Corrected exercises: infinite limits, limits at infinity and asymptotes (MATH 140)
This is the corrected exercise set for infinite limits, limits at infinity and asymptotes in MATH 140, Calculus 1, at McGill University: the infinite limits of section 2.2 of Stewart and all of section 2.6.It comes before the derivative, so every limit here is settled by algebra, never by L'Hospital's rule, and every number is exact and chosen to be done by hand.
What the set covers, the traps it targets
It comes before the derivative, so every limit here is settled by algebra, never by L'Hospital's rule, and every number is exact and chosen to be done by hand.
Each solution names the step it takes, because a limit given without its sign study or its division earns almost nothing.
The thread running through the whole set: infinity is not a number you substitute. Near a vertical asymptote, “nonzero over zero” becomes an answer only once the sign of the denominator is written on EACH side; at infinity, the dominant term decides, and its sign depends on the direction, since x2=∣x∣ and the dominant exponential is not the same at both ends. A form ∞−∞ or ∞∞ is a comparison to carry out, never a value.
The traps named in the solutions: writing 06=∞ without a side, declaring an asymptote where the factor cancels, forgetting the minus sign of x2 as x→−∞, answering 0 to ∞−∞ and 1 to ∞∞, approximating inside a difference, dividing by ex at −∞, believing a graph never crosses its horizontal asymptote or has only one, taking a sign change for an asymptote, and reading a limit at infinity as a value that is eventually reached.
•limx→a±D(x)N(x) with N→L=0 and D→0: infinite, with the sign of DL on each side. x=a is a vertical asymptote if ONE one-sided limit is infinite.
•If N(a)=D(a)=0: factor first; a cancelled factor leaves a hole, not an asymptote.
•Rational function at ±∞: divide by the highest power of the denominator. Degree of N below: 0; equal: ratio of leading coefficients; one more: oblique asymptote by long division.
•x2=∣x∣: for x<0, x2+…=−x1+…. A difference A−B of form ∞−∞: multiply by the conjugate.
•ex→0 at −∞, lnx→−∞ at 0+, arctanx→±2π at ±∞. Up to two horizontal asymptotes, one per direction.
•y=mx+b is an asymptote when f(x)−(mx+b)→0; the sign of that gap gives the side of the curve.
Part A: the basics (/50)
Exercise 1: Infinite limits: the sign on each side decides
17 answers to check
We write limx→a+f(x)=∞ when f(x) becomes as large as we like for all x close enough to a on the right, and similarly with −∞ and with a−. The line x=a is a vertical asymptote of the graph as soon as ONE of the four one-sided limits limx→a±f(x) is ∞ or −∞.
A quotient whose numerator tends to a nonzero number L and whose denominator tends to 0 is NOT yet an answer: its size goes to infinity, but its sign is decided by the sign of the denominator on each side of a, and that sign must be written. The figure shows f(x)=(x+2)(x−1)2x+3.
a) Read on the figure limx→−2−f(x), limx→−2+f(x), limx→1f(x) and limx→±∞f(x). Then confirm the three limits at −2 and at 1 from the formula, by a study of signs.
b) Find limx→3−x−32x and limx→3+x−32x. What can you say about limx→3x−32x?
c) Find limx→−1(x+1)2x−5.
d) Let h(x)=x2−x−2x2−4. The denominator vanishes at x=2 and at x=−1. For each of these two values, decide whether the graph of h has a vertical asymptote there, and give the one-sided limits.
e) Find limx→2+ln(x−2), limx→(π/2)−tanx, limx→(π/2)+tanx, limx→0−e1/x and limx→0+e1/x. Which vertical asymptotes do these limits give?
Show the solution
Answers
a)−∞, +∞, +∞ (both sides of 1), and 0 at both ends; vertical asymptotes x=−2 and x=1.
b)−∞ and +∞; limx→3x−32x does not exist, not even as an infinite limit.
c)−∞
d)x=2: no asymptote, limx→2h(x)=34 (a hole); x=−1: asymptote, −∞ on the left and +∞ on the right.
e)−∞; +∞ and −∞; 0 and +∞. Asymptotes x=2 (for ln(x−2)), x=2π (for tan), x=0 (for e1/x, from the right only).
a)
On the figure, the curve plunges down along x=−2 on the left and shoots up on the right; along x=1 it climbs on BOTH sides; and it flattens onto the x-axis at both ends. So limx→−2−f(x)=−∞, limx→−2+f(x)=+∞, limx→1f(x)=+∞ and limx→±∞f(x)=0. From the formula, near x=−2: the numerator x+3→1>0 and (x−1)2→9>0, so the sign is the sign of x+2, which tends to 0 through negative values on the left (0−) and through positive values on the right (0+). Hence 9⋅0−1 gives −∞ and 9⋅0+1 gives +∞. Near x=1: x+3→4, x+2→3, and (x−1)2→0+ from BOTH sides, because a square is never negative: the limit is +∞ on each side, so limx→1f(x)=+∞. The two lines x=−2 and x=1 are vertical asymptotes. The factor to watch is the one that tends to 0, and the power on it decides: odd power, the sign flips across the asymptote; even power, it does not.
b)
As x→3, the numerator 2x→6>0. For x<3, x−3<0, so the quotient is (positive)/(small negative): limx→3−x−32x=−∞. For x>3, x−3>0: limx→3+x−32x=+∞. The two one-sided limits are different, so limx→3x−32x does not exist, and we may not even write =∞: that notation is reserved for a function that goes to +∞ on both sides. Writing 06=∞ and stopping there is the most common way to lose this mark: the sign study IS the answer.
