.
d)
At x=2: on the left (1)(4+2+1)3×4+1=713. On the right 34+3×711=34+2111=2128+11=2139=713. The two agree. Since the decomposition has three unknowns, a check at three distinct points would be a complete proof; in practice one well-chosen point is enough to catch the vast majority of sign errors.
e)
x2+4 has discriminant −16<0 and x2+x+1 has discriminant −3<0: both factors are irreducible, neither breaks. The form is therefore x2+4Ax+B+x2+x+1Cx+D, with four unknowns, which is indeed the degree 4 of the denominator. Note that the cover-up method is useless here, for lack of a real root: you go through equating coefficients or convenient values.
Exercise 7: The form before the coefficients
In an exam, the question “give the form of the decomposition” is often worth as much as the full computation, and it takes thirty times less time. The figure sums up the rule: each factor of the denominator dictates its own terms, independently of the others and independently of the numerator. Only one trap makes it go wrong, and it is always the same: a quadratic you believe to be irreducible and that is not.
a) Using the figure, explain in one sentence why a repeated factor opens several terms while a simple factor opens only one.
b) Give the form of the decomposition of f(x)=(x2−4x+3)2(x2+x+1)5x+3. Examine the first quadratic before anything else.
c) Same instruction for x(x+2)(x+5)2x2+x+1 and for (x+2)2(x2−9)x3+x.
d) Same instruction for x3(x−1)(x2+x+2)x4+1 and for (x−5)(x2+5)2x3+3.
e) For each of the five forms, count the unknowns and compare with the degree of the denominator. What do you notice?
Show the solution
Answers
a)One term per power that can cancel
b)x−1A+(x−1)2B+x−3C+(x−3)2D+x2+x+1Ex+F
c)3 simple poles; x+2A+(x+2)2B+x−3C+x+3D
d)6 unknowns; 5 unknowns with (x2+5)2
e)Unknowns = degree of the denominator
a)
Because a factor (x−a)m can cancel with the numerator to different orders: one part of the numerator leaves (x−a)m whole in the denominator, another removes one power, and so on. So you need one term per power, from 1 to m, whereas a simple factor offers only one possibility of cancellation.
b)
The trap comes first: x2−4x+3 has discriminant 16−12=4>0, so it is NOT irreducible and equals (x−1)(x−3). The denominator is therefore (x−1)2(x−3)2(x2+x+1), of degree 6. Since x2+x+1 has discriminant −3<0, the form is x−1A+(x−1)2B+x−3C+(x−3)2D+x2+x+1Ex+F. Writing (x2−4x+3)2Ax+B would be the classic mistake: a linear numerator goes over a quadratic only if that quadratic is irreducible.
c)
x(x+2)(x+5)2x2+x+1: three simple poles, so xA+x+2B+x+5C, three unknowns. For (x+2)2(x2−9)x3+x, same trap as in b): x2−9=(x−3)(x+3), a difference of squares, not an irreducible quadratic. The form is therefore x+2A+(x+2)2B+x−3C+x+3D, four unknowns. In both cases the numerator has a degree strictly lower than the denominator, so no preliminary division.
d)
x3(x−1)(x2+x+2)x4+1: the factor x3 is a repeated factor of order 3 with a=0, and x2+x+2 has discriminant 1−8=−7<0. The form is xA+x2B+x3C+x−1D+x2+x+2Ex+F, six unknowns. For (x−5)(x2+5)2x3+3: x2+5 is irreducible and appears squared, so it opens two terms, each with a linear numerator. The form is x−5A+x2+5Bx+C+(x2+5)2Dx+E, five unknowns.
e)
The counts: b) six unknowns for a denominator of degree 6; c) three for degree 3, then four for degree 4; d) six for degree 6, then five for degree 5. The number of unknowns always equals the degree of the denominator. It is the best check there is on a form: if the two numbers differ, the form is wrong, almost always because a repeated factor did not get all its terms or because a quadratic that factors was treated as irreducible.
Exercise 8: Five statements to correct
Each of the following five statements has been heard in tutoring sessions, and each one is false. Say why, then state the correct version. It is the most profitable exercise of the set: these five mistakes alone account for most of the marks lost on this chapter.
a) “x2+4 is irreducible over R, so x4+4 is too.”
b) “To decompose x2−1x3+2, you write x−1A+x+1B directly.”
c) “x2−4x+3 is a quadratic, so it brings a term x2−4x+3Bx+C.”
d) “A factor (x+1)2 in the denominator brings exactly one term, (x+1)2B.”
e) “The cover-up method gives every coefficient of a decomposition.”
