Exercise 1: Polar coordinates and the arctangent pitfall
Going from Cartesian to polar takes two computations: a modulus, which never causes trouble, and an angle, which almost always does. The calculator returns , a value between and : it can therefore NEVER designate a point in the second or third quadrant.
- a) Give a polar representation of with and . Compare with what returns.
- b) Same question for and for .
- c) Give the Cartesian coordinates of the polar point .
- d) Write four distinct polar representations of the point , one of them with . What can you say about the pole?
- e) Prove that the distance between the polar points and is , then apply it to and .
Show the solution
Answers
- a) ; gives , wrong
- b) and
- c)
- d) , , ; the pole has infinitely many
- e) Law of cosines;
. The point is in the SECOND quadrant (, ). The calculator gives , which designates a point in the fourth quadrant: that is wrong. You must add : . Check: and .
For : , fourth quadrant, is correct, and in we write . For : , THIRD quadrant, , a first-quadrant value: once again you must add , hence . Rule: add whenever , whatever the sign of .
and . The Cartesian point is . This direction of conversion causes no difficulty at all: it is always the other one that sets the trap.
, , , and with : . The pole is an extreme case: designates the origin for EVERY , so it has uncountably many representations. That is precisely why it escapes systems of equations, as we will see in exercise 8.
In Cartesian coordinates, . Expanding: . This is the law of cosines in the triangle formed by the pole and the two points, the angle at the pole being . Application: , so .
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.