c)
The numerator tends to −1−5=−6<0. The denominator (x+1)2 tends to 0 and is positive on both sides of −1, so it tends to 0+. Then (x+1)2x−5 is (about −6)/(small positive) on both sides: limx→−1(x+1)2x−5=−∞. A negative numerator over 0+ gives −∞: the sign of the NUMERATOR matters as much as that of the denominator, and a student who only looks at the square answers +∞.
d)
Factor before deciding: x2−4=(x−2)(x+2) and x2−x−2=(x−2)(x+1). For x=2, h(x)=x+1x+2. At x=2, both numerator and denominator of the original formula vanish: this is a form 00, not a vertical asymptote. After simplification, limx→2h(x)=2+12+2=34: the graph has a HOLE at (2,34). At x=−1, the simplified numerator x+2→1=0 while x+1→0: on the left x+1→0− and h(x)→−∞; on the right x+1→0+ and h(x)→+∞. The line x=−1 is a vertical asymptote. The rule: a zero of the denominator gives a vertical asymptote only when the numerator does NOT tend to 0 there; when both tend to 0, factor first.
e)
As x→2+, x−2→0+ and lnu→−∞ as u→0+, so limx→2+ln(x−2)=−∞ (and the limit from the left makes no sense, ln(x−2) is not defined there). Next, tanx=cosxsinx with sinx→1 as x→2π; cosx>0 just left of 2π and <0 just right, so tanx→+∞ on the left and −∞ on the right. Finally, as x→0−, x1→−∞, and eu→0 as u→−∞, so e1/x→0; as x→0+, x1→+∞ and e1/x→+∞. The vertical asymptotes are x=2, x=2π (and every 2π+kπ), and x=0 for e1/x, although that last one is infinite from ONE side only. One infinite one-sided limit is enough for an asymptote.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.
Exercise 2: Rational functions at infinity: divide by the dominant power
11 answers to check
We write limx→∞f(x)=L when f(x) is as close to L as we like for all x large enough; the line y=L is then a horizontal asymptote. The basic facts: for r>0, xr1→0 as x→∞, and also as x→−∞ when xr is defined.
For a rational function, divide the numerator and the denominator by the highest power of x in the DENOMINATOR, then let every xkc go to 0. The figure shows f(x)=2x2+73x2−5x+1 and the line y=23.
a) Find limx→∞f(x) and limx→−∞f(x). The figure shows the curve crossing the line y=23: find exactly where, and say whether this contradicts the asymptote.
b) Find limx→∞x3+24x−1 and limx→−∞1−2x35x3−x.
c) Find limx→∞5−x22x3−x and limx→−∞5−x22x3−x.
d) Find limx→∞x3−4(2x−1)2(x+3) without expanding the whole numerator.
e) Find limx→∞(x3−100x2) and limx→−∞(x3−100x2). One of the two is a form ∞−∞ and the other is not: which?
Show the solution
Answers
a)23 at both ends; the curve crosses y=23 at x=−1019, which is allowed.
b)0 and −25
c)−∞ and +∞: no horizontal asymptote.
d)4
e)+∞ (the form ∞−∞, settled by factoring x3) and −∞ (not indeterminate: −∞−∞).
a)
Divide by x2, the highest power of the denominator: f(x)=2+x273−x5+x21. As x→±∞, every fraction xkc tends to 0, so f(x)→23 at both ends, and y=23 is a horizontal asymptote. The crossing: f(x)=23 means 2(3x2−5x+1)=3(2x2+7), that is 6x2−10x+2=6x2+21, so −10x=19 and x=−1019. No contradiction: an asymptote describes what the graph does as x→±∞, and says nothing about finite x. Here, for x<−1019 the curve is above the line and comes down onto it from above as x→−∞, exactly as the figure shows.
b)
First limit: the highest power of the denominator is x3: 1+x32x24−x31→1+00−0=0. Degree of the numerator below degree of the denominator always gives 0. Second limit: divide by x3: x31−25−x21→−25=−25, and this is the same as x→+∞: when the degrees are equal, the limit is the ratio of the leading coefficients, sign included. Writing 25 because the −2x3 was read as 2x3 costs the mark: keep each coefficient with its sign.
c)
Divide by x2: 5−x22x3−x=x25−12x−x1. The denominator tends to −1 at both ends. As x→+∞, the numerator 2x−x1→+∞, so the quotient tends to −∞. As x→−∞, the numerator tends to −∞, and dividing by a number close to −1 gives +∞. No horizontal asymptote: the numerator's degree is larger. The shortcut, and the check, is to keep the leading terms: −x22x3=−2x, which tends to −∞ at +∞ and to +∞ at −∞. Answering ∞ for both ends is the classic mistake: the sign changes with the direction because the dominant term −2x is ODD.
d)
Only the leading term of each factor matters: (2x−1)2(x+3)=x3(2−x1)2(1+x3) and x3−4=x3(1−x34). Cancel x3: 1−x34(2−x1)2(1+x3)→122⋅1=4. Factoring x out of each bracket is quicker and safer than expanding, and it shows at a glance that the numerator has degree 3 with leading coefficient 22⋅1=4. The trap is to read the leading coefficient of (2x−1)2 as 2 instead of 4.
