Exercise 1: The ratio test: simplify the quotient before taking the limit
The ratio test. Let be a series with nonzero terms and suppose exists (a finite number or ). If , the series converges absolutely; if or , it diverges; if , the test gives no information. The idea: when , the terms eventually shrink at least as fast as those of a geometric series of ratio with .
The whole difficulty is algebraic. is a quotient of two quotients, and the factorials and powers must be cancelled BEFORE the limit is taken: , , . The figure shows the first fifteen ratios for .
- a) Apply the ratio test to .
- b) Same question for . The terms increase up to : does that matter?
- c) Same question for .
- d) Same question for .
- e) On the figure, the first two ratios are above , so . Explain why this does not contradict a), and what the test actually reads.
Show the solution
Answers
- a) : converges (absolutely).
- b) : converges; the first 99 terms are irrelevant.
- c) : converges.
- d) : converges.
- e) Only the LIMIT of the ratios counts; finitely many ratios above change finitely many terms, never the verdict.
a) Terms positive, so no absolute values are needed. . As , , so . Since , the series converges by the ratio test. The gesture that earns the mark is the rewriting and BEFORE the limit: the powers of contribute a factor that tends to , the exponential contributes the whole of . That is the general pattern: a polynomial factor never changes the value of .
b) , using . So : the series converges. The ratio is exactly when , so the terms increase up to and only then decrease, and the terms around are astronomically large. None of this matters: convergence is a property of the TAIL of the series, and removing or changing finitely many terms changes the sum but never whether it exists. The factorial grows faster than any geometric sequence, however large its base, and the ratio test shows it in one line.
c) , because (squared) and . Simplify: (divide top and bottom by : ). : converges. The classic slip is : going from to adds TWO factors, and forgetting gives a limit of and the opposite verdict.
d) . The limit is the one of the sequences chapter, so , about : converges. The trap here is the form : , and writing would give and a false no information. The exponent grows with , so the base tending to decides nothing; the limit is .
e) The terms are , , , then and they decrease: the ratios and are above , the third, , is below. There is no contradiction: the ratio test reads the LIMIT of the ratios, which is , and the proof only uses the ratios from some rank on. On the figure, from on every ratio is below and they settle on the dashed line at . A student who stops at and concludes divergence has read one ratio instead of a limit, which the test never allows.