Corrected exercises: the ratio and root tests, and choosing a test (MATH 141)
This is the corrected exercise set for the ratio test, the root test and the strategy for testing series in MATH 141, Calculus 2, the second calculus course at McGill University, sections 11.6 and 11.7 of Stewart. Every limit is computed by hand and every value is exact: e1, 3e, 4π, 409. The solutions name each test, write each ratio in full before simplifying it, and check each hypothesis on the page, because on this chapter a verdict without its test scores nothing.
The thread running through the whole set: the ratio and root tests compare a series with a GEOMETRIC one, and they read only the LIMIT L. L<1 gives absolute convergence, L>1 gives divergence of the series itself because its terms do not even tend to 0, and L=1 says nothing at all. So the test is chosen by the form of the general term before any computation: factorials, products, constants to the power n and recursions for the ratio test; a term raised to the power n for the root test; a rational or algebraic term, where L=1 is guaranteed, for a comparison.
The traps named explicitly in the solutions: (2n)!(2n+2)! written as 2n+2, the form 1∞ read as 1, a ratio below 1 for every n taken for a limit below 1, a few first terms taken for a verdict, L=1 read as divergence, L>1 followed by a search for conditional convergence, L taken for the ratio of a geometric sum, the alternating series test used where the absolute series already converges, the ratio test used on a ratio that has no limit, and cosn taken for (−1)n.
Self-checking setType your answers and check them question by question: the page tells you right or wrong before you open the solution. With an account, every answer right on the first try earns points, and your right answers stay filled in when you come back.
•Ratio test: if limn→∞anan+1=L, then L<1 gives absolute convergence, L>1 (or ∞) divergence, L=1 no information.
•Root test: the same three conclusions with L=limn→∞n∣an∣.
•Factorials: (n+1)!=(n+1)n!, (2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!, and (kn+k)! has k more factors than (kn)!.
•Limits used constantly: (1+n1)n→e, (n+1n)n→e1, nn→1, nc→1 for c>0.
•If an is rational or algebraic in n, both tests give L=1: use a limit comparison with a p-series instead.
•Strategy, in order: terms tend to 0? known series? factorials or cn (ratio)? n-th power (root)? algebraic (comparison)? alternating (∣an∣ first, then the AST)? easy integral (integral test)?
Part A: the basics (/50)
Exercise 1: The ratio test: simplify the quotient before taking the limit
The ratio test. Let ∑an be a series with nonzero terms and suppose L=limn→∞anan+1 exists (a finite number or ∞). If L<1, the series converges absolutely; if L>1 or L=∞, it diverges; if L=1, the test gives no information. The idea: when L<1, the terms eventually shrink at least as fast as those of a geometric series of ratio r with L<r<1.
The whole difficulty is algebraic. anan+1 is a quotient of two quotients, and the factorials and powers must be cancelled BEFORE the limit is taken: (n+1)!=(n+1)⋅n!, (2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1)⋅(2n)!, 3n+1=3⋅3n. The figure shows the first fifteen ratios anan+1 for an=3nn3.
a) Apply the ratio test to ∑n=1∞3nn3.
b) Same question for ∑n=1∞n!100n. The terms increase up to n=99: does that matter?
c) Same question for ∑n=1∞(2n)!(n!)2.
d) Same question for ∑n=1∞nnn!.
e) On the figure, the first two ratios are above 1, so a1<a2<a3. Explain why this does not contradict a), and what the test actually reads.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=31<1: converges (absolutely).
b)L=0<1: converges; the first 99 terms are irrelevant.
c)L=41<1: converges.
d)L=e1<1: converges.
e)Only the LIMIT of the ratios counts; finitely many ratios above 1 change finitely many terms, never the verdict.
a)
Terms positive, so no absolute values are needed. anan+1=3n+1(n+1)3⋅n33n=31(nn+1)3=31(1+n1)3. As n→∞, 1+n1→1, so L=31. Since L<1, the series converges by the ratio test. The gesture that earns the mark is the rewriting 3n+13n=31 and n3(n+1)3=(1+n1)3 BEFORE the limit: the powers of n contribute a factor that tends to 1, the exponential contributes the whole of L. That is the general pattern: a polynomial factor never changes the value of L.
b)
anan+1=(n+1)!100n+1⋅100nn!=n+1100, using (n+1)!=(n+1)⋅n!. So L=limn→∞n+1100=0<1: the series converges. The ratio is ≥1 exactly when n+1≤100, so the terms increase up to a99=a100 and only then decrease, and the terms around n=100 are astronomically large. None of this matters: convergence is a property of the TAIL of the series, and removing or changing finitely many terms changes the sum but never whether it exists. The factorial grows faster than any geometric sequence, however large its base, and the ratio test shows it in one line.