e)
As x→+∞, x3→+∞ and −100x2→−∞: this is the form ∞−∞, which decides nothing by itself. Factor out the dominant power: x3−100x2=x3(1−x100), a product of a factor tending to +∞ and a factor tending to 1, so the limit is +∞. The first values are misleading: at x=50 the polynomial equals 125000−250000<0, and it only becomes positive for x>100. As x→−∞, x3→−∞ AND −100x2→−∞: two terms going to −∞ add up to −∞, and there is nothing to decide. A form ∞−∞ appears only when the two terms pull in opposite directions.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 3: Square roots at infinity: the square root of x squared is |x|
7 answers to check
For every real number x, x2=∣x∣, which equals x when x>0 and −x when x<0. So when a square root is divided by x, the step xx2+…=x2x2+… is correct as x→+∞ and FALSE as x→−∞, where a minus sign appears.
A difference of two terms that both tend to ∞, one of them a square root, is settled by the conjugate: A−B=A+BA−B2. The figure shows f(x)=4x2+16x−1.
a) Find limx→∞f(x).
b) Find limx→−∞f(x), and give all the horizontal asymptotes of the graph of f.
c) Find limx→∞(x2+6x−x).
d) Find limx→−∞(x2+6x−x) and limx→−∞(x2+6x+x).
e) A student writes: for large x, 4x2+x≈4x2=2x, so limx→∞(4x2+x−2x)=0. Find the correct limit and say where the argument fails.
Show the solution
Answers
a)3
b)−3; two horizontal asymptotes, y=3 (as x→∞) and y=−3 (as x→−∞).
c)3
d)+∞ (not indeterminate) and −3
e)41: the approximation throws away exactly the term that decides a form ∞−∞.
a)
Divide the numerator and the denominator by x. For x>0, x=x2, so x4x2+1=x24x2+1=4+x21. Then f(x)=4+x216−x1→46=3. The limit 4+x21→2 uses the continuity of the square root at 4.
b)
For x<0, x2=∣x∣=−x, so x=−x2 and x4x2+1=−4+x21. Hence f(x)=−4+x216−x1→−26=−3. The graph has TWO horizontal asymptotes, y=3 on the right and y=−3 on the left, which is what the figure shows. Sanity check before any algebra: for x very negative, the numerator 6x−1 is negative and the root is positive, so f(x)<0, and an answer of +3 is impossible. Forgetting the minus sign is the trap of this chapter, and it costs the whole limit.
c)
This is the form ∞−∞. Multiply and divide by the conjugate: x2+6x−x=x2+6x+x(x2+6x)−x2=x2+6x+x6x. Divide by x>0: 1+x6+16→1+16=3. Check with x=100: 10600≈102.96 (since 1032=10609), and 102.96−100≈2.96, close to 3.
d)
As x→−∞, x2+6x→+∞ (the function is defined for x≤−6) and −x→+∞: the sum of two terms going to +∞ goes to +∞. There is no indeterminate form, and the conjugate would only complicate things. For the second limit, x2+6x→+∞ and x→−∞: now it IS a form ∞−∞. Conjugate: x2+6x+x=x2+6x−x(x2+6x)−x2=x2+6x−x6x. Divide by x<0, using xx2+6x=−1+x6: −1+x6−16→−26=−3. Always decide first whether the form is indeterminate, then whether x is positive or negative before bringing it under the root.
e)
4x2+x−2x=4x2+x+2x(4x2+x)−4x2=4x2+x+2xx=4+x1+21→2+21=41. The student's approximation is true as a RATIO, 2x4x2+x→1, but a difference of two huge numbers is decided by what the approximation threw away: here 4x2+x exceeds 2x by about 41, a gap that does not shrink. Replacing a term by an equivalent one is legitimate in a product or a quotient, never in a difference.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 4: Exponentials, logarithms and arctangent at the ends of the axis
14 answers to check
Four facts carry this exercise, all read on the graphs of the functions: ex→∞ as x→∞ and ex→0 as x→−∞ (so e−x does the opposite); lnx→∞ as x→∞ and lnx→−∞ as x→0+; arctanx→2π as x→∞ and arctanx→−2π as x→−∞. For a composition, find the limit of the inside first, then apply the outside function to where the inside goes.
The figure shows g(x)=ex−12ex+3, defined for x=0.
a) Find limx→∞g(x) and limx→−∞g(x).
b) Find limx→0−g(x) and limx→0+g(x). List all the asymptotes of the graph of g.
c) Find limx→∞arctan(x2−x), limx→−∞arctan(x3+x), and the two one-sided limits of arctan(x1) at 0. Is x=0 a vertical asymptote of arctan(x1)?
d) Find limx→∞[ln(2x+1)−ln(x+3)] and limx→(−1/2)+ln(2x+1).
e) Find limx→∞e3x+exe3x−e−x and limx→−∞e3x+exe3x−e−x.
