MATH 203 Calculus I • Concordia University, Montreal
Corrected exercises: concavity and curve sketching (MATH 203)
This is the corrected exercise set for concavity and curve sketching in MATH 203, Differential and Integral Calculus I, at Concordia University, section 4.4 of Thomas' Calculus.The second derivative gives the concavity, the points of inflection and a second test for local extrema, and the chapter ends with the complete sketch: domain, intercepts, symmetry, asymptotes, increase, concavity, then one table and the curve.
What the set covers, the traps it targets
The second derivative gives the concavity, the points of inflection and a second test for local extrema, and the chapter ends with the complete sketch: domain, intercepts, symmetry, asymptotes, increase, concavity, then one table and the curve.
A scientific calculator is allowed, so decimals appear where a context asks for them, but every derivative is computed and FACTORED by hand.
The thread running through the whole set: the concavity is read on the sign of f′′, and that sign can only be read on a factored form. In MATH 203 the marks are lost between the rule and the sign table, in the algebra: a quotient rule applied twice and then expanded instead of pulling out the common factor x2+c and cancelling one power of it; a fractional power differentiated without factoring out the SMALLEST power; an exponential left inside a sum instead of pulled out as a factor that is never zero. Each solution names the gesture where it pays.
The traps named in the solutions: a zero of f′′ taken for a point of inflection, a point where f′′ does not exist forgotten as a candidate, a zero of f′′ outside the domain, a factor x divided out and lost, the silent Second Derivative Test read as no extremum, a cusp taken for a point of inflection, concave up confused with increasing, the tallest curve taken for f, a calculator left in degree mode, and a table of values trusted to locate an inflection point exactly.
•Concavity Test: f′′>0 on I gives concave up on I, f′′<0 gives concave down. Concave up means f′ increasing, NOT f increasing.
•Point of inflection: a point (c,f(c)) of the graph, with a tangent line (possibly vertical), where the concavity changes.
•Candidates: f′′(c)=0 or f′′(c) undefined, with c in the domain. Keep a candidate only if f′′ changes sign.
•Second Derivative Test: f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)<0 give a local max, f′′(c)>0 a local min; f′′(c)=0 gives NO information.
•Algebra: (vnu)′ has the factor vn−1 in its numerator, cancel one power; x1/3=x−5/3x2, factor out the smallest power; e−x>0 never changes a sign.
•Curve sketching: domain, intercepts, symmetry, asymptotes, f′ factored, f′′ factored, one table, then the curve.
Part A: the basics (/50)
Exercise 1: Inflection points: a zero of the second derivative is neither necessary nor sufficient
9 answers to check
Concavity Test (Thomas 4.4): if f′′>0 on an interval I, the graph of f is concave up on I; if f′′<0, concave down. A point (c,f(c)) where the graph has a tangent line (possibly vertical) and where the concavity CHANGES is a point of inflection.
The candidates are therefore the numbers where f′′(c)=0 AND the numbers of the domain where f′′(c) does not exist; a candidate is kept only if the sign of f′′ changes there. The figure shows the graph of the function h of part c).
a) Let f(x)=x4+2x3−12x2+3. Find the intervals on which f is concave up or concave down, and the points of inflection.
b) Let g(x)=(x−2)4+3x. Show that g′′(2)=0, then decide whether (2,g(2)) is a point of inflection. Do not expand (x−2)4.
c) Let h(x)=x7/3−7x1/3. Show that h′′(x)=9x5/314(2x2+1) by factoring out the smallest power of x, and check that the equation h′′(x)=0 has no solution. Does h have a point of inflection? Describe the tangent line there.
d) A student's rule reads: the points of inflection are exactly the solutions of f′′(x)=0. Use b) and c) to show that the rule fails in BOTH directions.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Concave up on (−∞,−2) and (1,∞), concave down on (−2,1); inflection points (−2,−45) and (1,−6).
b)g′′(x)=12(x−2)2≥0: no sign change, so no inflection point; g is concave up on R.
c)h′′ never vanishes, but changes sign at 0 where h′′ is undefined: inflection point (0,0) with a VERTICAL tangent.
d)g′′(2)=0 without inflection (not sufficient); h has an inflection where h′′ does not exist (not necessary).
a)
f′(x)=4x3+6x2−24x and f′′(x)=12x2+12x−24=12(x2+x−2)=12(x+2)(x−1). Factor BEFORE looking at signs: a product of two linear factors has the sign + outside its roots and − between them. So f′′>0 on (−∞,−2) and (1,∞), where f is concave up, and f′′<0 on (−2,1), where it is concave down. The sign changes at −2 and at 1, both in the domain, and a polynomial has a tangent line everywhere: two points of inflection, f(−2)=16−16−48+3=−45 and f(1)=1+2−12+3=−6. A point of inflection is a POINT: writing only x=−2 and x=1 loses half a mark on most MATH 203 finals.
b)
Chain rule with inner function x−2: g′(x)=4(x−2)3+3 and g′′(x)=12(x−2)2, so g′′(2)=0. But (x−2)2≥0 on both sides of 2: g′′ does NOT change sign, and g is concave up on (−∞,2) and on (2,∞), hence on all of R. The candidate is rejected: no inflection point. This is why the question says not to expand: (x−2)4=x4−8x3+24x2−32x+16 gives g′′(x)=12x2−48x+48, and the student who expands must now FACTOR it back into 12(x−2)2 to read its sign. The factored form was there from the start; expanding it costs time on an exam and often a sign.