c)
anan+1=(2n+2)!((n+1)!)2⋅(n!)2(2n)!=(2n+2)(2n+1)(n+1)2, because n!(n+1)!=n+1 (squared) and (2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!. Simplify: 2(n+1)(2n+1)(n+1)2=2(2n+1)n+1→41 (divide top and bottom by n: 4+2/n1+1/n). L=41<1: converges. The classic slip is (2n)!(2n+2)!=2n+2: going from (2n)! to (2n+2)! adds TWO factors, and forgetting (2n+1) gives a limit of ∞ and the opposite verdict.
d)
anan+1=(n+1)n+1(n+1)!⋅n!nn=(n+1)n+1(n+1)nn=(n+1)nnn=(n+1n)n=(1+n1)n1. The limit (1+n1)n→e is the one of the sequences chapter, so L=e1, about 2.721≈0.37<1: converges. The trap here is the form 1∞: n+1n→1, and writing (n+1n)n→1∞=1 would give L=1 and a false no information. The exponent grows with n, so the base tending to 1 decides nothing; the limit is e−1.
e)
The terms are a1=31, a2=98, a3=1, then a4=8164 and they decrease: the ratios 38 and 89 are above 1, the third, 8164, is below. There is no contradiction: the ratio test reads the LIMIT of the ratios, which is 31, and the proof only uses the ratios from some rank N on. On the figure, from n=3 on every ratio is below 1 and they settle on the dashed line at 31. A student who stops at a1a2=38>1 and concludes divergence has read one ratio instead of a limit, which the test never allows.
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.
Exercise 2: The root test: when the whole term is raised to the power n
The root test. If L=limn→∞n∣an∣ exists, then L<1 gives absolute convergence, L>1 (or ∞) gives divergence, and L=1 gives no information. It is the natural test when an is an expression raised to the power n, because nbnn=∣bn∣ removes the exponent at once. Two limits from the sequences chapter are used constantly: nn=n1/n→1 and nc→1 for every c>0.
The figure shows the first twelve terms of an=(3n+12n+3)n and the curve y=0.8x.
a) Apply the root test to ∑n=1∞(3n+12n+3)n.
b) Same question for ∑n=1∞3n1(1+n1)n2.
c) Same question for ∑n=1∞n102n. The terms are below 1 for 2≤n≤58: what does that prove?
d) Same question for ∑n=1∞2n(arctann)n.
e) For the series of a), find the smallest N such that an<(54)n for every n≥N, and use it to prove convergence with no test at all, only a comparison with a geometric series.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=32<1: converges.
b)L=3e<1: converges.
c)L=2>1: diverges; the first 58 terms prove nothing.
d)L=4π<1: converges.
e)N=6; ∑n≥6an≤∑n≥6(54)n=4(54)5, so the series converges.
a)
The terms are positive. nan=3n+12n+3=3+1/n2+3/n→32. L=32<1: the series converges by the root test. With the ratio test the same series would require the quotient of (3n+42n+5)n+1 by (3n+12n+3)n, a 1∞ form that is painful to settle. The form of the term, a fraction raised to the power n, chose the test.
b)
nan=31(1+n1)n2/n=31(1+n1)n→3e. Since e<3, L=3e<1, about 0.91: converges. Two traps. The exponent: (bn2)1/n=bn, not b; the n-th root divides the exponent by n, it does not remove it. And the limit: (1+n1)n is a 1∞ form whose limit is e, not 1. Note that (1+n1)n2 alone tends to infinity: the series converges only because 3n grows faster, and e<3 is exactly the comparison that decides.
c)
nan=(n1/n)102→1102=2, since n1/n→1. L=2>1: DIVERGES. The terms start at a1=2, fall below 1 from n=2 (a2=10244) and stay below 1 until n=58, because 2n<n10 there; from n=59 on, 2n>n10 and the terms grow without bound. A table of the first fifty terms would suggest convergence, and it proves nothing: no finite number of terms decides a series. The power n10, however large its exponent, contributes (n1/n)10→1 to L.
d)
nan=2arctann, and arctann→2π as n→∞, so L=4π. Since π<4, L<1 (about 0.79): converges. The limit 2π is exact; no decimal of arctan is needed. Note that each root 2arctann is below 4π, and the test does not care: only the limit is compared with 1.
e)
an<(54)n is equivalent, taking n-th roots of positive numbers, to 3n+12n+3<54, that is 5(2n+3)<4(3n+1), 10n+15<12n+4, n>211. So N=6: the inequality holds for all n≥6 and fails at n=5, where 1613>54 (on the figure, the points pass under the curve at n=6). Then 0<an<(54)n for n≥6, and ∑n=6∞(54)n=1−4/5(4/5)6=5(54)6=4(54)5 is a convergent geometric series; by comparison the tail converges, and adding the five first terms does not change that. This IS the proof of the root test: any r strictly between L and 1 works, here r=54 between 32 and 1. It also explains why L=1 gives nothing: then no fixed r<1 can be squeezed in.