Show the solution
Answers
a)2 and −3
b)−∞ and +∞; asymptotes y=2 (right), y=−3 (left) and x=0.
c)2π, −2π; −2π from the left and 2π from the right; no vertical asymptote (a jump, the function stays bounded).
d)ln2 and −∞
e)1 and −∞
a)
As x→∞, ex dominates: divide by it. g(x)=1−e−x2+3e−x→1−02+0=2. As x→−∞, ex→0 and nothing needs dividing: g(x)→0−10+3=−3. Two different horizontal asymptotes, y=2 on the right and y=−3 on the left, as on the figure. Dividing by ex at −∞ would be dividing by a number that tends to 0: the dominant term is not the same at both ends, and ex only dominates as x→+∞.
b)
As x→0, the numerator tends to 2+3=5>0 and the denominator ex−1 tends to 0. Its sign: ex>1 for x>0 and ex<1 for x<0, so ex−1→0+ on the right and 0− on the left. Hence limx→0−g(x)=−∞ and limx→0+g(x)=+∞. The asymptotes: y=2 as x→∞, y=−3 as x→−∞, and x=0, the y-axis itself. The sign of ex−1 comes from the fact that ex is increasing with e0=1: say it, it is the whole justification.
c)
x2−x=x(x−1)→∞ as x→∞ (product of two factors tending to ∞), and arctanu→2π as u→∞, so the first limit is 2π. x3+x=x(x2+1)→−∞ as x→−∞, so the second is −2π. As x→0−, x1→−∞ and arctan(x1)→−2π; as x→0+, x1→+∞ and arctan(x1)→2π. The one-sided limits are finite and different: a jump of height π, and NOT a vertical asymptote, since arctan(x1)<2π for all x=0. A denominator that tends to 0 inside a bounded function produces no asymptote.
d)
Each logarithm tends to ∞: the form is ∞−∞. Combine by the law of logarithms, valid since 2x+1>0 and x+3>0 for large x: ln(2x+1)−ln(x+3)=ln(x+32x+1). The inside tends to 2 (ratio of the leading coefficients), and ln is continuous at 2, so the limit is ln2. Answering 0 because both logarithms grow alike is the trap. As x→(−21)+, 2x+1→0+ and lnu→−∞ as u→0+: the limit is −∞, and x=−21 is a vertical asymptote of ln(2x+1).
e)
As x→∞, the dominant exponential is e3x: 1+e−2x1−e−4x→1+01−0=1. As x→−∞ the ranking reverses: e−x→∞ while e3x and ex tend to 0, and in the denominator ex is the larger of the two (since e3x=ex⋅e2x with e2x→0). Divide by ex: e2x+1e2x−e−2x. The numerator tends to 0−∞=−∞ and the denominator to 1, so the limit is −∞. The largest exponent wins at +∞, the most negative one wins at −∞: always rank the exponentials again when the direction changes.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 5: Oblique asymptotes: long division, and the sign of what is left
14 answers to check
The line y=mx+b with m=0 is an oblique (slant) asymptote when limx→∞[f(x)−(mx+b)]=0, or the same as x→−∞. For a rational function whose numerator has degree exactly ONE more than the denominator, long division gives f(x)=mx+b+D(x)R(x) with a remainder of lower degree than D, so the fraction tends to 0 at both ends.
The sign of D(x)R(x) says on which side of the asymptote the curve lies. The figure shows f(x)=x−1x2+x+2 and the dashed line y=x+2.
a) Divide x2+x+2 by x−1, and deduce the oblique asymptote of f. Find also its vertical asymptote with the two one-sided limits.
b) Study the sign of f(x)−(x+2). On which side of the asymptote is the curve, for x>1 and for x<1? Compare with the figure.
c) Let g(x)=x2+1x3−1. Find its oblique asymptote, and show that the graph of g crosses it. Where?
d) Without dividing completely, say which of x−1x3+2 and x2−43x2+1 has an oblique asymptote, and describe the end behaviour of each.
e) Let k(x)=x2+4x. Show that y=x+2 is an oblique asymptote as x→∞ and that y=−x−2 is one as x→−∞.
Show the solution
Answers
a)f(x)=x+2+x−14; oblique asymptote y=x+2; vertical asymptote x=1, with −∞ on the left and +∞ on the right.
b)f(x)−(x+2)=x−14: above the line for x>1, below for x<1.
c)g(x)=x−x2+1x+1: asymptote y=x, crossed at x=−1, at the point (−1,−1).
d)x−1x3+2: no oblique asymptote, it behaves like x2 (+∞ at both ends); x2−43x2+1: horizontal asymptote y=3, no oblique one.
e)k(x)−(x+2)=x2+4x+x+2−4→0 at ∞; k(x)−(−x−2)=x2+4x−x−2−4→0 at −∞.
a)
Long division: x2÷x=x, and x2+x+2−x(x−1)=2x+2; then 2x÷x=2, and 2x+2−2(x−1)=4. So x2+x+2=(x−1)(x+2)+4 and f(x)=x+2+x−14. Check at x=3: f(3)=214=7 and 3+2+24=7. As x→±∞, x−14→0, so f(x)−(x+2)→0 and y=x+2 is an oblique asymptote at both ends. At x=1 the numerator is 4=0: with x−1→0− on the left, f(x)→−∞; with 0+ on the right, f(x)→+∞. The vertical asymptote is x=1. The quotient of the division is the asymptote; the remainder is only what tends to 0.
b)
f(x)−(x+2)=x−14, positive for x>1 and negative for x<1. So the curve lies ABOVE its asymptote on the right branch and BELOW on the left branch, and it approaches the line from above as x→∞ and from below as x→−∞. The figure agrees: the right branch comes down onto the dashed line from above, the left branch climbs to it from underneath. This sign study is the part examiners reward, because it is what makes a sketch correct near the asymptote.