c)
Differentiate term by term with the power rule: h′(x)=37x4/3−37x−2/3 and h′′(x)=928x1/3+914x−5/3. Now the algebraic gesture of the chapter: factor out the SMALLEST power, x−5/3. Since x1/3=x−5/3⋅x2, h′′(x)=914x−5/3(2x2+1)=9x5/314(2x2+1). The factor 2x2+1≥1 never vanishes, so h′′(x)=0 has NO solution. Yet x5/3=(3x)5 has the sign of x: h′′<0 for x<0 (concave down) and h′′>0 for x>0 (concave up). The candidate is x=0, where h′′ does not exist but h(0)=0 does. The tangent line: h′(x)=3x2/37(x2−1), and as x→0 the numerator tends to −7 while 3x2/3→0+ from both sides, so h′(x)→−∞: the graph has a VERTICAL tangent at the origin, which the figure shows. With a tangent line and a change of concavity, (0,0) is a point of inflection. Note that h′′ written as the SUM 928x1/3+914x−5/3 hides everything: its sign is unreadable until the smallest power is out.
d)
Not sufficient: in b), g′′(2)=0 and (2,g(2)) is not a point of inflection, because the sign of g′′ does not change. Not necessary: in c), h′′ never vanishes and (0,0) is a point of inflection, because the candidate there is a point where h′′ does not exist. The correct rule: list the zeros of f′′ AND the points of the domain where f′′ is undefined, then keep a candidate only if f′′ changes sign there and the graph has a tangent line.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.
Exercise 2: The Second Derivative Test, and what to do when it is silent
8 answers to check
Second Derivative Test for Local Extrema (Thomas 4.4): suppose f′′ is continuous on an open interval containing c and f′(c)=0. If f′′(c)<0, f has a local maximum at c; if f′′(c)>0, a local minimum. If f′′(c)=0, the test FAILS: f may have a local maximum, a local minimum, or neither, and the First Derivative Test must decide.
The figure shows the graph of g(x)=x+2cosx on [0,2π], used in part b). A scientific calculator is allowed; give decimal values to four decimal places.
a) Let f(x)=x3−6x2−15x+4. Find the critical numbers of f and classify them with the Second Derivative Test. Give the local extreme values.
b) Let g(x)=x+2cosx on (0,2π). Find the critical numbers and classify them with the Second Derivative Test. Give the exact local extreme values, then their decimal values.
c) Let p(x)=x4+4x3. Show that p has two critical numbers. At which one is the Second Derivative Test silent? Conclude anyway, and say what the graph does at that point.
d) Let k(x)=x4−4x3+6x2−4x+3. Show that k′(1)=k′′(1)=0. Recognize a binomial in k(x), and conclude about x=1 without any sign table.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Critical numbers −1 and 5; local max f(−1)=12 (f′′(−1)=−18), local min f(5)=−96 (f′′(5)=18).
b)Local max g(6π)=6π+3≈2.2556; local min g(65π)=65π−3≈0.8859.
c)Local min p(−3)=−27; the test is silent at 0, where p has NO extremum: (0,0) is an inflection point with a horizontal tangent.
d)k(x)=(x−1)4+2: absolute minimum k(1)=2, although the test is silent.
a)
f′(x)=3x2−12x−15=3(x2−4x−5)=3(x+1)(x−5), so the critical numbers are −1 and 5. f′′(x)=6x−12. At −1: f′′(−1)=−18<0, local maximum f(−1)=−1−6+15+4=12. At 5: f′′(5)=18>0, local minimum f(5)=125−150−75+4=−96. The test is faster than a sign table here because f′′ is a one-line computation and never vanishes at a critical number. The classic slip is the sign of f′′ itself: f′′(−1) NEGATIVE means concave down, the shape of a cap, and a cap on a horizontal tangent is a maximum.
b)
g′(x)=1−2sinx=0⟺sinx=21, which on (0,2π) gives x=6π and x=65π (the second one comes from sin(π−θ)=sinθ, and forgetting it is the usual loss). g′′(x)=−2cosx. At 6π: g′′=−2⋅23=−3<0, local maximum g(6π)=6π+2⋅23=6π+3≈2.2556. At 65π: g′′=−2⋅(−23)=3>0, local minimum g(65π)=65π−3≈0.8859. Calculator in RADIAN mode: in degree mode, cos6π is computed as the cosine of 0.52 degrees and every decimal is wrong. The figure agrees: a small bump then a small dip, and the line y=x wins after that.
c)
p′(x)=4x3+12x2=4x2(x+3): factor out the common 4x2 instead of dividing by x, which would lose the root 0. Critical numbers 0 and −3. p′′(x)=12x2+24x=12x(x+2). At −3: p′′(−3)=36>0, local minimum p(−3)=81−108=−27. At 0: p′′(0)=0, the test is SILENT. It does not say no extremum; it says nothing. The First Derivative Test decides: 4x2≥0, so near 0 the sign of p′ is the sign of x+3, positive on both sides of 0. No sign change, no extremum. Moreover p′′=12x(x+2) changes sign at 0 (from − to +): the origin is a point of inflection where the tangent line is HORIZONTAL, a flat step in the graph.
d)
k′(x)=4x3−12x2+12x−4, so k′(1)=4−12+12−4=0, and k′′(x)=12x2−24x+12, so k′′(1)=0: the test is silent again. Now look at the coefficients 1,−4,6,−4: they are those of (x−1)4=x4−4x3+6x2−4x+1. So k(x)=(x−1)4+2. Since (x−1)4≥0 with equality only at x=1, k(x)≥2=k(1) for every x: k has an ABSOLUTE minimum 2 at x=1. Compare with c): at both points f′=f′′=0, and the conclusions are opposite (no extremum in c), a minimum in d)). That is exactly what the word fails means. The algebra did the work: recognizing the binomial replaced a whole sign table, and k′(x)=4(x−1)3 is then read at a glance.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 3: The quotient rule twice: pull out the common factor before you expand
11 answers to check
Sketch the graph of f(x)=x2+27x2−9 by the procedure of Thomas 4.4: domain, intercepts, symmetry, asymptotes, f′ and its sign, f′′ and its sign, then one table and the curve.
