MATH 203 Calculus I • Concordia University, Montreal
Corrected exercises: one-sided limits (MATH 203)
This is the corrected exercise set for one-sided limits in MATH 203, Differential and Integral Calculus I, at Concordia University, section 2.4 of Thomas' Calculus.It covers left-hand and right-hand limits, the endpoint of a domain, absolute values, the floor and ceiling functions, and the two trigonometric limits Thomas proves in this section, limθ→0θsinθ=1 and limh→0hcosh−1=0.
What the set covers, the traps it targets
It covers left-hand and right-hand limits, the endpoint of a domain, absolute values, the floor and ceiling functions, and the two trigonometric limits Thomas proves in this section, limθ→0θsinθ=1 and limh→0hcosh−1=0.
The department's scientific calculator is allowed, but it computes no limit: every answer is argued, and the exact value is the expected form.
The thread running through the whole set: where the formula CHANGES, at a number where the inside of an absolute value vanishes, at an integer for a floor, at a junction or at an endpoint, the two sides are two different functions, and each side is computed with ITS formula. The marks are lost in the algebra that picks that formula: ∣u∣ opened with the sign of u on that side, u2=∣u∣, ⌊2x⌋ read on 2x, and the trigonometric identity that makes an angle and a denominator match.
The traps named in the solutions: giving the value f(a) as the limit, writing ∣x−3∣=x−3 on the left of 3, splitting where the inside of the absolute value does not vanish, ⌊x2⌋=⌊x⌋2 and ⌊2x⌋=2⌊x⌋, tan3x=3tanx, a half angle not halved, sin2x=sinx, 8x=8x, quoting θsinθ→1 when the angle does not tend to 0, and inventing a 00 on a side where the denominator tends to 1.
Exercise 1: Reading one-sided limits on a graph, endpoints included
18 answers to check
The figure shows the graph of a function g whose domain is [−3,5] with the number 3 removed. A full dot is a point of the graph, an empty dot is NOT on the graph. Read every answer from the figure and say which piece of the graph you read it on.
Recall (Thomas 2.4): limx→ag(x)=L if and only if limx→a−g(x)=L and limx→a+g(x)=L. At an endpoint of the domain only one side can be asked, and the two-sided limit does not exist there.
a) Find limx→−1−g(x), limx→−1+g(x), limx→−1g(x) and g(−1).
b) Find limx→1−g(x), limx→1+g(x), limx→1g(x) and g(1).
c) Find limx→3−g(x) and limx→3+g(x). Does limx→3g(x) exist? Is g(3) defined?
d) Find limx→−3+g(x) and limx→5−g(x). Does limx→5g(x) exist?
e) List the numbers a in (−3,5) at which limx→ag(x) does not exist, and the numbers at which it exists but differs from g(a).
Show the solution
Answers
a)2, 0, does not exist, and g(−1)=0
b)1, 1, 1, and g(1)=3
c)3 and 1; no limit at 3; g(3) is not defined.
d)0 and −1; no two-sided limit at the endpoint 5.
e)No limit at a=−1 and a=3; limit different from the value at a=1 only.
a)
To the left of −1 the graph is the rising parabola piece, which climbs to the EMPTY dot at height 2: limx→−1−g(x)=2. To the right of −1 the graph is the straight piece that starts at the FULL dot (−1,0): limx→−1+g(x)=0. The one-sided limits exist and differ, so limx→−1g(x) does not exist. The full dot gives g(−1)=0, which equals the right-hand limit; that does not rescue the two-sided limit, which needs the LEFT side to agree too.
b)
From the left, the straight piece runs up to the empty dot at height 1; from the right, the second parabola piece leaves from that same empty dot. So limx→1−g(x)=1=limx→1+g(x), and therefore limx→1g(x)=1. The isolated full dot at height 3 gives the value g(1)=3, a different question. Answering 3 for the limit because that dot is full is the most common reading error of the chapter: a limit reads the curve AROUND 1, never the dot AT 1.
c)
From the left the parabola piece ends at the empty dot (3,3), so limx→3−g(x)=3; from the right the line y=4−x leaves from the empty dot (3,1), so limx→3+g(x)=1. The sides differ: limx→3g(x) does not exist. Both dots are empty, so g(3) is not defined. Two separate facts: a limit may fail where the function is defined (a=−1), and exist where it is not defined (a hole); here both happen to fail.
d)
At −3 the graph only lives to the RIGHT: starting at the full dot (−3,0), limx→−3+g(x)=0. At 5 it only lives to the LEFT: the line comes down to the full dot (5,−1), so limx→5−g(x)=−1. Since g is not defined to the right of 5, there is no right-hand limit there, and in Thomas's convention the two-sided limit limx→5g(x) does not exist; the one-sided limit limx→5−g(x)=−1 is the complete answer at that endpoint. Writing limx→5+g(x)=−1 is a limit on a side where g has no values.
e)
Inside (−3,5) the graph is unbroken except at −1, 1 and 3. At a=−1 and a=3 the one-sided limits differ, so the limit does not exist. At a=1 the limit exists, equal to 1, but differs from g(1)=3. Everywhere else the limit exists and equals g(a).