c)
Divide x3−1 by x2+1: x3÷x2=x, and x3−1−x(x2+1)=−x−1. So g(x)=x−x2+1x+1, and since x2+1x+1→0 at both ends (degree 1 over degree 2), the line y=x is an oblique asymptote. The gap g(x)−x=−x2+1x+1 vanishes when x=−1: g(−1)=2−2=−1, a point of the line y=x. The curve crosses its asymptote at (−1,−1): below the line for x>−1, above it for x<−1. Like a horizontal asymptote, an oblique one only describes the ends of the graph.
d)
x−1x3+2: the degree difference is 2, so the quotient of the division has degree 2: x3+2=(x−1)(x2+x+1)+3, and the function behaves like the parabola x2+x+1, tending to +∞ at both ends. No line approaches it, so no oblique asymptote. x2−43x2+1: equal degrees, so it tends to 13=3 at both ends, a horizontal asymptote y=3, and a function cannot have both a horizontal and an oblique asymptote in the same direction. The rule to remember: oblique asymptote for a rational function exactly when the degree of the numerator is ONE more than that of the denominator.
e)
k is defined for x2+4x≥0, that is x≤−4 or x≥0. As x→∞: k(x)−(x+2)=x2+4x+x+2(x2+4x)−(x+2)2=x2+4x+x+2−4, whose denominator tends to ∞, so the gap tends to 0: y=x+2 is an oblique asymptote. As x→−∞: k(x)−(−x−2)=x2+4x+(x+2)=x2+4x−(x+2)(x2+4x)−(x+2)2=x2+4x−x−2−4; now x2+4x→∞ AND −x−2→∞, so the denominator tends to ∞ and the gap to 0. The slope is +1 on the right and −1 on the left, because x2=∣x∣: the graph of k opens like a V, not like a line.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Part B: problems and reasoning (/50)
Exercise 6: Asymptotes as constraints: finding the parameters
10 answers to check
An exam favourite turns the chapter around: the asymptotes are given, the formula has unknown constants, and each asymptote becomes an equation. The trap is always the same: a zero of the denominator gives a vertical asymptote only if the numerator does NOT vanish there too, so every candidate must be checked in the numerator before it is accepted.
No figure here: every answer must come from the formula, as on the final.
a) Find the constants a and b so that the graph of f(x)=bx−6ax+5 has the vertical asymptote x=3 and the horizontal asymptote y=2. Check that x=3 really is an asymptote.
b) Let g(x)=x−1x2+px+q. Find p so that y=x+4 is an oblique asymptote. For which value of q does the graph of g have NO vertical asymptote, and what does it look like then?
c) Find the constant k such that limx→∞(x2+kx−x)=5.
d) Find a and b so that h(x)=x2+bx+4ax2+3 has exactly one vertical asymptote, the line x=2, and the horizontal asymptote y=−1. Then give the behaviour of h on each side of x=2.
Show the solution
Answers
a)b=2, a=4: f(x)=2x−64x+5, numerator 17=0 at x=3.
b)p=3; no vertical asymptote exactly when q=−4: then g(x)=x+4 for x=1, a line with a hole at (1,5).
c)k=10
d)a=−1, b=−4: h(x)=(x−2)23−x2, which tends to −∞ on both sides of 2.
a)
As x→±∞, f(x)→ba (divide by x), provided b=0; so ba=2. A vertical asymptote at x=3 needs the denominator to vanish there: 3b−6=0, so b=2, then a=4. The check the question asks for: at x=3 the numerator is 4⋅3+5=17=0, so f(x)=2x−64x+5 is (about 17)/(something tending to 0) and tends to ±∞: limx→3−f(x)=−∞ and limx→3+f(x)=+∞. Without that check, the answer is incomplete: had the numerator vanished at 3, the graph would have had a hole instead.
b)
Divide: x2+px+q=(x−1)(x+p+1)+(1+p+q), which can be checked by expanding: (x−1)(x+p+1)=x2+px−p−1. So g(x)=x+p+1+x−11+p+q, and the oblique asymptote is y=x+p+1. It equals y=x+4 exactly when p=3. Then g(x)=x+4+x−14+q. If q=−4, the numerator 1+3+q=4+q does not vanish at x=1, and x=1 is a vertical asymptote. If q=−4, the remainder is 0: x2+3x−4=(x−1)(x+4), so g(x)=x+4 for every x=1. The graph is the line y=x+4 with a hole at (1,5), and there is no vertical asymptote. The value of q that kills the asymptote is the one that makes the numerator vanish at 1: 1+3+q=0.
c)
Conjugate, as in Exercise 3: x2+kx−x=x2+kx+xkx=1+xk+1k for x>0, which tends to 2k. So the limit equals 5 exactly when k=10. Check: with k=10 and x=1000, 1010000≈1004.99, since 10052=1010025; the difference is about 4.99. The graph of x2+10x therefore has the oblique asymptote y=x+5 as x→∞: a limit with a parameter is often an asymptote in disguise.
d)
Horizontal asymptote: the degrees are equal, so h(x)→1a=a at both ends, and a=−1. Vertical asymptote: the denominator must vanish at 2, so 4+2b+4=0 and b=−4; then x2−4x+4=(x−2)2, whose only zero is 2. There is no other choice of b: a quadratic x2+bx+4 with the root 2 has the product of its roots equal to 4, so its other root is 2 as well. Check the numerator at 2: −4+3=−1=0, so x=2 really is a vertical asymptote, and it is the only one. On both sides, (x−2)2→0+ and the numerator tends to −1: h(x)→−∞ on the left AND on the right. The double root is what makes both branches go down.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 7: From a sign chart to the behaviour at every asymptote
12 answers to check
Let f(x)=(x−1)2(x+2)(x+1)(x−3). The figure is its sign chart: one row per factor, the sign of f on the last row, a 0 where a factor vanishes and a double bar where f is not defined.