Show the solution
Answers
a)False: x4+4=(x2+2x+2)(x2−2x+2)
b)False: divide first, x+2(x−1)3−2(x+1)1
c)False: Δ=4>0, two terms
d)False: two terms, x+1A+(x+1)2B
e)False: simple poles and the highest power only
a)
FALSE. x2+4 is indeed irreducible, but x4+4 factors: this is the Sophie Germain identity, x4+4=(x2+2)2−(2x)2=(x2+2x+2)(x2−2x+2). Each of the two factors has discriminant 4−8=−4<0, so they are irreducible, and the decomposition of x4+41 has four unknowns, not two. The correct version: over R, every polynomial of degree at least 3 can be factored; only degrees 1 and 2 can be irreducible.
b)
FALSE, because deg(x3+2)=3≥2=deg(x2−1). You must divide first: x3+2=(x2−1)×x+(x+2), so x2−1x3+2=x+x2−1x+2. Only this remainder is decomposed, with x2−1=(x−1)(x+1): the cover-up method gives 21+2=23 and −2−1+2=−21. Full result: x+2(x−1)3−2(x+1)1. Without the division, the resulting system simply has no solution.
c)
FALSE. The criterion is not the degree but the DISCRIMINANT: Δ=16−12=4>0, so x2−4x+3=(x−1)(x−3) and it brings two terms x−1A+x−3C. The correct rule: a quadratic gets a numerator Bx+C only if Δ<0. The reflex to build: for every quadratic in the denominator, compute the discriminant BEFORE writing the form, never after.
d)
FALSE in general. The factor (x+1)2 opens two terms, x+1A+(x+1)2B, and the first coefficient is zero only in the special case where the numerator does not need it, for example (x+1)22. As soon as the numerator has degree 1, as in (x+1)23x+1=x+13−(x+1)22, both terms are used. Correct version: (x−a)m opens m terms, some of which may turn out to be empty after computation.
e)
FALSE. The cover-up method reaches the SIMPLE poles and, for a repeated factor (x−a)m, only the coefficient of (x−a)m1. The intermediate powers escape it, because multiplying by (x−a)m makes their terms vanish at x=a. It gives nothing on an irreducible quadratic factor either, for lack of a real root at which to evaluate. Correct version: the cover-up method is a partial accelerator, to be completed by convenient values or by equating coefficients.
Exercise 9: What the decomposition is for: antiderivatives and area
The chapter does not exist for its own sake: it exists because nobody can find an antiderivative of x2−5x+63 directly, while everybody can find one for x−21. The decomposition turns an impossible problem into a sum of known problems. The figure shows the area you are going to compute, under the right-hand branch of the curve from exercise 3, between x=4 and x=5.
a) Using the decomposition from exercise 3, give an antiderivative of x↦x2−5x+63 on the interval (3,+∞).
b) Compute the shaded area of the figure, that is, ∫45x2−5x+63dx. Give the exact value, then an approximation to within 10−3.
c) Fully decompose x2−32x4+x−1, given that the poles are ±3, then give an antiderivative of it on (3,+∞).
d) Show that you get the same result faster by splitting x2−3x+17=x2−3x+x2−317.
e) Work out ∫x2+x+12dx. Since the denominator is irreducible, which function replaces the logarithm?
Show the solution
Answers
a)3ln(x−2x−3)
b)3ln34≈0.863
c)32x3+6x+6173+3ln(x−3)−6173−3ln(x+3)
d)21ln∣x2−3∣ plus the part in x2−317
e)34arctan(32x+1)+K
a)
Exercise 3 gives x2−5x+63=x−2−3+x−33. On (3,+∞), both x−2 and x−3 are strictly positive, so an antiderivative is F(x)=−3ln(x−2)+3ln(x−3)=3ln(x−2x−3). Combining into a single logarithm is not required, but it makes the computation in b) immediate. On another interval, you would need absolute values.
b)
∫45x2−5x+63dx=[3ln(x−2x−3)]45=3ln32−3ln21=3ln(32×2)=3ln34. Numerically, 3ln34≈0.863. The result agrees with the figure: the shaded region lies between x=4 and x=5, its height goes down from 1.5 to 0.5, so its area is roughly 0.9 square units.
c)
Exercise 1 gave x2−32x4+x−1=2x2+6+x2−3x+17. What remains is to break the fractional piece: x2−3=(x−3)(x+3), so by cover-up A=233+17=6173+3 and B=−23−3+17=−6173−3. An antiderivative on (3,+∞) is therefore 32x3+6x+6173+3ln(x−3)−6173−3ln(x+3).
d)
The first piece has a numerator proportional to the derivative of the denominator: x2−3x=21×x2−32x, with antiderivative 21ln∣x2−3∣, without any decomposition. The second, x2−317, decomposes as 2317(x−31−x+31). You do recover the coefficients of c), since 21+2317=63+173 and 21−2317=63−173. A reflex worth keeping: before decomposing, remove the part of the numerator that is the derivative of the denominator; it halves the work.
e)
Here Δ=−3<0: no real pole, so no logarithm. Complete the square, x2+x+1=(x+21)2+43, and recognize the form of the derivative of the arctangent. With u=32x+1, you get ∫x2+x+12dx=34arctan(32x+1)+K. General rule of the next chapter: a real pole gives a logarithm, an irreducible factor gives an arctangent, and a power gives a fraction.