Exercise 3: L = 1: the case where both tests are silent
When the limit is exactly 1, neither the ratio test nor the root test says anything: there are series with L=1 that converge and series with L=1 that diverge. The only correct sentence is then the test is inconclusive, followed by ANOTHER test. The figure shows the ratios anan+1 for an=n1 and for an=n21, with the line y=1 dashed.
a) Compute the ratio limit and the root limit for ∑n1 and for ∑n21. What are the two verdicts, and which tests give them?
b) For ∑n1, every ratio n+1n is strictly less than 1. Why is that not a proof of convergence?
c) Let an=Q(n)P(n) where P and Q are polynomials, positive for n≥1. Show that the ratio test always gives L=1. What should be used instead?
d) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞n2+1n.
e) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞(n+2n+1)n, first trying the root test.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=1 in all four cases; ∑n1 diverges and ∑n21 converges, both by the p-series test.
b)The ratios tend to 1: no fixed r<1 bounds them, so no geometric comparison exists.
c)P(n)P(n+1)→1 and Q(n+1)Q(n)→1, so L=1; use limit comparison with nq−p1.
d)Converges: limit comparison with n3/21, p=23>1.
e)Root test gives 1; an→e1=0, so it diverges by the divergence test.
a)
For an=n1: anan+1=n+1n→1 and nan=n1/n1→1. For an=n21: anan+1=(n+1n)2→1 and nan=(n1/n)21→1. Four limits equal to 1, so both tests are inconclusive for both series. The verdicts come from the p-series test: ∑n1 diverges (p=1) and ∑n21 converges (p=2>1). On the figure the two families of ratios are indistinguishable in the limit, and yet the series behave oppositely: this is the proof that L=1 cannot carry a verdict.
b)
The ratio test needs the LIMIT to be below 1, not each ratio. The proof of the test works with a fixed r such that anan+1≤r<1 for all large n, which gives an≤aNrn−N and a geometric comparison. Here the ratios 21,32,43,… creep up to 1 and eventually exceed every fixed r<1: the terms do decrease, but more and more slowly, not geometrically, and the harmonic series diverges. Writing the ratio is less than 1, so it converges is the most frequent wrong line on this chapter and it scores zero.
c)
Say P has degree p and leading coefficient b, Q has degree q and leading coefficient c. Then anan+1=P(n)P(n+1)⋅Q(n+1)Q(n). Dividing top and bottom by np, P(n)P(n+1)→bb=1, because (n+1)p and np have the same leading behaviour; likewise Q(n+1)Q(n)→1. So L=1 for EVERY rational term, whatever the degrees: the ratio test is always wasted on it, and so is the root test. The right tool is a limit comparison with nq−p1, the ratio of the leading terms, and then the p-series test: convergence exactly when q−p>1. Recognising the form saves the whole computation.
d)
The term is algebraic in n, so by c) the ratio test would give 1. Dominant terms: n2+1n behaves like n2n1/2=n3/21. Limit comparison with bn=n3/21, both positive: bnan=n2+1n1/2⋅n3/2=n2+1n2→1, a finite positive number. Since ∑n3/21 converges (p=23>1), the series converges. The hypotheses checked on the copy: positive terms, a limit that is finite AND nonzero.
e)
nan=n+2n+1→1: the root test is inconclusive. Every root is below 1, which again means nothing. Go back to the first question of any strategy: do the terms tend to 0? Write n+2n+1=1−n+21, so an=(1−n+21)n+2⋅(1−n+21)−2. The first factor tends to e−1 (the limit (1+mx)m→ex with x=−1, m=n+2) and the second to 1. So an→e1=0 and the series DIVERGES by the divergence test. A term to the power n invited the root test, and the root test was silent; the 1∞ form of the term itself was the information.
Exercise 4: Signs: the tests measure the absolute value, and L > 1 means the terms grow
Both tests are stated with ∣an∣. When L<1 they give ABSOLUTE convergence, which implies convergence: no alternating series test is needed. When L>1 they give more than the divergence of ∑∣an∣: they give the divergence of ∑an itself. The figure shows the first seven values of ∣an∣=n44n.
a) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞(−1)nn4n3n.
b) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞n4(−4)n, and use the figure to say what the terms do.
c) Decide whether ∑n=1∞3n(−1)n converges absolutely, conditionally, or diverges.
d) Prove that if limn→∞anan+1=L>1, then an does not tend to 0. Why can a series with L>1 never be conditionally convergent?
e) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞(−1)n1⋅3⋅5⋯(2n−1)n!.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=43<1: absolutely convergent.
b)L=4>1: diverges; ∣an∣ dips to 8164 at n=3, then increases for ever.
c)Conditionally convergent: both tests give 1, the AST gives convergence, p=31 gives divergence of ∑∣an∣.
d)From some N on, ∣an+1∣>∣an∣>0, so ∣an∣≥∣aN∣>0; the series diverges by the divergence test.
e)L=21<1: absolutely convergent.
a)
anan+1=(n+1)4n+13n+1⋅3nn4n=43⋅n+1n→43. L=43<1: the series converges ABSOLUTELY, hence converges. The sign (−1)n disappears in the absolute value; there is no need to check that the terms decrease or to invoke the alternating series test, and doing so costs time without earning a mark. The correct conclusion names absolute convergence, which is stronger than convergence.
