Answers
- a) (i) −21cos(x2); (ii) none; (iii) none; (iv) xex; (v) none; (vi) −e1/x
- b) ∫(1+2x2)ex2dx=xex2+C; the value is e.
- c) e−ln22, negative because lnx<1 on [2,e)
- d) 34≤∫01ex2dx≤3e+2≈1.57
- e) It exists (continuous integrand); dxd∫1x2tetdt=x2ex2
a) (i) The factor x is half the derivative of x2: u=x2 gives −21cos(x2)+C. (ii) The same composition without the factor x: no elementary antiderivative, and no technique will find one. (iii) None, it is on the list. (iv) It LOOKS like (iii) made worse, yet dxdxex=x2xex−ex=x2(x−1)ex: the antiderivative is xex+C. Splitting it into xex−x2ex would produce two non-elementary pieces that happen to combine, which is exactly the phenomenon of b). (v) None, on the list. (vi) u=x1, du=−x2dx: −e1/x+C. The test is again the derivative of the inner function: x2 has derivative 2x, present in (i) and absent in (ii); x1 has derivative −x21, present in (vi).
b) Split: ∫(1+2x2)ex2dx=∫ex2dx+∫2x2ex2dx. In the second, write 2x2ex2=x⋅2xex2 and integrate by parts with u=x, dv=2xex2dx, so du=dx and v=ex2: ∫2x2ex2dx=xex2−∫ex2dx. Adding, the two copies of ∫ex2dx cancel: ∫(1+2x2)ex2dx=xex2+C. Check: dxdxex2=ex2+2x2ex2. So ∫01(1+2x2)ex2dx=[xex2]01=e. Never write ∫ex2dx and stop: carry it as an unevaluated symbol, it may cancel.
c) Integrate ∫lnxdx by parts with u=lnx1, dv=dx: du=−(lnx)21⋅x1dx and v=x, so ∫lnxdx=lnxx+∫(lnx)2dx. Subtracting ∫(lnx)2dx from both sides: ∫(lnx1−(lnx)21)dx=lnxx+C. The interval [2,e] avoids x=1, where lnx=0. Value: lnee−ln22=e−ln22. Sign: on [2,e), 0<lnx<1, so (lnx)2<lnx and lnx1<(lnx)21; the integrand is negative and so is the value, e−ln22≈2.72−0.692≈−0.17.
d) Lower bound: with u=x2, ex2≥1+x2, the dashed curve of the figure, so ∫01ex2dx≥∫01(1+x2)dx=1+31=34. Upper bound: for x∈[0,1], u=x2∈[0,1] and ex2≤1+(e−1)x2, the chord curve, which meets ex2 at x=0 and x=1. So ∫01ex2dx≤1+3e−1=3e+2≈1.57. The bracket [1.33,1.57] is much sharper than the crude [1,e] of exercise 5, and it uses nothing but comparison of integrals: this is what can still be said about a non-elementary integral in MATH 141 without series, which come later in the course.
e) The integrand xex is continuous on [1,2], so the definite integral EXISTS: it is a perfectly good number, the area under the curve. What does not exist is a closed-form expression for it. The function F(x)=∫1xtetdt is well defined for x>0 and, by the Fundamental Theorem, F′(x)=xex. With the chain rule, dxd∫1x2tetdt=x2ex2⋅2x=x2ex2. Not elementary never means not integrable.