Exercise 10: An epidemic in a school: the logistic model
A flu breaks out in a school of 1,200 students. Every day the school nurse records the number of sick students, plotted on the figure. The number does not grow without bound: it flattens out against the total population. The model that describes this, called logistic, is solved through a partial fraction decomposition, and there is no other elementary way to integrate it.
a) The model reads dtdP=MkP(M−P), where M is the total population. Decompose P(M−P)1 into partial fractions, the variable being P.
b) Separate the variables and integrate to show that ln(M−PP)=kt+C as long as 0<P<M.
c) With M=1200 and P(0)=20, show that P(t)=1+59e−kt1200.
d) The data give P(4)=200. Compute k to within 10−3, then the forecast for day 7. Compare with the point on the figure.
e) When is the rate of spread greatest, that is, when does P reach 2M=600?
Show the solution
Answers
a)M1(P1+M−P1)
b)ln(M−PP)=kt+C
c)P(t)=1+59e−kt1200
d)k≈0.617; P(7)≈672
e)t=kln59≈6.61 days
a)
The denominator P(M−P) has two simple poles, P=0 and P=M. By cover-up: the coefficient of P1 is M−01=M1, and that of M−P1 is obtained at P=M, where it is M1 as well. So P(M−P)1=M1(P1+M−P1). A quick check over a common denominator: M1×P(M−P)(M−P)+P=P(M−P)1. The symmetry of the two coefficients is no accident: it reflects the fact that sick and healthy students play the same role in the model.
b)
Separate: P(M−P)dP=Mkdt. Integrating the left side with a): M1(lnP−ln(M−P)), the minus sign coming from the derivative of M−P, which is −1. On the right: Mkt+constant. Multiply by M and what is left is ln(M−PP)=kt+C. The quotient M−PP is the ratio of sick to healthy students, and the model says that it grows exponentially, which is more telling than the original equation.
c)
Taking exponentials: M−PP=eCekt. At t=0 with P=20 and M=1200: 118020=591=eC. So 1200−PP=59ekt, hence 59P=(1200−P)ekt, then P(59+ekt)=1200ekt and P=59+ekt1200ekt. Dividing top and bottom by ekt: P(t)=1+59e−kt1200. This form shows the two asymptotes of the phenomenon: P→0 as t→−∞ and P→1200 as t→+∞, the line M=1200 drawn dashed on the figure.
d)
P(4)=200 gives 1000200=51=591e4k, so e4k=559=11.8 and k=4ln11.8≈0.617 per day. Forecast for day 7: P(7)=1+59e−4.3191200≈1.7851200≈672 students. The data on the figure give 672 on day 7: the model fits. Note that a pure exponential model, fitted to the same two points, would predict 20×107/4≈1125 sick students on day 7, then 20×102=2000 on day 8, more than the whole school: that is the impossibility the logistic model corrects.
e)
The rate dtdP=MkP(M−P) is a quadratic in P, greatest halfway between its roots, so at P=2M=600. Solve 600600=1=591ekt, so ekt=59 and t=kln59≈0.6174.078≈6.61 days. This is the inflection point of the S-shaped curve: before it the epidemic speeds up, after it the epidemic slows down, even though the number of sick students keeps increasing. Confusing these two moments is the most frequent interpretation mistake with this model.
Part C: the bank of decompositions (/60)
Exercise 11: A first-degree denominator: the numerator decides everything
The next six exercises are drill, in the format of the worksheets handed out in class: an instruction, a list of functions, and nothing else. One by one, they go through every possible case of denominator, from the simplest to the most twisted. The table maps out the ground: each row is a shape of denominator, and each shape has its exercise.
We start with the case where the denominator has degree one. There is then nothing to factor and nothing to share out, so all the difficulty moves to the numerator: is it small enough? If deg(A)<deg(B), the fraction is already a partial fraction and there is nothing to do; otherwise you divide, and the quotient leaves the fraction for good.