b)
anan+1=(n+1)44n+1⋅4nn4=4(n+1n)4→4. L=4>1: the series DIVERGES. On the figure, ∣a1∣=4, ∣a2∣=1, ∣a3∣=8164, ∣a4∣=1, then 6251024, 81256, and the terms keep growing. The ratio 4(n+1n)4 is above 1 as soon as 2n>n+1 (take fourth roots: 41/4=2), that is n>2−11=2+1, so from n=3 on each term is larger in absolute value than the previous one. The terms, far from tending to 0, tend to infinity in absolute value, while the signs alternate: it is not an alternating series question at all.
c)
anan+1=(n+1n)1/3→1 and n∣an∣=n−1/(3n)→1: both tests are inconclusive. Alternating series test with bn=3n1: bn>0, bn+1<bn because the cube root is increasing, and bn→0. So ∑3n(−1)n converges. Absolute series: ∑n1/31 is a p-series with p=31≤1, it diverges. The series is CONDITIONALLY convergent. The ratio test, silent here, can never detect conditional convergence: it only ever sees ∣an∣.
d)
Choose r with 1<r<L (for instance r=21+L; if L=∞ take r=2). Since the ratios tend to L, there is N such that anan+1>r>1 for all n≥N. Then ∣an+1∣>∣an∣ for n≥N, so ∣an∣≥∣aN∣>0 for all n≥N (in fact ∣an∣≥∣aN∣rn−N→∞). The terms do not tend to 0, and ∑an diverges by the divergence test, whatever the signs. Conditional convergence requires ∑an to converge, hence an→0: impossible here. So after a ratio or root limit above 1, the conclusion is simply diverges, never let us try the alternating series test.
e)
Write an=(−1)n1⋅3⋯(2n−1)n!. Going from n to n+1 multiplies the numerator by n+1 and the denominator by the next odd number, 2n+1: anan+1=2n+1n+1→21. L=21<1: absolutely convergent. Terms defined by a product with a growing number of factors are the ratio test's home ground: the product collapses to its last factor. Writing both products out to their last factors, 1⋅3⋯(2n−1)(2n+1) over 1⋅3⋯(2n−1), is what makes the cancellation visible. Confusing the odd product with (2n)! adds a spurious factor 2n+2 and gives L=0: the right verdict for a wrong reason, which loses the method mark.
Exercise 5: Ratio or root: recursions, oscillating ratios and n-th powers of factorials
The ratio test is made for terms that are built one from the previous, by a recursion or a product; the root test for terms raised to the power n. Both tests require the limit to EXIST: a ratio that oscillates without settling puts the ratio test out of play, and another tool must take over.
a) Let a1=2 and an+1=4n+35n+1an for n≥1. Decide the convergence of ∑an.
b) Let a1=1 and an+1=n2+cosnan. Decide the convergence of ∑an.
c) Show that the ratio test does not apply to ∑n=1∞3n2+(−1)n. Decide its convergence with the root test, then find its sum.
d) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞3nn!nn.
e) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞nn2(n!)n.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=45>1: diverges (the terms stay ≥712).
b)0<anan+1≤n3, so L=0: converges.
c)The ratios alternate between 1 and 91; the root test gives L=31: converges, sum 43.
d)L=3e<1: converges.
e)Root test: nan=nnn!≤n1→0: converges.
a)
No formula for an is needed: the recursion gives the ratio directly. a1>0 and the factor 4n+35n+1 is positive, so all terms are positive, and anan+1=4n+35n+1→45>1: the series DIVERGES by the ratio test. As in Exercise 4 d), the terms themselves confirm it: the factor is ≥1 as soon as 5n+1≥4n+3, i.e. n≥2, so a2=712, a3=1111a2=712, and the terms never go below 712 afterwards. A recursive definition is the clearest signal of the ratio test on a paper: the quotient is written in the statement.
b)
Since −1≤cosn≤1, the factor satisfies 0<n1≤n2+cosn≤n3, so all terms are positive. The ratio anan+1=n2+cosn has no simple formula for its limit, because cosn itself has no limit, but it is squeezed: 0<anan+1≤n3→0. By the squeeze theorem L=0<1 and the series converges. The oscillating numerator is harmless because it is BOUNDED and divided by something that goes to infinity; the squeeze is the sentence that makes the limit legitimate.
c)
The terms are an=3n1 for odd n and an=3n3 for even n. For odd n: anan+1=1/3n3/3n+1=1; for even n: anan+1=3/3n1/3n+1=91. The ratios alternate 1,91,1,91,…: they have no limit, so the ratio test does not apply (and certainly does not say diverges because some ratios equal 1). Root test: nan=3(2+(−1)n)1/n, and 1≤(2+(−1)n)1/n≤31/n→1, so by the squeeze theorem L=31<1: converges. The sum: ∑n=1∞3n2+∑n=1∞(−31)n=2⋅1−1/31/3+1+1/3−1/3=1−41=43, splitting being legitimate because both geometric series converge. The root test is the stronger of the two: whenever the ratio limit exists the root limit exists and is equal, but not conversely.