The second derivative of a quotient is where most MATH 203 copies go wrong: the numerator given by the quotient rule contains a factor of the denominator, and it must be pulled out and cancelled BEFORE anything is expanded.
a) Find the domain, the intercepts and the symmetry of f. Show that f(x)=1−x2+2736 and deduce the horizontal asymptote and the position of the graph relative to it.
b) Show that f′(x)=(x2+27)272x. Find the intervals of increase and decrease and the extreme value of f.
c) Apply the quotient rule to f′. Show that the numerator has the factor x2+27, cancel it, and obtain f′′(x)=(x2+27)3216(9−x2). Compute f′′(0).
d) Study the concavity and give the points of inflection. What is the slope of the graph at each of them?
e) Sketch the graph and give the range of f.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Domain R; intercepts (±3,0) and (0,−31); f is even; asymptote y=1 at both ends, graph always BELOW it.
b)Decreasing on (−∞,0], increasing on [0,∞); absolute minimum f(0)=−31.
c)f′′(x)=(x2+27)3216(9−x2), f′′(0)=818.
d)Concave up on (−3,3), down on (−∞,−3) and (3,∞); inflection points (−3,0) and (3,0), slopes −61 and 61.
e)Range [−31,1).
a)
x2+27≥27>0, so the domain is R and there is no vertical asymptote. f(0)=−279=−31; f(x)=0⟺x2=9⟺x=±3. Only x2 appears, so f(−x)=f(x): f is even. Add and subtract 36 in the numerator: x2+27x2−9=x2+27(x2+27)−36=1−x2+2736. As x→±∞, x2+2736→0, so y=1 is the horizontal asymptote at both ends; and since x2+2736>0, f(x)<1 everywhere: the graph stays BELOW its asymptote and never reaches it.
b)
Quotient rule: f′(x)=(x2+27)22x(x2+27)−(x2−9)(2x). Factor the common 2x out of the numerator before expanding anything: 2x[(x2+27)−(x2−9)]=2x⋅36=72x. So f′(x)=(x2+27)272x, which has the sign of x (the denominator is a positive square). f decreases on (−∞,0], increases on [0,∞), and since it decreases then increases on the WHOLE line, f(0)=−31 is the absolute minimum. The form 1−x2+2736 gives the same derivative in one line by the chain rule: dxd[−36(x2+27)−1]=36(x2+27)−2(2x).
c)
Quotient rule on (x2+27)272x, the derivative of the denominator by the chain rule being 2(x2+27)(2x): f′′(x)=(x2+27)472(x2+27)2−72x⋅2(x2+27)(2x). Both terms of the numerator contain x2+27: pull it out, 72(x2+27)[(x2+27)−4x2]=72(x2+27)(27−3x2), and cancel ONE power against the denominator: f′′(x)=(x2+27)372(27−3x2)=(x2+27)3216(9−x2). The expanding route gives the numerator −216x4−3888x2+52488 over (x2+27)4: correct, but a degree 4 polynomial with large coefficients whose sign must now be found by factoring it back, which is where the marks go. f′′(0)=273216×9=196831944=818.
d)
The denominator (x2+27)3 is positive, so f′′ has the sign of 9−x2=(3−x)(3+x): positive on (−3,3), where f is concave up, negative for ∣x∣>3, where f is concave down. The sign changes at ±3, which are in the domain: two points of inflection, (−3,0) and (3,0). They are also the x-intercepts: the graph crosses the axis exactly where it changes its bending. The slopes there: f′(3)=362216=1296216=61 and, by symmetry, f′(−3)=−61. Consistency with the asymptote: an increasing curve that levels off below y=1 must end concave DOWN, which is what f′′<0 for x>3 says.
e)
The table from left to right: coming from just below y=1 on the far left, decreasing and concave down; inflection at (−3,0); concave up down to the minimum (0,−31); up again, inflection at (3,0); then concave down toward y=1 from below. Range: the minimum −31 is reached, the value 1 never is, and every value between is taken by continuity: [−31,1).
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 4: A square root: factor out the smallest power, and reject a zero outside the domain
11 answers to check
Sketch the graph of f(x)=(x−2)x+1. A square root brings a one-sided domain, an endpoint where the derivative may blow up, and derivatives made of powers 21, −21, −23 whose sign is unreadable until they are FACTORED.
A scientific calculator is allowed, but every value asked for here is exact.
a) Find the domain, the intercepts and the sign of f, and limx→∞f(x). Does the graph have an asymptote?
b) Show that f′(x)=2x+13x by writing f′ over the common denominator 2x+1. Find the critical number and describe the tangent line at the endpoint (−1,0).
c) Write f′(x)=23x(x+1)−1/2, differentiate, factor out the smallest power (x+1)−3/2 and show that f′′(x)=4(x+1)3/23(x+2). The equation f′′(x)=0 gives x=−2: is there a point of inflection? Study the concavity.
d) Classify the critical number with the Second Derivative Test, compute f′′(0), and explain why the extremum is absolute. Give the range of f.
e) Compute the slope of the graph where it crosses the positive x-axis, then sketch the graph.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Domain [−1,∞); intercepts (−1,0), (2,0), (0,−2); f<0 on (−1,2), f>0 for x>2; f→∞, no asymptote.
b)Critical number 0; vertical tangent at (−1,0) since f′(x)→−∞ as x→−1+.
c)x=−2 is NOT in the domain: no inflection point; f is concave up on (−1,∞).
d)f′′(0)=23>0: minimum f(0)=−2, absolute; range [−2,∞).
e)f′(2)=3.
a)
x+1 requires x+1≥0: the domain is [−1,∞). f(x)=0⟺x=2 or x=−1, and f(0)=−2⋅1=−2. Since x+1≥0, f has the sign of x−2: negative on (−1,2), positive after 2. As x→∞ both factors tend to ∞, so f→∞. No vertical asymptote (f is continuous on its closed domain), no horizontal one, and no slant one either, because xf(x)=(1−x2)x+1→∞. There is no symmetry to look for: the domain itself is not symmetric about 0.