Denominator B(x)
What it opens
Where to practise
deg(A)≥deg(B)
a polynomial quotient, then decompose the remainder
Exercise 11
ax+b
ax+bA, a single term
Exercise 11
(x−a)(x−b), a=b
x−aA+x−bB
Exercise 12
(x−a)m
m terms, from x−aA1 to (x−a)mAm
Exercise 13
ax2+bx+c with Δ<0
ax2+bx+cBx+C, linear numerator
Exercise 14
(ax2+bx+c)m with Δ<0
m terms with linear numerators
Exercise 14
denominator not yet factored
factor first, then one of the rows above
Exercise 15
a) Decompose A(x)=3x+25 and B(x)=x+1x−4.
b) Decompose C(x)=x−2x2−1 and D(x)=x+32x3.
c) Decompose E(x)=2x−14x2+1.
d) For each of the five functions, say whether a division was needed, and why.
e) B(x) and C(x) both have a denominator of degree 1, and yet one brings a constant out of the fraction and the other a polynomial of degree 1. What controls the degree of this quotient?
Show the solution
Answers
a)A already a partial fraction; B(x)=1−x+15
b)C(x)=x+2+x−23; D(x)=2x2−6x+18−x+354
c)E(x)=2x+1+2x−12
d)Division for B, C, D, E; not for A
e)Degree of the quotient =degA−degB
a)
A(x)=3x+25 is already a partial fraction: deg(A)=0<1=deg(B), the denominator has degree one, there is nothing to break. Writing it x+2/35/3 is allowed but decomposes nothing further. For B(x)=x+1x−4, the two degrees are equal, so division is required: x−4=(x+1)−5, hence B(x)=1−x+15. Check at x=3: on the left 4−1=−0.25, on the right 1−45=−0.25.
b)
C(x)=x−2x2−1: the numerator has degree 2, the denominator degree 1, so the quotient will have degree 1. Carry out the division, or force x−2 to appear: x2−1=(x−2)(x+2)+3, because (x−2)(x+2)=x2−4 and exactly 3 is missing to reach x2−1. So C(x)=x+2+x−23. For D(x)=x+32x3, the quotient has degree 2: 2x3=(x+3)(2x2−6x+18)−54, which you check by expanding, (x+3)(2x2−6x+18)=2x3+54. So D(x)=2x2−6x+18−x+354. Check at x=1: on the left 42=0.5, on the right 2−6+18−454=14−13.5=0.5.
c)
E(x)=2x−14x2+1: the divisor is not monic, which worries people for no reason. Here 4 is divisible by 2, so the quotient keeps integer coefficients: 4x2+1=(2x−1)(2x+1)+2, because (2x−1)(2x+1)=4x2−1. So E(x)=2x+1+2x−12. That is not always the case: with 2x−1x2+x the quotient would be 2x+43, and fractions in the quotient are not a mistake.
d)
A: no division, 0<1. B: division, both degrees are 1 and equality is enough to require it. C: division, 2>1. D: division, 3>1. E: division, 2>1. The rule never looks at the coefficients, only at the degrees: division is required as soon as deg(A)≥deg(B), and useless otherwise since it would only give a zero quotient.
e)
The degree of the quotient is deg(A)−deg(B), nothing else. For B: 1−1=0, the quotient is a constant, here 1. For C: 2−1=1, the quotient has degree 1, here x+2. For D: 3−1=2, hence the three terms 2x2−6x+18. It is the fastest check on a division: before even setting it up, you know how many terms the quotient will have, and a quotient of unexpected degree signals an alignment error. The remainder, for its part, always has a degree strictly lower than that of the divisor, so here it is always a constant.
Exercise 12: Two simple poles, including when the denominator is not monic
Two distinct real roots is the most frequent case in exams, and the only one where the cover-up method gives both coefficients in two lines. The trap in this set is not the computation, it is in the shape of the factors: two of the five denominators have a leading coefficient other than 1, and many students force them to be monic, forgetting the factor taken out along the way.
A reminder of the cover-up move for a factor (x−a): cover this factor in the denominator, evaluate everything else at x=a, and the number you get is the coefficient you want. For a factor (px+q), evaluate at its root x=−pq and keep px+q as is in the denominator of the term.
a) Decompose A(x)=(x−1)(x+4)x+5 and B(x)=x2−163x.
b) Decompose C(x)=3x2−5x−21.
c) Decompose D(x)=x2−x7 and E(x)=2x2+x−65x−2.
d) Check three of these decompositions at a value of x chosen away from the poles.
e) In C(x), the factor 3x+1 is not monic. Write the corresponding term in the two forms 3x+1B and x+31B′, then give the relation between B and B′.