d)
anan+1=3n+1(n+1)!(n+1)n+1⋅nn3nn!=31⋅(n+1)nn(n+1)n+1=31(nn+1)n=31(1+n1)n→3e. Since e<3, L<1: converges. The root test would need nn!, which is not available in this course; the factorial chose the ratio test. The cancellation to watch: (n+1)n+1=(n+1)(n+1)n and (n+1)!=(n+1)n!, so the two factors n+1 cancel.
e)
The whole term is an n-th power: an=(nnn!)n, since nn2=(nn)n. Root test: nan=nnn!. Bound it: nnn!=n1⋅n2⋯nn≤n1, since each factor after the first is at most 1. So 0<nan≤n1→0, L=0: converges. The ratio test on this term would involve (n!)n((n+1)!)n+1 and (n+1)(n+1)2, a page of algebra; the exponent n on the whole term chose the root test in one line.
Part B: problems and reasoning (/50)
Exercise 6: Strategy: name the form, name the test, check its hypotheses
On a final exam the series comes without a chapter title. The work is to READ the general term before computing anything: do the terms tend to 0? Is it a known series? Does it contain factorials, products or constants to the power n (ratio test), is it raised to the power n (root test), is it rational or algebraic in n (comparison), do its signs alternate (absolute value first, then the alternating series test)? Each verdict below must name its test and verify that test's hypotheses on the page.
For each series, say whether it converges absolutely, converges conditionally, or diverges.
a) ∑n=1∞n3+nn3+1
b) ∑n=1∞(−1)nnlnn
c) ∑n=1∞(1.01)nn100
d) ∑n=1∞2n2nn
e) ∑n=1∞n2arctann
Show the solution
Answers
a)Converges (absolutely): limit comparison with n3/21.
b)Conditionally convergent: AST from n=8 on, and nlnn≥n1 for n≥3.
c)Converges (absolutely): ratio test, L=1.011<1.
d)Converges (absolutely): root test, L=lim2nn=0.
e)Converges (absolutely): 0<n2arctann<2n2π.
a)
Form: algebraic in n, a root of a polynomial over a polynomial. By Exercise 3 c) the ratio test would give 1, so go straight to a comparison. Dominant terms: n3n3/2=n3/21. Limit comparison with bn=n3/21, both sequences positive: bnan=n3+nn3/2n3+1=1+1/n21+1/n3→1, finite and nonzero. ∑n3/21 converges (p=23>1), so the series converges; its terms are positive, so the convergence is absolute.
b)
Form: alternating, with bn=nlnn (the term n=1 is 0). First, the absolute series: for n≥3, lnn≥1 so nlnn≥n1, and ∑n1 diverges (p=21): by direct comparison ∑∣an∣ diverges, and the ratio or root test would only have said L=1. Then the alternating series test on bn. Limit: xlnx→0 by L'Hôpital, 1/(2x)1/x=x2→0. Decrease: with f(x)=xlnx, f′(x)=2x3/22−lnx, negative for x>e2, about 7.4. So bn is decreasing from n=8 on, which is enough: the test applies to the tail ∑n≥8, and finitely many terms do not change convergence. Conclusion: CONDITIONALLY convergent. The decrease only from a certain rank must be said, with the rank; claiming it for all n is false (b2<b3, since 2ln2≈0.49 and 3ln3≈0.63).
c)
Form: a power of n against a constant to the power n. Ratio test, positive terms: anan+1=(nn+1)1001.011→1.011<1: converges. The terms grow for a very long time, as long as (1+n1)100>1.01, that is for n up to about ten thousand, and reach enormous values: irrelevant, as in Exercise 1 b). Any power of n loses against any geometric growth of base greater than 1, and the ratio test says so in one line because the polynomial factor contributes 1 to L.
d)
Form: 2n2=(2n)n, so the whole term is an n-th power, an=(2nn)n. Root test, positive terms: nan=2nn→0 (by L'Hôpital on 2xx: 2xln21→0). L=0<1: converges. The exponent n2 is the signal, and the classic slip is n2n2=2n written as 2n2−n or as 2: an n-th root divides the exponent by n.
e)
Form: a bounded function of n over n2. The ratio test would give L=1 (the arctangent ratio tends to 1 and (n+1)2n2→1): useless. Direct comparison: for n≥1, 0<arctann<2π, so 0<n2arctann<2π⋅n21, and ∑2n2π converges (p=2, times a constant). The inequality goes in the direction that concludes: SMALLER than a convergent series. The series converges, absolutely since its terms are positive. The figure below sums up the order in which the form was read in the five parts.