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Tick the exercises you have done or want to review: a free account, no password, keeps your ticks and your right answers from one visit to the next, tells you which chapter to tackle next and lets you ask for the exercise you are missing. Create your space, an email is enough.
Exercise 2: Absolute values: open |u| with the sign of u on each side
14 answers to check
The algebraic gesture of the chapter: ∣u∣=u where u≥0 and ∣u∣=−u where u<0. Near a, if the inside u VANISHES at a, it has one sign on the left and the other on the right, so the two sides use two different formulas. If u(a)=0, the sign of u is the same on both sides and there is nothing to split.
For each limit, find both one-sided limits, then decide whether the two-sided limit exists.
a) limx→3∣x−3∣x2−9.
b) limx→1x−1∣x−1∣+x−1.
c) limx→0x2+∣x∣∣x∣.
d) limx→5/2∣2x−5∣2x2−5x.
e) limx→−3x+3∣x∣−3. Where does the inside of this absolute value vanish?
Show the solution
Answers
a)Left −6, right 6: the limit does not exist.
b)Left 0, right 2: the limit does not exist.
c)Both sides 1: the limit is 1.
d)Left −25, right 25: the limit does not exist.
e)−1 on both sides, so the limit is −1; the inside x vanishes at 0, far from −3.
a)
The inside x−3 vanishes at 3: split. Factor first, x2−9=(x−3)(x+3). For x>3, ∣x−3∣=x−3 and the quotient is x+3→6. For x<3, x−3<0, so ∣x−3∣=−(x−3) and the quotient is −(x+3)→−6. The sides differ, so limx→3∣x−3∣x2−9 does not exist. The lost marks are on the left: writing ∣x−3∣=3−x is right, writing ∣x−3∣=x−3 “because absolute values remove the minus” is not.
b)
For x>1: ∣x−1∣=x−1, the numerator is 2(x−1) and the quotient is 2. For x<1: ∣x−1∣=−(x−1), the numerator is −(x−1)+(x−1)=0, and the quotient is 0 for every x<1. So limx→1−=0 and limx→1+=2: no two-sided limit. On the left the numerator is identically 0; a student who does not simplify first sees 00 and panics.
c)
The inside x vanishes at 0, so check both sides, but first use x2=∣x∣2: for x=0, ∣x∣2+∣x∣∣x∣=∣x∣+11, which tends to 1 from either side. The limit is 1. Splitting also works: x2+xx=x+11→1 for x>0 and x2−x−x=x−1−1→1 for x<0. An absolute value is a reason to CHECK both sides, never a proof that they differ.
d)
Factor the numerator: 2x2−5x=x(2x−5). The inside 2x−5 vanishes at 25. For x>25 the quotient is x→25; for x<25 it is −x→−25. The limit does not exist. The common factor x is where the algebra goes wrong: 2x2−5x is x(2x−5), not 2x(x−5), and only the correct factorization shows the factor 2x−5 that cancels with the absolute value.
e)
The inside of ∣x∣ is x, which vanishes at 0, not at −3. Near −3, x<0 on BOTH sides, so ∣x∣=−x throughout and the quotient is x+3−x−3=−1 for x=−3 near −3. Both one-sided limits equal −1, and so does the limit. Splitting at −3 with ∣x∣=x on the right would give x+3x−3→0−6, nonsense: the side decides nothing, the sign of the inside decides everything.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 3: Floor and ceiling functions: read the formula on the right argument
14 answers to check
The greatest integer function ⌊u⌋ is the largest integer ≤u, the least integer function ⌈u⌉ the smallest integer ≥u. Both are constant between two integers and jump AT the integers, so a one-sided limit is decided by the integer interval that u, the ARGUMENT, lies in on that side.
The figure shows y=x−⌊x⌋, the fractional part of x, for −2≤x<3.
a) Find limx→2−(x−⌊x⌋), limx→2+(x−⌊x⌋) and the value at x=2. Does the two-sided limit exist?
b) Find limx→3−(⌊x⌋2−⌊x2⌋) and limx→3+(⌊x⌋2−⌊x2⌋).
c) Find limx→1−(⌈x⌉−x) and limx→1+(⌈x⌉−x).
d) Find limx→−1/2−⌊2x⌋ and limx→−1/2+⌊2x⌋. Then find limx→−1/22⌊x⌋. Are ⌊2x⌋ and 2⌊x⌋ the same function?
e) Find limx→2−⌊x⌋(x−⌊x⌋) and limx→2+⌊x⌋(x−⌊x⌋).