b)
Product rule, then chain rule on the root (inner function x+1): f′(x)=x+1+2x+1x−2. As a SUM, its sign is unreadable. Over the common denominator: x+1=2x+12(x+1), so f′(x)=2x+12(x+1)+(x−2)=2x+13x for x>−1. The denominator is positive: f′ has the sign of x. Critical number 0 (f′(0)=0). At the endpoint, as x→−1+ the numerator tends to −3 and the denominator to 0+: f′(x)→−∞. The graph leaves (−1,0) with a VERTICAL tangent, going down.
c)
Product rule on 23x(x+1)−1/2: f′′(x)=23[(x+1)−1/2−21x(x+1)−3/2]. The two powers are −21 and −23; the SMALLEST is −23, and (x+1)−1/2=(x+1)−3/2(x+1). So f′′(x)=23(x+1)−3/2[(x+1)−2x]=23(x+1)−3/2⋅2x+2=4(x+1)3/23(x+2). The frequent error is to factor out (x+1)−1/2, the power that looks smaller because 21<23: the bracket then keeps a negative power inside, and the sign is still hidden. Now f′′(x)=0 gives x=−2, but −2<−1 is not in the domain: it is NOT a candidate, and there is no point of inflection. On the whole domain x+2>1>0, so f′′>0: f is concave up on (−1,∞).
d)
f′′(0)=4⋅13⋅2=23>0 and f′(0)=0: by the Second Derivative Test, f has a local minimum f(0)=−2. It is absolute: f′<0 on (−1,0) and f′>0 on (0,∞), so f decreases on all of [−1,0] and increases on all of [0,∞). The range: from its minimum −2 the function increases without bound, and it is continuous, so the range is [−2,∞). The value at the endpoint, f(−1)=0, is a local maximum in Thomas' sense for an endpoint, but not the largest value.
e)
The positive x-intercept is x=2: f′(2)=233⋅2=33=3 (rationalize: 33=333). The sketch: start at (−1,0) with a vertical tangent, go down to (0,−2) where the tangent is horizontal, come back up through (2,0) with slope 3, and rise without bound, bending upward all the way. A drawing with an S shape near x=−2 would be drawing a point that does not exist.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 5: Three curves to match: f, its derivative and its second derivative
12 answers to check
The figure shows, on [−3,3], the graphs of a function f, of f′ and of f′′, labelled A, B and C in no particular order. The function is f(x)=xe−x2, but part a) must be answered from the figure alone.
The rule behind every matching question: where one curve has a horizontal tangent, the NEXT one (its derivative) crosses the axis; where a curve rises, the next one is above the axis.
a) From the figure alone, decide which curve is f, which is f′ and which is f′′. Give two independent reasons.
b) Compute f′(x) and f′′(x), pulling out the factor e−x2 at each step. Check on the figure the values f′(0) and f′′(1).
c) Find the local extrema of f and its points of inflection, with exact coordinates.
d) At which x is the slope of f largest, and what is that slope? Explain why this point is a point of inflection of f.
e) Show that f is odd. What does that say about the symmetry of f′ and of f′′? Check it on the figure.
c)Local max (21,2e1), local min (−21,−2e1); inflection points (0,0) and (±23,±23e−3/2).
d)At x=0, slope 1: the maximum of f′, where f′′ changes sign.
e)f odd, so f′ is even and f′′ is odd.
a)
Curve C has horizontal tangents near x=±0.7, and curve A crosses the axis exactly there: A is the derivative of C. Curve A has horizontal tangents at 0 and near ±1.2, and curve B crosses the axis at those three places: B is the derivative of A. So C is f, A is f′, B is f′′. Second, independent reason, by signs: between the two horizontal tangents of C the curve rises, and curve A is above the axis there; outside, C falls and A is below. Third check: C is odd (symmetric about the origin), A is even (symmetric about the y-axis), B is odd again, and derivatives alternate between odd and even, as e) proves. The TALLEST curve is not f: here f′′ reaches about 1.95 while f never exceeds 0.43.
b)
Product rule and chain rule (inner function −x2, derivative −2x): f′(x)=e−x2+x⋅(−2x)e−x2. Pull out the exponential, which is a factor of BOTH terms: f′(x)=(1−2x2)e−x2. Again: f′′(x)=−4xe−x2+(1−2x2)(−2x)e−x2=[−4x−2x+4x3]e−x2=2x(2x2−3)e−x2. The gain of factoring is immediate: e−x2>0 for every x, so the sign of f′ is the sign of 1−2x2 and the sign of f′′ is the sign of 2x(2x2−3), two polynomials read at a glance. Checks: f′(0)=1, the top of curve A; f′′(1)=2(2−3)e−1=−e2≈−0.7358, and curve B is indeed near −0.74 at x=1.
c)
f′ changes from − to + at −21 and from + to − at 21: local minimum and local maximum, f(21)=21e−1/2=2e1≈0.4289, and its opposite at −21. For the concavity, 2x(2x2−3) vanishes at 0 and at x2=23, x=±23=±26≈±1.2247, and changes sign at each: f′′<0 on (−∞,−26), >0 on (−26,0), <0 on (0,26), >0 after. Three points of inflection: (0,0) and (±26,±26e−3/2), about (±1.2247,±0.2733). A copy that stops at 2x2=3 after dividing by x loses the inflection at the origin: never divide by a factor that can vanish, factor it out.
d)
The slope of f is f′(x), whose largest value, read on curve A and confirmed by f′(x)=(1−2x2)e−x2≤1⋅1 (both factors are at most 1 where f′≥0), is f′(0)=1. A maximum of f′ is a place where f′ stops increasing and starts decreasing, which is exactly a change of sign of (f′)′=f′′: the steepest point of f is a point of inflection. That is the geometric meaning of an inflection point, and the reason it matters in applications: the RATE is extreme there.
e)
f(−x)=(−x)e−(−x)2=−xe−x2=−f(x): f is odd. Differentiating f(−x)=−f(x) with the chain rule gives −f′(−x)=−f′(x), so f′(−x)=f′(x): f′ is even. Differentiating once more, −f′′(−x)=f′′(x): f′′ is odd. On the figure, A is symmetric about the y-axis and B about the origin, which was the third reason of a).