Exercise 7: Look-alike pairs: the same shape, two different tests
Each pair below contains two series that look almost identical. They do NOT call for the same test, and in every pair the two verdicts differ. For each series, name the test, check its hypotheses and conclude. The point of the exercise is the reason the test changes from one series to its twin.
a) ∑n=1∞arctann1 and ∑n=1∞n1arctann1.
b) ∑n=1∞(2n+1n+1)n and ∑n=1∞(2n2n+1)n.
c) ∑n=1∞(n+2)!n! and ∑n=1∞(n+2)!2nn!.
d) ∑n=1∞n2/3cos(nπ) and ∑n=1∞2ncosn.
e) ∑n=2∞(lnn)21 and ∑n=2∞(lnn)n1.
Show the solution
Answers
a)First diverges, second converges: limit comparison with n1, then with n21.
b)First converges (root test, L=21); second diverges (root test silent, an→e=0).
c)First converges to 21 (telescoping); second diverges (ratio test, L=2).
d)First conditionally convergent (AST); second absolutely convergent (comparison with 2n1).
e)First diverges ((lnn)21>n1); second converges (root test, L=0).
a)
Both have positive terms and arctann1→0. The key limit is limx→0xarctanx=1 (L'Hôpital: 11/(1+x2)→1). First series: limit comparison with n1, 1/narctan(1/n)→1, and ∑n1 diverges, so ∑arctann1 DIVERGES. Second: limit comparison with n21, 1/n2(1/n)arctan(1/n)=1/narctan(1/n)→1, and ∑n21 converges, so it CONVERGES. The ratio test gives 1 on both, as on every term that behaves like a power of n: the extra factor n1 changes the comparison series, not the test.
b)
Both are n-th powers, so the root test first. First: nan=2n+1n+1→21<1: CONVERGES. Second: nan=2n2n+1→1: inconclusive, and every root is ABOVE 1, which proves nothing either. The term itself: (1+2n1)n=[(1+2n1)2n]1/2→e1/2=e=0, so the second DIVERGES by the divergence test. The limit of the base decides the first; when it equals 1, the form 1∞ of the term decides the second.
c)
First: (n+2)!n!=(n+1)(n+2)1: the factorials cancel completely and leave a rational term, so the ratio test would give 1. It is telescoping: (n+1)(n+2)1=n+11−n+21, sN=21−N+21→21: CONVERGES, with sum 21. Second: the factor 2n survives the cancellation, an=(n+1)(n+2)2n, and the ratio test applies: anan+1=2⋅n+3n+1→2>1: DIVERGES, the terms tending to infinity. A factorial in the statement is not a factorial in the term: simplify first, then read the form.
d)
First: cos(nπ)=(−1)n, so this is ∑n2/3(−1)n. Absolute series: p=32≤1, diverges. Alternating series test with bn=n2/31: positive, decreasing, limit 0. CONDITIONALLY convergent. Second: cosn is NOT (−1)n; its signs follow no alternating pattern (cos1>0, cos2<0, cos3<0, cos4<0, cos5>0), so the alternating series test does not apply at all. Absolute values: 2ncosn≤2n1, a convergent geometric series, so the series converges ABSOLUTELY by comparison. The ratio test is also out: 2∣cosn∣∣cos(n+1)∣ has no limit, cosn coming close to 0 again and again.
e)
First: the logarithm grows more slowly than any power, and precisely lnx<x for x>0 (the function xlnx has its maximum e2<1 at x=e2). Squaring, (lnn)2<n, so (lnn)21>n1 for n≥2, and ∑n1 diverges: by direct comparison the first series DIVERGES, in the direction that concludes (LARGER than a divergent series). Second: an n-th power, root test: nan=lnn1→0<1: CONVERGES. Same logarithm, but an exponent that grows with n turns a series slower than the harmonic series into one faster than any geometric series.
Exercise 8: Five statements to correct
Each statement below was written on a MATH 141 practice paper, and each one is false or unjustified. Say what is wrong, give the correct statement, and settle it with a short computation or a counterexample.
a) The ratio test gives L=1 for ∑n21, so the series diverges.
b) For ∑n=1∞n!1 the ratio test gives L=0, so the series behaves like a geometric series of ratio 0 and its sum is 1−01=1.
c) For ∑n=1∞n4n(−5)n the ratio test gives L=45>1, so the series is not absolutely convergent; since it alternates, the alternating series test will tell whether it converges conditionally.
d) For ∑n=1∞(2n)!4n(n!)2: (2n)!(2n+2)!=2n+2, so anan+1=2n+24(n+1)2=2(n+1)→∞ and the series diverges.
e) ∑n=1∞(−1)n+13nn+1 converges by the alternating series test, so it is conditionally convergent.