The sign chart is the tool of this exercise: the size of f near an asymptote comes from the factor that tends to 0, and its SIGN comes from the chart. No derivative is needed, and none is allowed: the question is only how the graph behaves at its asymptotes and where it meets the axes.
a) Explain why the row of (x−1)2 has no minus sign, why the last row has a double bar at −2 and at 1, and check the sign of f on the interval (1,3) from the factor rows.
b) Give the four one-sided limits of f at −2 and at 1.
c) Find limx→∞f(x) and limx→−∞f(x), and say from which side the graph approaches its horizontal asymptote at each end.
d) Find the intercepts with the axes, then sketch the graph near its three asymptotes, using only these intercepts and the results of b) and c).
e) A student writes: “f has a vertical asymptote at x=1 because f changes sign there, and none at x=3 because it only changes sign.” Correct the reasoning.
Show the solution
Answers
a)A square is never negative; at −2 and 1 the denominator vanishes; on (1,3): (+)(+)(+)(−)<0.
b)limx→−2−f=−∞, limx→−2+f=+∞, limx→1±f=−∞.
c)0 at both ends: from above (f>0) as x→∞, from below (f<0) as x→−∞.
d)x-intercepts −1 and 3, y-intercept −23; sketch in the solution figure.
e)f does NOT change sign at 1 and is −∞ on both sides; the asymptote comes from the denominator tending to 0, not from a sign change. At 3 the sign changes because f(3)=0.
a)
(x−1)2 is a square, so it is positive for x=1 and zero at 1: its row reads + everywhere, with a 0 at 1. The last row carries a double bar where f is not defined, that is where the DENOMINATOR (x−1)2(x+2) vanishes: x=−2 and x=1. The zeros of f are those of the numerator, −1 and 3. On (1,3): x+2>0, x+1>0, x−3<0 and (x−1)2>0, so f(x)=(+)(+)(+)(−)<0, as the chart says. Reading a chart is one step; being able to rebuild any cell from the factors is what the examiner checks.
b)
At x=−2 the numerator tends to (−1)(−5)=5=0 and the denominator to 0, so ∣f(x)∣→∞; the chart gives the sign: f<0 just left of −2 and f>0 just right. Hence limx→−2−f(x)=−∞ and limx→−2+f(x)=+∞. At x=1 the numerator tends to (2)(−2)=−4=0 and the denominator to 0, and f<0 on both sides: limx→1−f(x)=limx→1+f(x)=−∞, so limx→1f(x)=−∞. The two lines x=−2 and x=1 are vertical asymptotes. The chart replaces four separate studies of 0+ and 0− with one table, and the square factor explains why 1 behaves differently from −2.
c)
The numerator has degree 2 and the denominator degree 3: dividing by x3, f(x)=(1−x1)2(1+x2)(x1+x21)(1−x3)→1⋅10⋅1=0 at both ends, so y=0 is the horizontal asymptote. From which side: the last column of the chart says f>0 for x>3, so the graph comes down onto the axis from above as x→∞; the first column says f<0 for x<−2, so it rises to the axis from below as x→−∞. The leading terms confirm it: f(x) behaves like x3x2=x1, positive on the right and negative on the left.
d)
The x-intercepts are the zeros of the numerator that are in the domain, x=−1 and x=3; the y-intercept is f(0)=(1)(2)(1)(−3)=−23. The sketch: on (−∞,−2), the curve leaves the x-axis from below and plunges to −∞ along x=−2; on (−2,1) it comes down from +∞, crosses the axis at −1, passes through (0,−23) and falls to −∞ along x=1; on (1,∞) it rises from −∞, crosses the axis at 3 and settles on the axis from above. The solution figure shows exactly these pieces, and nothing more is asked: where the curve turns belongs to the chapter on curve sketching.
e)
Both halves of the claim are wrong. At x=1, f does NOT change sign: it is negative on both sides, and it still has a vertical asymptote, because the denominator tends to 0 while the numerator tends to −4=0. At x=3, f changes sign because the numerator vanishes, f(3)=0: a sign change through a zero of f is an intercept, not an asymptote. A sign change can happen at a zero or at an asymptote, and an asymptote can happen with or without a sign change: the only question to ask is whether the denominator tends to 0 while the numerator does not.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 8: Five statements to correct
5 answers to check
Each statement below was written by a student on a MATH 140 assignment, and each is false. Say what is wrong, give a counterexample, and write the correct statement.
a) If the denominator of a rational function f is zero at x=a, then x=a is a vertical asymptote of the graph of f.
b) The graph of a function can never cross its horizontal asymptote.
c) A function has at most one horizontal asymptote.
d) ∞−∞=0 and ∞∞=1.
e) limx→0x31=∞, so this limit exists.