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Part B: problems and reasoning (/50)
Exercise 6: A fractional power of a quadratic: two cusps, and inflection points far from them
10 answers to check
Sketch the graph of f(x)=(x2−2x)2/3, defined for every real x since (x2−2x)2/3=(3x2−2x)2. The derivative does not exist at two points of the domain, and the second derivative shows the algebraic gesture of the chapter in its purest form: two powers of x2−2x, and the smaller one must come out.
A scientific calculator is allowed for decimal values, to four decimal places.
a) Find the domain, the intercepts and the sign of f, and its limits at ±∞. Show that f(2−x)=f(x): what symmetry of the graph does this give?
b) Show that f′(x)=3(x2−2x)1/34(x−1) and list ALL the critical numbers. Classify them with a sign table of f′ and describe the graph at x=0 and x=2.
c) Differentiate f′(x)=34(x−1)(x2−2x)−1/3 with the product rule, factor out (x2−2x)−4/3 and show that f′′(x)=9(x2−2x)4/34(x2−2x−2). Compute f′′(1) and confirm the nature of the critical number 1.
d) Study the concavity and find the points of inflection. Are the cusps points of inflection?
e) Sketch the graph. The function is concave down on (1−3,0), on (0,2) and on (2,1+3): is it concave down on the whole interval (1−3,1+3)?
Show the solution
Answers
a)Domain R, f≥0; intercepts (0,0) and (2,0); f→∞ at both ends; graph symmetric about the line x=1.
b)Critical numbers 0, 1, 2; minima f(0)=f(2)=0 at two cusps, local max f(1)=1.
c)f′′(1)=−34<0: local maximum at 1 confirmed.
d)Concave up for x<1−3 and x>1+3, down between (except at 0 and 2); inflection points (1±3,34); the cusps are not.
e)No: the cusps break the concavity; f is concave down on each of the three pieces only.
a)
The cube root is defined for every real number, so the domain is R and f is continuous everywhere. As a square, f≥0, with f=0⟺x2−2x=x(x−2)=0⟺x=0 or x=2; the y-intercept is the origin. As x→±∞, x2−2x→∞ and f→∞: no horizontal asymptote, and no slant one since f(x) grows like ∣x∣4/3, faster than any line. Symmetry: (2−x)2−2(2−x)=4−4x+x2−4+2x=x2−2x, so f(2−x)=f(x). The points x and 2−x are mirror images across the vertical line x=1: the graph is symmetric about x=1. It is neither even nor odd, and looking only for those two symmetries misses it. Completing the square says the same thing: x2−2x=(x−1)2−1.
b)
Chain rule with inner function x2−2x: f′(x)=32(x2−2x)−1/3(2x−2)=3(x2−2x)1/34(x−1). Critical numbers: f′(1)=0, and f′ does not exist at x=0 and x=2, which ARE in the domain. Three critical numbers. The cube root has the sign of its argument x(x−2), so the table reads: for x<0, (+)(−)<0; on (0,1), (−)(−)>0; on (1,2), (−)(+)<0; for x>2, f′>0. First Derivative Test: local minima f(0)=f(2)=0, local maximum f(1)=(−1)2/3=(3−1)2=1. At x=2: f′(x)→−∞ as x→2− and +∞ as x→2+ (numerator near 34, denominator →0∓). The tangent turns vertical from both sides while the graph goes down then up: a CUSP, and by symmetry another one at 0.
c)
Product rule: f′′(x)=34(x2−2x)−1/3+34(x−1)⋅(−31)(x2−2x)−4/3(2x−2). The powers are −31 and −34; the smallest is −34, and (x2−2x)−1/3=(x2−2x)−4/3(x2−2x). So f′′(x)=94(x2−2x)−4/3[3(x2−2x)−2(x−1)2], and the bracket is 3x2−6x−2x2+4x−2=x2−2x−2: f′′(x)=9(x2−2x)4/34(x2−2x−2). The denominator (x2−2x)4/3=(3x2−2x)4 is POSITIVE for x=0,2: an even power of a cube root, whatever the sign inside. f′′(1)=9⋅(−1)4/34(1−2−2)=9⋅14(−3)=−34<0, with f′(1)=0: the Second Derivative Test confirms the local maximum at 1. At 0 and 2 the test cannot even be applied, since f′ does not exist there.
d)
f′′ has the sign of x2−2x−2, whose roots are x=22±4+8=1±3, about −0.7321 and 2.7321: positive outside them, concave up; negative between them (except at 0 and 2, where f′′ is undefined), concave down. The sign changes at 1±3, points of the domain where the graph has a tangent: points of inflection. There x2−2x=(x−1)2−1=3−1=2, so f=22/3=34≈1.5874: the points (1±3,34). At the cusps, f′′ is undefined but NEGATIVE on both sides: no change of concavity, and in any case no tangent line. The cusps are not points of inflection.
e)
The graph: from the far left, coming down, concave up; inflection at (1−3,34); concave down into the cusp (0,0); up, concave down, to the rounded top (1,1); down, concave down, into the cusp (2,0); up again, concave down until (1+3,34), then concave up; all of it symmetric about x=1. On (1−3,1+3) as a whole, f is NOT concave down. Thomas defines concave down on an interval as f′ decreasing on that interval, and f′ jumps from −∞ to +∞ across 2: it is not decreasing across the cusp. Geometrically, the chord from (2−h,f(2−h)) to (2+h,f(2+h)) lies ABOVE the cusp point, which a concave down curve never allows. Concavity is decided piece by piece, and a point where f′ does not exist cuts the pieces.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 7: An exponential study: pull out e to the minus x, and meet a flat inflection point
8 answers to check
Sketch the graph of f(x)=x3e−x. Every derivative of a product by e−x is again a polynomial times e−x, provided the exponential is pulled out as a common factor at each step; then its sign is decided by the polynomial alone, since e−x>0.