Show the solution
Answers
a)False: L=1 is inconclusive; ∑n21 converges (p=2).
b)False: L is not a ratio of a geometric series; s2=23 already exceeds 1.
c)False: L>1 means the terms do not tend to 0; the series diverges.
d)Right verdict, wrong computation: L=1; the terms increase from a1=2, so it diverges by the divergence test.
e)False: the ratio test gives L=31, so it is ABSOLUTELY convergent.
a)
FALSE. L=1 gives no information, in either direction: anan+1=(n+1n)2→1 for ∑n21, which converges (p-series with p=2>1), and n+1n→1 for ∑n1, which diverges. Correct statement: the ratio test is inconclusive for ∑n21; the p-series test shows that it converges. When L=1, the verdict line must name ANOTHER test.
b)
FALSE. The ratio test only compares the tail with SOME geometric series in order to prove convergence; the number L is not the ratio of the series, and the test never gives the value of a sum. Here the terms are positive and s2=1+21=23>1, so the sum is certainly not 1; it lies between 23 and 2, since n!1≤2n−11 for n≥1 and ∑n≥12n−11=2. Correct statement: L=0<1, so the series converges, and nothing more; its exact value is a question for Taylor series.
c)
FALSE. By Exercise 4 d), L>1 forces ∣an+1∣>∣an∣ from some rank on, so an→0 and the series DIVERGES, the signed series included. Here ∣an∣=n(5/4)n, which tends to infinity (exponential over linear). There is no conditional convergence to look for, and the alternating series test would fail its own hypothesis bn→0. Correct statement: L=45>1, so ∑n4n(−5)n diverges.
d)
Right verdict, wrong reasoning. From (2n)! to (2n+2)! two factors are added: (2n)!(2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1). So anan+1=(2n+2)(2n+1)4(n+1)2=2n+12(n+1)→1: the ratio test is INCONCLUSIVE. But the exact ratio says more: 2n+12n+2>1 for every n, so the terms increase, and an≥a1=24⋅1=2. The terms do not tend to 0 and the series diverges by the divergence test. Correct statement: L=1, inconclusive; the terms increase from a1=2, so the series diverges. The factorial slip turned an inconclusive test into a false certainty, and the conclusion scores nothing without the correct computation.
e)
FALSE conclusion. The alternating series test does prove convergence (bn=3nn+1 decreases to 0), but convergence by the AST does not mean conditional convergence: conditional means convergent AND not absolutely convergent. Check the absolute series first: ∣an∣∣an+1∣=3(n+1)n+2→31<1, so ∑∣an∣ converges. Correct statement: the series is ABSOLUTELY convergent, by the ratio test. On a strategy question, test ∣an∣ first: when it converges, the AST is not needed at all.
Exercise 9: Retransmissions on a noisy channel: an expected value as a series
A device sends a data packet over a noisy radio link. Each attempt succeeds with probability 21, independently of the others, and the device retries until the packet gets through. The first success happens at attempt n with probability (21)n−1⋅21=2n1, so the expected number of attempts is E=∑n=1∞2nn. The figure shows the first terms an=2nn.
The engineer needs three things: that E is a finite number, its value, and how many terms of the series must be added to know it to within 1001.
a) Show that the series defining E converges.
b) Let S=∑n=1∞2nn. Write S−21S as a single series and deduce S. Why was a) necessary? Apply the same manipulation to T=∑n=0∞2n to see what happens without it.
c) Show that anan+1≤127 for all n≥6, and deduce that the remainder R5=∑n=6∞an satisfies R5≤409.
d) Compute s5 and the exact value of R5, and compare with the bound of c).
e) Generalise c): show that RN≤N2N(N+1)2, and find the smallest N for which this bound guarantees RN<1001.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Ratio test: L=21<1, converges.
b)S−21S=∑n≥12n1=1, so S=2; the algebra is valid only on convergent series (T would give T=−1).
c)2nn+1≤127 for n≥6; R5≤1−7/12a6=323⋅512=409.
Positive terms. anan+1=2n+1n+1⋅n2n=2nn+1→21. L=21<1: the series converges by the ratio test, so the expected number of attempts is a finite number. The factor n contributes a 1 to the limit, the 2n the whole 21: a linear weight never defeats a geometric decay.
b)
Since S converges, so does 21S=∑n=1∞2n+1n=∑n=2∞2nn−1 (shift of index), and the difference of two convergent series can be taken term by term: S−21S=21+∑n=2∞2nn−(n−1)=∑n=1∞2n1=1. So 21S=1 and S=E=2: on average two attempts. Every step (multiplying by 21, shifting, subtracting) is legitimate only for CONVERGENT series, and a) is what makes it so. Without it: T=1+2+4+… satisfies, by the same algebra, T=1+2T, so T=−1, an absurd value for a sum of positive numbers. The manipulation computes a value that the series must have IF it has one; the ratio test provides the if.
c)
The ratio 2nn+1=21+2n1 decreases with n, so for n≥6 it is at most its value at n=6: 127. Hence a7≤127a6, a8≤(127)2a6, and in general a6+k≤(127)ka6. Summing a geometric series: R5=a6+a7+⋯≤a6(1+127+(127)2+…)=1−7/12a6=512a6. With a6=646=323: R5≤512⋅323=16036=409. This is the quantitative content of the ratio test: once the ratio is below a fixed r<1, the tail is dominated by a geometric series of ratio r. The bound must use the LARGEST ratio on the tail, here the first one; using the limit 21 instead would give 2a6=163, smaller than the true remainder: on the figure that geometric sequence passes UNDER the terms from n=7 on.
