Exercise 1: Top minus bottom: a parabola and a line
The area of a region between two curves is built from thin vertical slices. At the position , the slice runs from the lower curve up to the upper one, so its length is , and the area is , where and are the ends of the region.
Let be the region enclosed by the parabola and the line , shaded in the figure. Part of the parabola lies below the -axis: keep an eye on what that changes, and on what it does not.
- a) Find the points where the two curves meet.
- b) Decide which curve is on top between those points, with a test value. Then explain why the fact that the parabola dips below the -axis plays no role in the set-up.
- c) Write the area of as one integral and evaluate it exactly.
- d) A student integrates over the same interval, finds and writes: the area is . What went wrong, and why does taking the absolute value at the end only work here by luck?
- e) Another student computes the area under the line minus the area under the parabola, using for the line and for the parabola (the geometric area between the parabola and the -axis), and gets . Find the mistake and show that the signed integrals give the right answer.
Show the solution
Answers
- a) and
- b) The line is on top on ; the slice length is a difference of heights, whatever their signs.
- c)
- d) Bottom minus top: the order was reversed. works only because the curves never cross inside .
- e) ; the geometric is wrong here.
a) Set the two heights equal: , so , which factors as . The curves meet at and . The points are and , and both check in BOTH equations: and . These two numbers are the bounds of the integral. On an exam, write the equation, the factored form and the list of roots: the set-up marks depend on them, and a bound read off a sketch is not a justification.
b) Take a test value inside , say : the line gives , the parabola gives , so the line is on top. Why one test is enough: the difference is continuous and vanishes only at and , so it cannot change sign in between. Now the -axis. The slice at has length , a DIFFERENCE of two heights. At the top is and the bottom is , and the slice has length , exactly what a ruler would measure from to . A negative bottom height is simply subtracted, which adds. Nothing in the formula refers to the axis, so there is no reason to split at or , where the parabola crosses it.
c) . At : . At : . So , a little under . Two checks that cost nothing. The longest slice is at , of length , and the region is wide, so must be below : it is. And Archimedes: a region cut from a parabola by a chord has of the enclosing rectangle, here , the same number.
d) The integrand is bottom minus top, negative at every point of , so the integral returns the area with a minus sign. An area is never negative: a negative result is an ALARM that the order was reversed, never an answer. Taking the absolute value at the end happens to give here, but only because the integrand keeps ONE sign on the whole interval, the curves never crossing inside it. As soon as they cross (Exercise 2), the positive and negative pieces cancel inside the integral, and no absolute value applied afterwards can undo that. The safe habit is the one of part b): decide top and bottom FIRST, with a test value, on each piece.
e) The signed integrals are and . Their difference is , the right answer. The student replaced by the GEOMETRIC area between the parabola and the axis, , where the middle comes from , BELOW the axis. On that stretch the slice of goes from the negative height of the parabola up to the line: that piece must be ADDED to the area under the line, and the signed integral does exactly that, since subtracting its negative contribution adds . Subtracting it instead costs , and indeed . Moral: needs no case analysis for the -axis; only the crossings of the two curves matter.