Exercise 1: Rolle's theorem: three hypotheses, checked one by one
Rolle's theorem. Let be a function such that (1) is continuous on the CLOSED interval ; (2) is differentiable on the OPEN interval ; (3) . Then there is at least one number in such that .
A theorem is a contract: the conclusion is owed only when every hypothesis has been checked, with a reason, on the right interval. The figure shows on .
- a) Verify the three hypotheses of Rolle's theorem for on , then find ALL the numbers that satisfy the conclusion.
- b) Same question for on .
- c) Let on . Show that but that has no solution in . Which hypothesis fails, and where?
- d) , yet never vanishes. Does this contradict Rolle's theorem?
- e) Let for and . Check each hypothesis on and decide whether the conclusion holds.
Show the solution
Answers
- a) All three hold; , and .
- b) All three hold (); .
- c) and ; hypothesis (2) fails at .
- d) No: is not defined at , so hypothesis (1) fails.
- e) (2) and (3) hold, (1) fails at ; , so the conclusion is false.
a) Hypothesis (1): is a polynomial, so it is continuous on , in particular on . Hypothesis (2): a polynomial is differentiable on , in particular on . Hypothesis (3): and . The theorem applies. By the power rule, , which vanishes at , and , all three in . So : the theorem promised AT LEAST one number and there are three, the two low points at height and the local high point at the origin that the figure shows. Writing only the hypotheses that happen to be easy, or writing them without a reason (polynomial, hence continuous), loses the method marks even with the right .
b) Sine and cosine are continuous and differentiable on , so (1) and (2) hold on and . For (3): and . Then means ; on , , so we may divide: , and . The other solutions of , such as , lie outside the interval and are not answers. At the curve reaches , its top on the interval.
c) The fifth root is defined for every real number, so is continuous on , and : hypotheses (1) and (3) hold. For , the power rule gives , a fraction with numerator , never . At , the difference quotient is , which tends to as and to as : does not exist. Hypothesis (2) fails at ONE point, , inside , and that is enough to lose the conclusion. The graph has a cusp at the origin: a lowest point without a horizontal tangent.
d) No contradiction, because the theorem does not apply. is not defined at , which lies in , and near it: hypothesis (1) fails (and (2) with it). The equal values at the ends are only one hypothesis out of three. Here wherever it is defined, so the slope is never , and it cannot be, since the graph is made of two separate branches. The trap is to read hypothesis (3) and stop there.
e) Hypothesis (3): . Hypothesis (2): on , , so is differentiable there with . Hypothesis (1) fails at the right endpoint: , so is not continuous at . The conclusion is false, since everywhere in . The closed bracket in hypothesis (1) is not decoration: continuity AT the endpoints is what forbids the graph from jumping back down to its starting height at the last moment.
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks from one visit to the next and tells you which chapter to tackle next. Create your space, an email is enough.