d)
s5=21+42+83+164+325=3216+16+12+8+5=3257. Since S=2=3264, R5=3264−57=327. Compare with 409: 327=16035 and 409=16036, so the bound holds and is sharp, only 1601 above the truth. It is also true in general that RN=2NN+2, which one can check on N=5: 327.
e)
For n≥N+1 the ratio is at most its value at n=N+1: r=2(N+1)N+2, and 1−r=2(N+1)2N+2−N−2=2(N+1)N. As in c), RN≤1−raN+1=2N+1N+1⋅N2(N+1)=N2N(N+1)2; for N=5 it gives back 16036=409. Now N=10: 10⋅1024121=10240121, above 1001 because 12100>10240. N=11: 11⋅2048144=14089, below 1001 because 900<1408. So N=11 terms guarantee ∣S−sN∣<1001. The exact remainders 102412 and 204813 lead to the same N=11: the geometric bound costs nothing here.
Exercise 10: A final exam problem: where the ratio test reaches its limit
This is the kind of question that closes a MATH 141 final: a family of series in which the ratio test settles most members at once and falls silent on exactly one, which must then be settled by hand. Consider an=nncnn! for a fixed constant c>0, and then the series ∑(kn)!(n!)2 for a positive integer k.
a) Show that anan+1=(1+n1)nc, and decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞nn2nn!.
b) Decide the convergence of ∑n=1∞nn3nn!.
c) Now c=e: ∑n=1∞nnenn!. Show that the ratio test is inconclusive. Prove that ln(1+x)<x for x>0, deduce that (1+n1)n<e for every n≥1, and conclude.
d) Decide the convergence of ∑(kn)!(n!)2 for k=1 and for k=3.
e) For which positive integers k does ∑(kn)!(n!)2 converge? Give the value of L for each k.
Show the solution
Answers
a)L=e2<1: converges.
b)L=e3>1: diverges.
c)L=1; the ratio (1+1/n)ne>1, so an≥a1=e: diverges by the divergence test.
d)k=1: diverges (an=n!→∞); k=3: L=0, converges.
e)Converges exactly for k≥2: L=∞ for k=1, 41 for k=2, 0 for k≥3.
a)
anan+1=(n+1)n+1cn+1(n+1)!⋅cnn!nn=c⋅(n+1)n+1(n+1)nn=c(n+1n)n=(1+n1)nc, all terms positive. Since (1+n1)n→e, L=ec. For c=2: L=e2, and e≈2.72>2, so L<1: CONVERGES. Exercise 1 d) was the case c=1.
b)
c=3: L=e3>1 since e<3: DIVERGES, and by Exercise 4 d) the terms themselves grow without bound. So the verdict switches somewhere between c=2 and c=3, and the ratio test locates the switch exactly: at c=e, where L=1 and the test says nothing.
c)
c=e: L=ee=1, inconclusive. Let g(x)=x−ln(1+x) for x≥0: g(0)=0 and g′(x)=1−1+x1=1+xx>0 for x>0, so g is increasing and g(x)>0 for x>0, that is ln(1+x)<x. With x=n1: nln(1+n1)<1, so (1+n1)n<e for every n≥1 (the sequence increases TO e from below). Therefore anan+1=(1+1/n)ne>1 for every n: the terms increase, and an≥a1=1e⋅1=e. The terms do not tend to 0: the series DIVERGES by the divergence test. This is the standard way out of L=1 when the ratio is known exactly: its limit is 1, but its SIDE of 1 tells whether the terms rise or fall. A ratio above 1 for all n proves divergence; a ratio below 1 for all n proves nothing (Exercise 3 b).
d)
k=1: n!(n!)2=n!→∞, so the series diverges by the divergence test (the ratio test also gives anan+1=n+1→∞). k=3: going from (3n)! to (3n+3)! adds THREE factors, (3n+3)(3n+2)(3n+1). So anan+1=(3n+3)(3n+2)(3n+1)(n+1)2=3(3n+2)(3n+1)n+1, a degree 1 numerator over a degree 2 denominator: L=0<1, CONVERGES.
e)
In general (kn+k)!=(kn+k)(kn+k−1)⋯(kn+1)⋅(kn)!, k new factors, each of order kn, while the numerator gains only (n+1)2. So anan+1=(kn+1)(kn+2)⋯(kn+k)(n+1)2: numerator of degree 2, denominator of degree k. For k=1 the limit is ∞ (diverges); for k=2 the degrees are equal and the limit is the ratio of the leading coefficients, 2⋅21=41 (this is Exercise 1 c), converges); for k≥3 the denominator wins and L=0 (converges). Answer: the series converges exactly for k≥2. Counting the new factors of a factorial is the whole exercise; the degree comparison then reads L at a glance.
Something missing from this set?A type of exercise your teacher gives, a problem you are stuck on, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.
Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space.
Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.