Exercise 1: Choosing u and dv: the new integral is the judge
Integration by parts is the product rule read backwards: from comes . The formula does not compute anything. It TRADES the integral you have for another one, , and the whole skill is to choose so that the new integral is easier than the old one.
Two requirements decide the choice: must be something you can integrate, and should be the factor that becomes SIMPLER when differentiated. In every part, write the four pieces , , , before the formula.
- a) Compute with and .
- b) Redo the first step with the opposite choice, and . Is the resulting equation false? Why is it useless?
- c) Compute . Explain why here the polynomial must be and not .
- d) Compute , and name the two wrong antiderivatives of that students write for .
- e) Check the answers to a) and c) by differentiating them.
Show the solution
Answers
- a)
- b) : true, but the power went UP.
- c)
- d) ; wrong : and .
- e) Both derivatives give back the integrand: and .
a) , ; , (a substitution you do at sight: the derivative of is ). Then . The trade was good: the new integral, , has lost the factor and is immediate. That is the test of a choice, and it can be run BEFORE finishing the computation: differentiating gives , and the power of disappears.
b) , ; , . The formula gives . This equation is TRUE: parts never produces a false identity. It is useless because the new integral carries where the old one carried : the trade went the wrong way, and applying parts again with the same choice would give , then , forever. When the integral you get is worse than the one you had, stop after one line and swap and : that decision, written down, is worth marks on its own.
c) , ; , . Then . Here the polynomial must be , against the habit built in part a). Taking would require an antiderivative of just to START, and would leave , which contains again. Differentiating , on the other hand, turns it into , which cancels against : the logarithm is the factor that simplifies, so it is . The rule of thumb LIATE (logarithm, inverse trigonometric, algebraic, trigonometric, exponential, in that order of preference for ) says the same thing, but the reason is the new integral, not the mnemonic.
d) , ; , , because . Then . The two classic wrong values of : , copied from (its derivative is , off by the factor ), and , the power rule applied to a variable EXPONENT, which is not a power function at all. Both errors propagate: appears twice, once in and once in , which is why the correct answer carries to the first power AND to the second.
e) For a): . For c): . Both are confirmed. This check costs thirty seconds and is the only way, on an exam without a calculator, to know that an antiderivative is right; it catches a lost factor or a sign in immediately. Notice that the product rule, used to check, is exactly the rule that parts runs backwards.