A scientific calculator is allowed; give decimal values to four decimal places. L'Hôpital's Rule may be used as a tool.
a) Find the domain, the intercept and the sign of f. Find limx→−∞f(x) and limx→∞f(x), naming the form of each limit before computing it. Give the horizontal asymptote.
b) Show that f′(x)=x2(3−x)e−x. Find the critical numbers, and classify them.
c) Show that f′′(x)=x(x2−6x+6)e−x. Find the intervals of concavity and the three points of inflection, with exact x-coordinates and decimal y-coordinates.
d) Compute f′′(3) and f′′(0). What does the Second Derivative Test say at each critical number, and what does the origin look like on the graph?
e) Gather the results in one table, sketch the graph and give the range of f.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Domain R; intercept (0,0); f has the sign of x; f→−∞ at −∞; f→0 at +∞ (asymptote y=0 on the right only).
b)Critical numbers 0 and 3; no extremum at 0; absolute maximum f(3)=27e−3≈1.3443.
c)Concave down on (−∞,0) and (3−3,3+3), up on (0,3−3) and (3+3,∞); inflections at x=0, 3−3 (y≈0.5736), 3+3 (y≈0.9334).
d)f′′(3)=−9e−3≈−0.4481: maximum; f′′(0)=0: silent, and (0,0) is a flat inflection point.
e)Range (−∞,27e−3].
a)
f is defined on R; f(0)=0 is the only intercept, since e−x>0; and f has the sign of x3, that of x. As x→−∞: x3→−∞ and e−x→+∞, a form (−∞)(+∞) which is NOT indeterminate: f→−∞. As x→∞: x3→∞ and e−x→0, the form ∞⋅0, indeterminate. Rewrite f(x)=exx3, form ∞∞, and apply L'Hôpital's Rule three times, checking the form each time: ex3x2, ex6x, ex6→0. So y=0 is a horizontal asymptote on the RIGHT only; on the left the graph plunges.
b)
Product rule: f′(x)=3x2e−x+x3(−e−x). Pull out every common factor, not only the exponential: f′(x)=x2e−x(3−x). Critical numbers: 0 and 3. Signs: x2≥0 and e−x>0, so f′ has the sign of 3−x, positive on both sides of 0 and changing from + to − at 3. So 0 is NOT an extremum (f increases through it), and f(3)=27e−3≈1.3443 is a local maximum, even the absolute maximum since f increases on all of (−∞,3] and decreases on all of [3,∞).
c)
Write f′(x)=(3x2−x3)e−x and differentiate once more: f′′(x)=(6x−3x2)e−x−(3x2−x3)e−x=(x3−6x2+6x)e−x=x(x2−6x+6)e−x. The quadratic formula gives the roots of x2−6x+6: x=26±36−24=3±3, about 1.2679 and 4.7321. So f′′ has the sign of x(x−(3−3))(x−(3+3)): − on (−∞,0), + on (0,3−3), − on (3−3,3+3), + on (3+3,∞). Three changes of sign, three points of inflection: (0,0), (3−3,f(3−3))≈(1.2679,0.5736) and (3+3,f(3+3))≈(4.7321,0.9334). The trap: dividing x3−6x2+6x=0 by x and keeping only 3±3, which loses the most important one.
d)
f′′(3)=3(9−18+6)e−3=−9e−3≈−0.4481<0: the Second Derivative Test confirms the maximum at 3. f′′(0)=0: the test is silent at 0, and b) already decided with the First Derivative Test, no extremum. What the origin looks like: f′(0)=0, a HORIZONTAL tangent, and f′′ changes sign there, from concave down to concave up. The graph flattens, crosses its own tangent line y=0, and keeps rising: a flat point of inflection, like the one of x3 at the origin.
e)
The table, left to right: from −∞ the curve rises, concave down; flat inflection at (0,0); rising and concave up until x=3−3; rising, now concave down, to the maximum (3,27e−3); falling, still concave down, to x=3+3; then falling and concave up, settling on y=0 from above, as a curve that decreases toward an asymptote from above must. Range: every value from −∞ up to the maximum is taken by continuity: (−∞,27e−3].
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 8: Five statements to correct
5 answers to check
Each statement below was written by a student in a MATH 203 assignment on concavity, and each one is false. Say what is wrong, give a counterexample, and write a correct statement. The answer boxes ask which of the proposed functions is a counterexample.
a) If f′′(x)>0 for every x in an interval I, then f is increasing on I.
b) If f′′(c) does not exist, then (c,f(c)) cannot be a point of inflection.
c) If f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)=0, then f has no local extremum at c.
d) If f′′(x)>0 for every real x, then f has an absolute minimum.
e) If f is continuous on (a,c) and concave down on (a,b) and on (b,c), then f is concave down on (a,c).