Show the solution
Answers
a)False: x−2x2−4→4 at 2 (a hole). True if the numerator does not tend to 0 at a.
b)False: xsinx→0 and equals 0 at every x=kπ.
c)False: arctanx has y=2π and y=−2π. At most TWO, one per direction.
d)False: (x+1)−x→1, x2−x→∞; x2x→2. These are indeterminate forms.
e)False twice: −∞ from the left, +∞ from the right; and an infinite limit is a limit that does not exist.
a)
FALSE. f(x)=x−2x2−4 has a denominator that vanishes at 2, but f(x)=x+2 for x=2, so limx→2f(x)=4: the graph is a line with a hole at (2,4), and nothing goes to infinity. Correct statement: if the denominator tends to 0 at a while the numerator tends to a NONZERO number, then x=a is a vertical asymptote. When both tend to 0, the form is 00: factor and simplify before deciding.
b)
FALSE. For x>0, xsinx≤x1, which tends to 0, so xsinx→0 as x→∞ and y=0 is a horizontal asymptote; yet xsinx=0 at x=π,2π,3π,…, so the graph crosses its asymptote infinitely often. A rational example: 2x2+73x2−5x+1 crosses y=23 at x=−1019 (Exercise 2). Correct statement: a horizontal asymptote describes the graph as x→∞ or x→−∞ only; it can be crossed any number of times at finite x.
c)
FALSE. arctanx→2π as x→∞ and arctanx→−2π as x→−∞: two horizontal asymptotes. So does 4x2+16x−1, with y=3 and y=−3 (Exercise 3), and ex−12ex+3, with y=2 and y=−3 (Exercise 4). Correct statement: a function has at most TWO horizontal asymptotes, one as x→∞ and one as x→−∞, and the two limits must be computed separately. For a rational function they coincide, which is where the false belief comes from.
d)
FALSE. ∞ is not a number, and these are forms, not values. (x+1)−x=1→1, while x2−x→∞ and x−x2→−∞: three limits of the form ∞−∞, three different answers. Likewise x2x→2, xx2→∞ and x2x→0 are all of the form ∞∞. Correct statement: ∞−∞ and ∞∞ are indeterminate forms; transform the expression (factor the dominant term, divide by it, or use a conjugate) before taking the limit.
e)
FALSE, twice. First, x3 has the sign of x: limx→0−x31=−∞ and limx→0+x31=+∞, so limx→0x31 is not even infinite; only x21 or x41 would go to +∞ on both sides. Second, writing limx→0x21=∞ does not mean the limit exists: it is a precise way of saying HOW it fails to exist, the values growing without bound. Correct statement: limx→0+x31=∞ and limx→0−x31=−∞; the two-sided limit does not exist, and x=0 is a vertical asymptote.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 9: The brine tank: a concentration that never reaches its limit
8 answers to check
A storage tank holds 600 L of pure water. Brine containing 40 g of salt per litre is pumped in at 20 L/min; the mixture is stirred, so its concentration is the same everywhere, and nothing flows out. The tank can hold 10000 L.
The questions ask what happens to the concentration of salt in the tank in the long run, and how long “the long run” really is. No calculator: every answer is exact. The figure below shows the situation.
a) Show that after t minutes the concentration of salt in the tank is C(t)=30+t40t grams per litre.
b) Find limt→∞C(t) and interpret it. Show that C(t)<40 for every t≥0.
c) When does the concentration reach 30 g/L? 36 g/L? Compare the two waiting times.
d) When does the tank become full, and what is the concentration then? What does the limit of b) tell you about this tank, and what does it not?
e) The same pump now fills a tank that starts with 600 L of brine at 10 g/L, or at 50 g/L. Find the concentration in each case and its limit, and say from which side each approaches it.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Salt 800t g, volume 600+20t L, so C(t)=600+20t800t=30+t40t g/L.
b)limt→∞C(t)=40 g/L, the concentration of the incoming brine; 40−C(t)=30+t1200>0.
c)t=90 min for 30 g/L, t=270 min for 36 g/L: the next 6 g/L take twice as long as the first 30.
d)Full at t=470 min, with C(470)=37.6 g/L; the limit 40 is a bound and a trend, never a value reached.
e)30+t300+40t→40 from below; 30+t1500+40t→40 from above.
a)
Every minute the pump brings 20 L of brine, each litre carrying 40 g of salt, so 800 g of salt per minute; the tank starts with no salt, so after t minutes it contains 800t grams. Nothing flows out, so the volume is 600+20t litres. The concentration is the amount of salt divided by the volume: C(t)=600+20t800t, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 20 gives C(t)=30+t40t g/L. Check at t=0: C(0)=0, pure water.
b)
Divide by t: C(t)=t30+140→0+140=40 as t→∞. The line C=40 is a horizontal asymptote of the graph of C, and 40 g/L is precisely the concentration of the brine being pumped in: after a very long time, the tank holds almost nothing but incoming brine, and the 600 L of water it started with are diluted into insignificance. Never reached: 40−C(t)=30+t40(30+t)−40t=30+t1200>0 for every t≥0. The concentration gets as close to 40 as we like, but always from below, and the gap shrinks only like t1.
c)
C(t)=30 means 40t=30(30+t), so 10t=900 and t=90 min. C(t)=36 means 40t=36(30+t), so 4t=1080 and t=270 min. The first 30 g/L take 90 minutes; the next 6 g/L take 180 more minutes, twice as long. Near a horizontal asymptote, each further step toward the limit costs more time than the last: with the gap equal to 30+t1200, halving the gap means roughly doubling 30+t.