Show the solution
Answers
a)5(x−1)6−5(x+4)1; 2(x−4)3+2(x+4)3
b)7(x−2)1−7(3x+1)3
c)−x7+x−17; 7(2x−3)11+7(x+2)12
d)At x=1: −0.2, −41, −1
e)B′=3B=−71
a)
A(x)=x−1A1+x+4A2. Cover x−1, evaluate at 1: A1=1+41+5=56. Cover x+4, evaluate at −4: A2=−4−1−4+5=−51. So A(x)=5(x−1)6−5(x+4)1. For B, factor first: x2−16=(x−4)(x+4), a difference of squares, certainly not an irreducible quadratic. Cover-up at 4: 4+43×4=812=23. Cover-up at −4: −8−12=23. So B(x)=2(x−4)3+2(x+4)3.
b)
3x2−5x−2 has discriminant 25+24=49, so two roots, 65±7, that is, 2 and −31. The factorization reads 3(x−2)(x+31)=(x−2)(3x+1): the 3 goes into the second factor, it does not disappear. Then C(x)=x−2A1+3x+1A2. Cover-up at 2: A1=3×2+11=71. Cover-up at −31: A2=−31−21=−73. So C(x)=7(x−2)1−7(3x+1)3.
c)
x2−x=x(x−1). Cover-up at 0: 0−17=−7. Cover-up at 1: 17=7. So D(x)=−x7+x−17. For E: 2x2+x−6 has discriminant 1+48=49, roots 4−1±7, that is, 23 and −2, hence 2x2+x−6=(2x−3)(x+2). Cover-up at −2: 2(−2)−3−10−2=−7−12=712. Cover-up at 23: 23+2215−2=27211=711. So E(x)=7(2x−3)11+7(x+2)12.
d)
At x=1 for B: on the left −153=−0.2, on the right −21+103=−0.2. At x=1 for C: on the left 3−5−21=−41, on the right −71−283=28−4−3=−41. At x=1 for E: on the left 2+1−63=−1, on the right −711+74=−1. This check takes ten seconds and catches nearly all sign errors, which are the number one mistake of the chapter.
e)
3x+1−3/7 and x+31B′ describe the same function if B′=3B=−71, since 3x+1=3(x+31). Both forms are correct and the decomposition remains unique: it is unique up to the form of the factors, a form chosen at the start. What would be wrong is going from 3x+1B to x+1/3B without dividing by 3, a mistake that multiplies the term by 3 and makes every numerical check fail.
Exercise 13: Repeated factors: how many terms, and which one stays empty
A factor (x−a)m opens exactly m terms, and this does not depend on the numerator. The numerator only decides whether some of those terms receive a zero. That is the source of the most stubborn confusion in the chapter: you see a square in the denominator and no longer know whether you need one term or two.
Two methods live side by side here, and you must be able to switch from one to the other. On a repeated factor on its own, rewriting the numerator in powers of (x−a) gives the result without any system. As soon as another factor sits next to the repeated factor, the cover-up method gives the extreme coefficients and a convenient value of x finishes the job.
a) Decompose A(x)=(x+2)24 and B(x)=(x+2)23x−1.
b) Decompose C(x)=(x−1)3x2 by writing x2 in powers of x−1.
c) Decompose D(x)=x2(x+3)5.
d) Decompose E(x)=x(x−4)22x2+3.
e) A(x) and B(x) have the same denominator. Why is the first already decomposed and not the second? How many terms does the form of A(x) really have?
Show the solution
Answers
a)A already a partial fraction; B(x)=x+23−(x+2)27
b)x−11+(x−1)22+(x−1)31
c)−9x5+3x25+9(x+3)5
d)16x3+16(x−4)29+4(x−4)235
e)Two terms for A, the first one empty
a)
A(x)=(x+2)24 is already a partial fraction: a constant numerator over a power of a linear factor, there is nothing to share out. For B, the numerator has degree 1; write it in powers of x+2: 3x−1=3(x+2)−7. Dividing by (x+2)2: B(x)=x+23−(x+2)27. Check at x=0: on the left −41, on the right 23−47=−41.
b)
Write x=(x−1)+1, so x2=((x−1)+1)2=(x−1)2+2(x−1)+1. Dividing term by term by (x−1)3: C(x)=x−11+(x−1)22+(x−1)31. No system, no equating of coefficients: when the repeated factor is alone in the denominator, this rewriting is always the shortest method, and it gives all three coefficients at once. Check at x=3: on the left 89=1.125, on the right 21+42+81=1.125.
c)
x2 is a repeated factor of order 2 with a=0, so D(x)=xA1+x2A2+x+3A3, three unknowns for a denominator of degree 3. The cover-up method reaches the two highest powers: covering x2, evaluated at 0, A2=0+35=35; covering x+3, evaluated at −3, A3=(−3)25=95. That leaves A1, which the cover-up method cannot reach. Give x the value 1: 1×45=45 must equal A1+35+9×45, so A1=45−35−365=3645−60−5=−3620=−95. So D(x)=−9x5+3x25+9(x+3)5.