Show the solution
Answers
a)False: x2 on (−∞,0) is concave up and decreasing. Concave up means f′ increasing, not f.
b)False: x1/3, or h of Exercise 1, has an inflection point at 0 where the second derivative does not exist.
c)False: (x−1)4+2 has a minimum at 1 with f′(1)=f′′(1)=0. The test is silent, it does not say no.
d)False: ex has f′′>0 and no minimum. True if moreover f has a critical number.
e)False: x2/3 with b=0 on (−1,1). True if moreover f is differentiable at b.
a)
FALSE. f(x)=x2 has f′′(x)=2>0 everywhere, and it is DECREASING on (−∞,0). The second derivative is the rate of change of f′, not of f: f′′>0 says that f′ increases, that the slopes grow, and growing slopes can all be negative (−4, −2, −1...). Correct statement (Thomas' definition read the right way): if f′′>0 on I, then f′ is increasing on I and the graph of f is concave up on I. The sign of f′, not of f′′, decides the direction.
b)
FALSE. y=x1/3 has y′′=−92x−5/3, undefined at 0, positive for x<0 and negative for x>0; the graph has a vertical tangent at the origin, so (0,0) is a point of inflection. The function h(x)=x7/3−7x1/3 of Exercise 1 does the same. Correct statement: the candidates for inflection are the points of the domain where f′′=0 OR where f′′ does not exist; each one is decided by the sign of f′′ on both sides.
c)
FALSE. k(x)=(x−1)4+2, the function of Exercise 2 d), has k′(1)=k′′(1)=0 and an absolute minimum at 1. When f′′(c)=0, the Second Derivative Test gives NO information: a local minimum (Exercise 2 d)), a local maximum (3−(x−1)4) or neither (Exercise 2 c) at 0) are all possible. Correct statement: if f′(c)=0 and f′′(c)=0, use the First Derivative Test.
d)
FALSE. f(x)=ex has f′′(x)=ex>0 for every x, and no minimum: its values come as close to 0 as we like without ever reaching it. Being concave up everywhere does not force the graph to turn around. Correct statement: if f′′>0 on R AND f′(c)=0 for some c, then f(c) is the absolute minimum, because f′ is increasing, negative before c and positive after. For instance x2+ex has f′′=2+ex>0 and a critical number between −1 and 0, where f′=2x+ex changes sign.
e)
FALSE. f(x)=x2/3 is continuous, with f′′(x)=−92x−4/3<0 on (−1,0) and on (0,1): concave down on each piece. But on (−1,1) the chord from (−1,1) to (1,1) lies ABOVE the point (0,0) of the graph, as the figure shows, which never happens for a concave down function; and f′ jumps from −∞ to +∞ at 0, so it is not decreasing across 0. The same thing happens at the cusps of Exercise 6. Correct statement: if moreover f is differentiable at b, then f′ is decreasing on the whole of (a,c) and f is concave down on (a,c).
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 9: Fertilizer and wheat: locating the point of diminishing returns
7 answers to check
An agronomist models the extra yield of a wheat field, Y in kilograms per hectare, as a function of the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied, x in kilograms per hectare: Y(x)=x2+30000900x2 for 0≤x≤400. The figure shows the graph of Y.
The derivative Y′(x) is the MARGINAL yield: about how many extra kilograms of wheat one more kilogram of fertilizer brings. The point of diminishing returns is the point of inflection where Y passes from concave up to concave down: beyond it, each extra kilogram of fertilizer still raises the yield, but by less than the previous one. A scientific calculator is allowed.
a) Show that Y′(x)=(x2+30000)254000000x and that Y is increasing on [0,400]. Find limx→∞Y(x) and interpret it for the field.
b) Show that Y′′(x)=(x2+30000)3162000000(10000−x2), pulling out the common factor before expanding. Find the point of diminishing returns exactly.
c) Show that the marginal yield is largest at that point. Give its value, with units, and interpret it.
d) Compute Y(101)−Y(100) and Y(301)−Y(300) to the hundredth, compare them with Y′(100) and Y′(300), and explain what the two numbers show about the fertilizer.
e) On a test plot the agronomist records the yield every 50 kg per hectare: Y(0)=0, Y(50)≈69.23, Y(100)=225, Y(150)≈385.71, Y(200)≈514.29, Y(250)≈608.11. Which 50 kg step brings the largest gain? Explain why it is not the step that ENDS at x=100.
Show the solution
Answers
a)Y′>0 for x>0: increasing; Y→900: the field can never give more than 900 extra kg per hectare.
b)Point of diminishing returns (100,225): 100 kg per hectare of fertilizer, 225 kg per hectare of extra wheat.
c)Y′(100)=3.375 kg of wheat per kg of fertilizer, the largest marginal yield.
d)Y(101)−Y(100)≈3.37 close to Y′(100)=3.375; Y(301)−Y(300)≈1.12 close to Y′(300)=1.125: the same kilogram brings three times less.
e)The step from 100 to 150 (+160.71): its average marginal yield beats the step from 50 to 100 (+155.77), because Y′ decreases slowly after its peak.
a)
Write Y(x)=900x2(x2+30000)−1, or use the quotient rule: Y′(x)=(x2+30000)21800x(x2+30000)−900x2⋅2x. Pull out 1800x: 1800x[(x2+30000)−x2]=1800x⋅30000=54000000x. So Y′(x)=(x2+30000)254000000x>0 for 0<x≤400: Y is increasing, more fertilizer always means more wheat in this model. Dividing by x2, Y(x)=1+30000/x2900→900 as x→∞: whatever the dose, the extra yield stays below 900 kg per hectare. The field saturates.
b)
Quotient rule on Y′, with dxd(x2+30000)2=2(x2+30000)(2x): Y′′(x)=(x2+30000)454×106[(x2+30000)2−x⋅2(x2+30000)(2x)]. Pull out x2+30000 and cancel one power: Y′′(x)=(x2+30000)354×106[(x2+30000)−4x2]=(x2+30000)354×106(30000−3x2)=(x2+30000)3162×106(10000−x2). On [0,400], 10000−x2=(100−x)(100+x) has the sign of 100−x: Y is concave up on [0,100) and concave down on (100,400]. The concavity changes from up to down at x=100, and Y(100)=40000900×10000=225. The point of diminishing returns is (100,225). Expanding (x2+30000)2 at the first step leads to a degree 4 numerator with coefficients in the billions, the typical place where a copy stops.