d)
The volume 600+20t reaches 10000 L when 20t=9400, that is at t=470 min. Then C(470)=50040⋅470=50018800=37.6 g/L. So in this tank the concentration never gets beyond 37.6 g/L: the tank is full long before the limit could matter. What the limit does tell you: 40 g/L is a ceiling the concentration can never exceed, and the direction in which the model is heading. What it does not tell you: that the value 40 is ever reached, or even approached closely, within the life of the model. A limit at infinity is a property of the formula; whether t can really go to infinity is a question about the tank.
e)
Starting with 600 L at 10 g/L, the tank holds 6000 g of salt at t=0, so the salt is 6000+800t and C1(t)=600+20t6000+800t=30+t300+40t. Starting at 50 g/L, the initial salt is 30000 g and C2(t)=30+t1500+40t. Both tend to 140=40: the limit depends only on the incoming brine and forgets the initial state. The sides: C1(t)−40=30+t300−1200=−30+t900<0, so C1 approaches 40 from below; C2(t)−40=30+t1500−1200=30+t300>0, so C2 comes down to 40 from above, the stronger initial brine being diluted by the weaker one. The solution figure shows the three tanks, and the three curves closing in on the same line.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 10: Terminal velocity: two skydivers and a parachute
7 answers to check
Two skydivers jump from rest. Air resistance grows with speed until it balances the weight, so each speed approaches a TERMINAL VELOCITY: the limit of the speed as t→∞. Jumper A, in a position where drag is roughly proportional to the speed, falls at vA(t)=50(1−e−t/5) m/s. Jumper B, for whom drag grows like the square of the speed, falls at vB(t)=60⋅et/3+1et/3−1 m/s, with t in seconds.
No calculator: give exact answers, then estimate them with ln2≈0.69, ln3≈1.10, ln5≈1.61 and e>2.7 if needed. The figure shows the two speeds.
a) Find the terminal velocity of each jumper, as a limit.
b) Prove that neither jumper ever reaches their terminal velocity.
c) How long does each jumper take to reach 80% of their own terminal velocity?
d) Jumper A opens a parachute when falling at 45 m/s. With the clock reset to s=0 at that moment, the speed becomes w(s)=5+40e−2s m/s. Find the new terminal velocity and from which side it is approached, and the time needed to slow down to 10 m/s.
e) Show that 20 s after the jump, jumper A is within 1 m/s of the terminal velocity, even though it is never reached.
Show the solution
Answers
a)50 m/s for A, 60 m/s for B.
b)50−vA(t)=50e−t/5>0 and 60−vB(t)=et/3+1120>0.
c)A: t=5ln5≈8.05 s; B: t=3ln9=6ln3≈6.6 s.
d)5 m/s, approached from above; s=23ln2≈1.04 s.
e)50−vA(20)=50e−4<1 because e4>2.74=53.1441>50.
a)
As t→∞, −5t→−∞ and eu→0 as u→−∞, so e−t/5→0 and vA(t)→50(1−0)=50 m/s. For B, both et/3−1 and et/3+1 tend to ∞: the form ∞∞. Divide by the dominant term et/3: vB(t)=60⋅1+e−t/31−e−t/3→60⋅11=60 m/s. On the figure these are the two horizontal asymptotes v=50 and v=60. Answering “∞∞=1, so 60” gets the right number for a wrong reason and loses the method mark.
b)
50−vA(t)=50e−t/5, and an exponential is always positive, so vA(t)<50 for every t. For B: 60−vB(t)=60⋅et/3+1(et/3+1)−(et/3−1)=et/3+1120>0, so vB(t)<60 for every t. Both speeds approach their limit from below and never reach it: the terminal velocity is a horizontal asymptote, not a value of the function. Physically, the drag equals the weight only in the limit, so the acceleration is never exactly zero.
c)
Jumper A: vA(t)=40 means 1−e−t/5=54, so e−t/5=51, −5t=−ln5 and t=5ln5≈5×1.61=8.05 s. Jumper B: vB(t)=48 means u+1u−1=54 with u=et/3, so 5u−5=4u+4 and u=9; then 3t=ln9=2ln3 and t=6ln3≈6.6 s. Jumper B reaches 80% of a HIGHER terminal velocity sooner. The substitution u=et/3 turns the equation into a linear one: solve for u first, take the logarithm last.
d)
As s→∞, e−2s→0, so w(s)→5 m/s: the new terminal velocity, about ten times smaller. Since w(s)−5=40e−2s>0, the speed comes DOWN to 5 m/s from above: the jumper is slowed by the parachute and approaches the asymptote from the other side. Slowing to 10 m/s: 40e−2s=5, so e−2s=81, 2s=ln8=3ln2 and s=23ln2≈1.5×0.69≈1.04 s. The side of approach is read on the sign of w(s)−5, exactly as the side of an oblique asymptote is read on the sign of the remainder.
e)
At t=20 s the gap is 50−vA(20)=50e−4. It is less than 1 exactly when e4>50. Since e>2.7, e4>2.74, and by hand 2.72=7.29 and 7.292=53.1441, so e4>53.1441>50. Hence 50−vA(20)<1: after 20 s jumper A falls at more than 49 m/s, within 1 m/s of the terminal velocity, and yet vA(t)<50 forever by b). This is the practical meaning of a limit at infinity: not that the value is reached, but that the gap becomes as small as any tolerance we fix, from some time on.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
Something missing from this set?A type of exercise your teacher gives, a problem you are stuck on, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.
Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space.
Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.