d)
E(x)=xA1+x−4A2+(x−4)2A3. Cover x, at 0: A1=(0−4)20+3=163. Cover (x−4)2, at 4: A3=42×16+3=435. For A2, the convenient value x=1: 1×92+3=95 must equal 163+−3A2+4×935. Isolate: −3A2=95−163−3635=14480−27−140=−14487=−4829, so A2=1629. So E(x)=16x3+16(x−4)29+4(x−4)235. Check at x=1: on the left 95≈0.5556, on the right 163−4829+3635≈0.5556.
e)
The difference lies in the NUMERATOR, not the denominator. The general form of A is indeed x+2A1+(x+2)2A2, two terms, exactly as for B: the denominator is in charge, and it is the same. Simply, equating coefficients, A1(x+2)+A2=4 for every x gives A1=0 and A2=4. The first term exists; it is empty. Saying straight away that A is already decomposed is correct and saves time; believing that A has only one term because its numerator is constant is faulty reasoning, which will cost marks as soon as the numerator stops being constant.
Exercise 14: Irreducible quadratics, alone or squared
A quadratic with a strictly negative discriminant does not break over R, and it requires a linear numerator above it, not a constant. The cover-up method never reaches it, for lack of a real root at which to evaluate: you must equate coefficients, and the most economical way is to compare the coefficient of the highest degree, then the constant term.
The first reflex is still to compute the discriminant. A quadratic declared irreducible without computing Δ is a bet, and it is the losing bet in half of the papers. Here all five quadratics are indeed irreducible, but you must prove it every time.
a) Decompose A(x)=x2+43x−1 and B(x)=(x+1)(x2+3)5.
b) Decompose C(x)=(x2+2)2x3 by writing x3 in terms of x2+2.
c) Decompose D(x)=x3+x2x+7.
d) Decompose E(x)=x3−81, starting by factoring.
e) Justify the discriminant of each quadratic encountered, and say why C(x) has four unknowns and not two.
Show the solution
Answers
a)A already a partial fraction; B(x)=4(x+1)5−4(x2+3)5(x−1)
b)x2+2x−(x2+2)22x
c)x7+x2+1−7x+2
d)12(x−2)1−12(x2+2x+4)x+4
e)Discriminants −16, −12, −8, −4, −12; C: 4 unknowns, 2 of them zero
a)
x2+4 has discriminant 0−16=−16<0, it is irreducible, and the numerator 3x−1 has degree 1: A(x) is already a partial fraction, nothing to do. For B, the form is x+1A1+x2+3A2x+A3, three unknowns for a denominator of degree 3, with Δ=0−12=−12<0. Covering x+1, evaluated at −1, gives A1=(−1)2+35=45. Then bring to a common denominator: 5=A1(x2+3)+(A2x+A3)(x+1). Coefficient of x2: 0=A1+A2, so A2=−45. Constant term: 5=3A1+A3=415+A3, so A3=45. So B(x)=4(x+1)5−4(x2+3)5(x−1). Check at x=0: on the left 35, on the right 45+125=1215+5=35.
b)
Make x2+2 appear in the numerator: x3=x(x2+2)−2x. Dividing by (x2+2)2: C(x)=x2+2x−(x2+2)22x. Here too, the rewriting replaces any system. Check at x=1: on the left 91, on the right 31−92=91.
c)
x3+x=x(x2+1), with Δ=0−4=−4<0 for x2+1. Form: xA1+x2+1A2x+A3. Cover-up at 0: A1=0+17=7. Then 2x+7=A1(x2+1)+(A2x+A3)x. Coefficient of x2: 0=7+A2, so A2=−7. Coefficient of x: 2=A3. So D(x)=x7+x2+1−7x+2. Check at x=1: on the left 29=4.5, on the right 7+2−5=4.5.
d)
x3−8=(x−2)(x2+2x+4), the difference of cubes identity. The quadratic has discriminant 4−16=−12<0, so it is indeed irreducible. Form: x−2A1+x2+2x+4A2x+A3. Cover-up at 2: A1=4+4+41=121. Then 1=A1(x2+2x+4)+(A2x+A3)(x−2). Coefficient of x2: 0=A1+A2, so A2=−121. Constant term: 1=4A1−2A3=31−2A3, so A3=−31. So E(x)=12(x−2)1−12(x2+2x+4)x+4, since −12x−31=−12x+4. Check at x=1: on the left −71, on the right −121−845=84−7−5=−71.
e)
The discriminants: x2+4 gives −16, x2+3 gives −12, x2+2 gives −8, x2+1 gives −4, and x2+2x+4 gives −12. All negative, all irreducible. For C(x), the denominator (x2+2)2 has degree 4, so the general form has four unknowns: x2+2A1x+A2+(x2+2)2A3x+A4. The rewriting gave A1=1, A2=0, A3=−2, A4=0: two of the four unknowns are zero because the numerator x3 is odd, but they existed. Answering two unknowns because the result only shows two is exactly the mistake that counting unknowns is meant to prevent.