c)
The sign of Y′′, which is the derivative of Y′, says that Y′ increases on [0,100] and decreases on [100,400]: the marginal yield is largest at x=100. Its value: Y′(100)=(40000)254000000×100=1.6×1095.4×109=3.375 kg of wheat per kg of fertilizer. Around 100 kg per hectare, each extra kilogram of nitrogen brings about 3.4 kg of wheat, the best rate of the whole curve; beyond it, the rate falls. An inflection point of Y is the maximum of the RATE Y′, which is exactly why it is the point the agronomist cares about.
d)
With the calculator, Y(101)−Y(100)≈228.3749−225≈3.37, very close to Y′(100)=3.375: the derivative is the gain of one more unit, approximately. Y′(300)=(120000)254×106×300=1.44×10101.62×1010=1.125, and Y(301)−Y(300)≈1.12. The kilogram of fertilizer added at 300 kg per hectare still increases the yield, but brings three times less wheat than the one added at 100: that is what diminishing returns means, and it is the concave down part of the curve. Whether the 301st kilogram is worth buying is a question of prices, not of this chapter.
e)
The successive gains are 69.23, 155.77, 160.71, 128.57 and 93.82 kg per hectare. The largest one is the step from 100 to 150, not the step from 50 to 100 that ends at the inflection point. A 50 kg step measures the AVERAGE marginal yield over the step, and Y′ is not symmetric about its peak: it climbs steeply before 100 and comes down slowly after it (Y′(50)≈2.56 while Y′(150)≈2.94). A table with a coarse step therefore only brackets the point of diminishing returns, somewhere between 50 and 150; the second derivative locates it exactly at 100.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 10: An epidemic curve: the day the outbreak stops accelerating, and what it predicts
7 answers to check
During an influenza outbreak, the total number of cases reported t days after the first report is modelled by the logistic function N(t)=1+49e−t/43000. The figure shows its S shape. The derivative N′(t) is the number of NEW cases per day.
The epidemic is said to be accelerating while the number of new cases per day increases, that is while N is concave up. A scientific calculator is allowed.
a) Multiply the numerator and the denominator by et/4 to show that N(t)=et/4+493000et/4. Find N(0) and limt→∞N(t).
b) Using the second form, show that N′(t)=(et/4+49)236750et/4. Deduce that N is increasing, and compute N′(0).
c) Show that N′′(t)=4(et/4+49)336750et/4(49−et/4). Find the time t∗ of the point of inflection exactly, then to the hundredth, and show that N(t∗)=1500.
d) Find the largest number of new cases per day. During which days is the epidemic accelerating?
e) Show that for every logistic function N(t)=1+Be−ktA, with A, B, k positive and B>1, the point of inflection is reached when N=2A. In another city, the daily number of new cases peaked on day 21, when the total reached 2600 cases. Predict the final size of that outbreak.
Show the solution
Answers
a)N(0)=60; N(t)→3000.
b)N′>0: increasing; N′(0)=14.7 new cases per day.
c)t∗=4ln49=8ln7≈15.57 days, N(t∗)=1500.
d)At most N′(t∗)=187.5 new cases per day; accelerating for 0≤t<t∗≈15.57.
e)Inflection when Be−kt=1, so N=2A; final size 2×2600=5200 cases.
a)
1+49e−t/43000⋅et/4et/4=et/4+49e−t/4et/43000et/4=et/4+493000et/4, since e−t/4et/4=e0=1 (a law of exponents, and the step most often skipped). N(0)=1+493000=60. As t→∞, e−t/4→0 in the first form, so N(t)→3000: the model predicts 3000 cases in total. The second form has no negative exponent, which makes the quotient rule cleaner.
b)
Quotient rule, with dtdet/4=41et/4 by the chain rule: N′(t)=(et/4+49)2750et/4(et/4+49)−3000et/4⋅41et/4. Pull out 750et/4: 750et/4[(et/4+49)−et/4]=750×49et/4=36750et/4. So N′(t)=(et/4+49)236750et/4>0: the total keeps increasing, as a total must. N′(0)=50236750=14.7 new cases per day at the start.
c)
Write E=et/4, so E′=4E. Quotient rule on (E+49)236750E: the numerator is 36750[4E(E+49)2−E⋅2(E+49)4E]=436750E(E+49)[(E+49)−2E]. Cancel one factor E+49: N′′(t)=4(E+49)336750E(49−E). Everything is positive except 49−E: N′′>0 while et/4<49 and N′′<0 after. The concavity changes when et/4=49, that is 4t=ln49, t∗=4ln49=8ln7≈15.57 days. There, N(t∗)=49+493000×49=1500.
d)
N′′ is the derivative of N′, so N′ increases before t∗ and decreases after: the daily count peaks at t∗, with N′(t∗)=98236750×49=19636750=187.5 new cases per day. The epidemic is accelerating while N is concave up, from the first report until day 15.57, so during days 0 to 15; from about the middle of day 15 on, cases still rise but the daily count falls. A report that says the epidemic is still accelerating because the total is still rising confuses N′>0 with N′′>0.
e)
Multiply by ekt: N(t)=ekt+BAekt. The same computation as in b) and c), with A, B, k in place of 3000, 49, 41, gives N′(t)=(ekt+B)2ABkekt and N′′(t)=(ekt+B)3ABk2ekt(B−ekt), which changes sign exactly when ekt=B, a time that exists and is positive since B>1. At that time N=B+BAB=2A. The epidemic stops accelerating when HALF of its final size is reached. In the other city, the peak of new cases is the inflection point, so 2A=2600 and the model predicts A=5200 cases in total. This is how the concavity of an S curve is used in practice: the peak of the daily curve, observed in real time, gives the final size before it happens.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
Something missing from this set?A type of exercise your teacher gives, a problem you are stuck on, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.
Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space.
Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.
I tutor first-year calculus at Concordia and McGill, in English or in French, in Montreal or online, and the algebra comes with it. Get in touch for a first session.