Exercise 15: The denominator you must factor first
So far, the denominators arrived already factored. In an exam they almost never are, and factoring is half the work: until it is done, you do not even know how many terms the answer will have. The five denominators of this exercise cover the five tools to know: taking out a common factor, the difference of squares, the change of unknown X=x2, the difference of cubes and the Sophie Germain identity.
A trap lies in wait from the first question, and it has nothing to do with factoring: once the denominator is factored, the numerator sometimes cancels with one of the factors. You must simplify BEFORE setting up the form, or you will be handling a pole that no longer exists.
a) Decompose A(x)=x3−4x2x. Watch out for a cancellation.
b) Decompose B(x)=x4−161.
c) Decompose C(x)=x4+x2−2x2+1 by setting X=x2.
d) Check that x4+64=(x2+4x+8)(x2−4x+8), then decompose D(x)=x4+644x.
e) Decompose E(x)=x3−1x3+1.
Show the solution
Answers
a)2(x−2)1−2(x+2)1, 0 stays excluded
b)32(x−2)1−32(x+2)1−8(x2+4)1
c)3(x−1)1−3(x+1)1+3(x2+2)1
d)2(x2−4x+8)1−2(x2+4x+8)1
e)1+3(x−1)2−3(x2+x+1)2(x+2)
a)
x3−4x=x(x2−4)=x(x−2)(x+2), so A(x)=x(x−2)(x+2)2x=(x−2)(x+2)2 for every x other than 0, 2 and −2. The factor x cancels with the numerator, and only two poles remain. Cover-up at 2: 2+22=21. Cover-up at −2: −2−22=−21. So A(x)=2(x−2)1−2(x+2)1. A detail worth marks: the value 0 stays excluded from the domain of A, even though it has disappeared from the simplified expression. If you refuse to simplify and set up xA1+x−2A2+x+2A3, you find A1=0 and the same result, at the cost of a useless system.
b)
x4−16=(x2−4)(x2+4)=(x−2)(x+2)(x2+4), with Δ=−16<0 for the last factor. Form: x−2A1+x+2A2+x2+4A3x+A4, four unknowns for degree 4. Cover-up at 2: A1=(2+2)(4+4)1=321. Cover-up at −2: A2=(−4)(8)1=−321. In the identity 1=A1(x+2)(x2+4)+A2(x−2)(x2+4)+(A3x+A4)(x2−4), the coefficient of x3 gives 0=A1+A2+A3, so A3=0; the constant term gives 1=8A1−8A2−4A4=41+41−4A4, so A4=−81. So B(x)=32(x−2)1−32(x+2)1−8(x2+4)1.
c)
With X=x2: X2+X−2=(X+2)(X−1), so x4+x2−2=(x2+2)(x2−1)=(x2+2)(x−1)(x+1). The factor x2+2 has discriminant −8<0. Form: x−1A1+x+1A2+x2+2A3x+A4. Cover-up at 1: A1=3×22=31. Cover-up at −1: A2=3×(−2)2=−31. Coefficient of x3: 0=A1+A2+A3, so A3=0. Constant term: 1=2A1−2A2−A4=32+32−A4, so A4=31. So C(x)=3(x−1)1−3(x+1)1+3(x2+2)1. Check at x=0: on the left −21, on the right −31−31+61=−21.
d)
Expand: (x2+4x+8)(x2−4x+8)=(x2+8)2−(4x)2=x4+16x2+64−16x2=x4+64. This is the Sophie Germain identity, x4+4a4=(x2+2ax+2a2)(x2−2ax+2a2) with a=2. Both quadratics have discriminant 16−32=−16<0, both irreducible. Form: x2−4x+8A1x+A2+x2+4x+8A3x+A4. Expanding 4x=(A1x+A2)(x2+4x+8)+(A3x+A4)(x2−4x+8): the coefficient of x3 gives A1+A3=0; the constant term gives 8A2+8A4=0, so A4=−A2; the coefficient of x2 gives 4A1+A2−4A3+A4=8A1=0, so A1=A3=0; the coefficient of x gives 8A1+4A2+8A3−4A4=8A2=4, so A2=21 and A4=−21. So D(x)=2(x2−4x+8)1−2(x2+4x+8)1. Check at x=1: on the left 654, on the right 101−261=13013−5=1308=654.
e)
The two degrees are equal, so divide first: x3+1=(x3−1)+2, hence E(x)=1+x3−12. Then x3−1=(x−1)(x2+x+1), with Δ=1−4=−3<0. Cover-up at 1: A1=1+1+12=32. In 2=A1(x2+x+1)+(A2x+A3)(x−1), the coefficient of x2 gives 0=A1+A2, so A2=−32; the constant term gives 2=A1−A3=32−A3, so A3=−34. So E(x)=1+3(x−1)2−3(x2+x+1)2(x+2). Check at x=2: on the left 79, on the right 1+32−218=2121+14−8=2127=79.
Exercise 16: Giving the form without computing a single coefficient
Same instruction as on the worksheets that ask for the form of the decomposition without finding the unknowns: you write the terms, not the values. The question is worth a lot and takes one minute, provided you take nothing on trust. Every quadratic goes through the discriminant, every pair of degrees is compared, and counting the unknowns serves as the final check.
The six denominators below each contain a different trap: a fake irreducible quadratic, a numerator that is too big, a squared quadratic, a non-monic factor, a perfect square disguised as a quadratic, and a full stack. That is exactly the sample you meet in a theory question.
a) Give the form of the decomposition of (x2−9)2(x2+4)2x+1 and of (x−1)3(x+2)x5.
b) Same instruction for x2(x2+x+1)23 and for (2x−1)(x2+2x+5)x2−1.
c) Same instruction for (x2−2x+1)(x2−2x+5)7x and for x(x2−4)(x2+4)21.
d) For each of the six, count the unknowns and compare with the degree of the denominator.
e) For each of the six, name the trap placed in it.
Show the solution
Answers
a)x−3A+(x−3)2B+x+3C+(x+3)2D+x2+4Ex+F; ax+b then 4 terms
x2−9=(x−3)(x+3), discriminant 36>0: this is not an irreducible quadratic, and the denominator is (x−3)2(x+3)2(x2+4), of degree 6. Since x2+4 has discriminant −16<0, the form is x−3A+(x−3)2B+x+3C+(x+3)2D+x2+4Ex+F. For the second, the denominator has degree 4 and the numerator degree 5: you must divide first. The form is ax+b+x−1A+(x−1)2B+(x−1)3C+x+2D, with a quotient of degree 5−4=1.
b)
x2 is a repeated factor of order 2, and x2+x+1 has discriminant 1−4=−3<0: irreducible, squared, so two terms with linear numerators. The denominator has degree 6 and the form is xA+x2B+x2+x+1Cx+D+(x2+x+1)2Ex+F. For the second, x2+2x+5 has discriminant 4−20=−16<0, and the factor 2x−1 is linear even though it is not monic. Degree 3, numerator of degree 2, so no division, and the form is 2x−1A+x2+2x+5Bx+C.
c)
x2−2x+1 has discriminant 4−4=0: it is not an irreducible quadratic, it is the perfect square (x−1)2. The second, x2−2x+5, has discriminant 4−20=−16<0 and stays irreducible. Degree 4, and the form is x−1A+(x−1)2B+x2−2x+5Cx+D. For the last one, x2−4=(x−2)(x+2) and x2+4 is irreducible with Δ=−16<0, squared. The denominator has degree 1+2+4=7 and the form is xA+x−2B+x+2C+x2+4Dx+E+(x2+4)2Fx+G.
d)
In a): six unknowns for degree 6, then four unknowns plus the two coefficients of the quotient for degree 4. In b): six for degree 6, then three for degree 3. In c): four for degree 4, then seven for degree 7. Apart from the quotient, the number of unknowns always equals the degree of the denominator. The second fraction of a) is the only one where the two counts must be told apart: the coefficients of the quotient are not part of the fractional part, and it is indeed four unknowns that remain over (x−1)3(x+2).
e)
The six traps: a quadratic believed to be irreducible that is a difference of squares; a numerator of higher degree than the denominator, which requires a division that nothing in the notation signals; an irreducible quadratic squared, which opens two terms and not one; a non-monic linear factor, which you are tempted to treat as a quadratic; a perfect square with zero discriminant, which is neither irreducible nor a pair of distinct roots; and a stack of three kinds of factors, where what gets forgotten is almost always the second term of the repeated quadratic. None of these six traps can be seen without computing: the discriminant and the comparison of degrees are the only two tools that reveal them.
Something missing from this set?A type of exercise your teacher gives, a problem you are stuck on, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.
Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space.
Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.
Looking for an integral calculus tutor in Montreal?
Get in touch for a first session. We work on partial fraction decomposition at the level of real CEGEP tests, from polynomial long division all the way to repeated factors and irreducible quadratics.