Show the solution
Answers
a)1 and 0; value 0 at 2; no two-sided limit.
b)Left 4−8=−4, right 9−9=0.
c)Left 0, right 1.
d)−2 and −1; limx→−1/22⌊x⌋=−2; no, ⌊2x⌋=2⌊x⌋ in general.
e)Left 1, right 0.
a)
For 1≤x<2, ⌊x⌋=1 and x−⌊x⌋=x−1→1: on the figure, the tooth climbs to the empty dot at height 1. For 2≤x<3, ⌊x⌋=2 and x−2→0: the next tooth starts at the full dot (2,0). So the left limit is 1, the right limit is 0, the value is 2−2=0, and the two-sided limit does not exist. The same happens at every integer.
b)
Left of 3, say 2.9<x<3: ⌊x⌋=2, and x2 is just BELOW 9, above 8.41, so ⌊x2⌋=8. The expression is 4−8=−4 on that whole interval, so the left limit is −4. Right of 3, 3<x<3.1: ⌊x⌋=3 and 9<x2<9.61, so ⌊x2⌋=9 and the expression is 0. The trap is to write ⌊x2⌋=⌊x⌋2=4 on the left: the floor is read on its own argument x2, which lies in [8,9), not on x.
c)
For 0<x≤1, ⌈x⌉=1, so ⌈x⌉−x=1−x→0 as x→1−. For 1<x≤2, ⌈x⌉=2, so the expression is 2−x→1 as x→1+. The ceiling jumps just AFTER each integer, the floor AT each integer; in both cases the answer comes from the interval, not from a memorized picture.
d)
The argument is 2x. As x→−21−, 2x→−1−, so 2x lies in [−2,−1) and ⌊2x⌋=−2. As x→−21+, 2x lies in [−1,0) and ⌊2x⌋=−1. For 2⌊x⌋ the argument is x, which stays in (−1,0) on both sides of −21: ⌊x⌋=−1 and 2⌊x⌋=−2, so the limit exists and equals −2. The two functions differ: at x=−41, ⌊2x⌋=⌊−21⌋=−1 while 2⌊x⌋=−2. A constant does not move out of a floor.
e)
For 1≤x<2 the product is 1⋅(x−1)→1. For 2≤x<3 it is 2(x−2)→0. Left 1, right 0: the limit at 2 does not exist. Each factor is replaced by its formula ON THAT SIDE before any limit is taken; a student who uses ⌊2⌋=2 on the left gets 2⋅1=2.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 4: The limit of sin(θ)/θ: make the angle and the denominator match
5 answers to check
Thomas 2.4 proves two limits, θ and h in RADIANS: limθ→0θsinθ=1 and limh→0hcosh−1=0. Admit them here (the second is proved in Exercise 5). They are used by REWRITING: the angle inside the sine and the quantity in the denominator must be the same, and it must tend to 0. Every factor you introduce is multiplied and divided at once, so the expression does not change.
Give each answer as an exact number, and name the limit law used on the line where you use it.
a) limx→05xsin(43x).
b) limt→0sin2t6t.
c) limx→0sin8xtan3x.
d) limx→0sinxsin4xx2.
e) limh→0sin2hcos5h−1.
Show the solution
Answers
a)203
b)3
c)83
d)41
e)0
a)
The angle is 43x, so the denominator must become 43x. Write 5x=320⋅43x: 5xsin(3x/4)=203⋅3x/4sin(3x/4). As x→0, θ=43x→0, so the quotient tends to 1 and the limit is 203 by the constant multiple rule. The algebra that costs marks is the compound fraction: dividing by 43x is multiplying by 3x4, and 51⋅43=203, not 415.
b)
This is the RECIPROCAL of the theorem. Write sin2t6t=3⋅sin2t2t=2tsin2t3. The denominator tends to 1=0, so the quotient rule applies and the limit is 13=3. The theorem is about θsinθ; its reciprocal also tends to 1, but only because the quotient rule has its permit, a sentence worth writing.
c)
First the identity tan3x=cos3xsin3x. Then match each sine with its own angle: sin8xtan3x=83⋅3xsin3x⋅sin8x8x⋅cos3x1. The three factors tend to 1, 1 and cos01=1, so the limit is 83 by the product rule. Writing tan3x=3tanx is the classic algebra slip: a constant does not come out of a trigonometric function.
d)
Split the x2 between the two sines: sinxsin4xx2=sinxx⋅sin4xx=sinxx⋅41⋅sin4x4x. Each reciprocal quotient tends to 1, so the limit is 41. The missing 4 is the whole question: sin4xx does not tend to 1, since its angle is 4x and its numerator only x.
e)
Substitution gives 00. Put the cosine quotient in the form of the theorem: sin2hcos5h−1=5hcos5h−1⋅2h5h⋅sin2h2h. As h→0: the first factor tends to 0 (angle 5h→0), the second is the constant 25, the third tends to 1. The limit is 0⋅25⋅1=0. Answering 25 treats 5hcos5h−1 as if it tended to 1: the cosine limit is 0, not 1.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 5: The identities that open trigonometric limits: half angle, double angle, Pythagoras
7 answers to check
In this chapter most trigonometric limits are lost in the algebra, not in the limit. Three identities do the work: sin2u+cos2u=1, so sin2u=(1−cosu)(1+cosu); the double angle sin2u=2sinucosu; and the half angle 1−cos2u=2sin2u, equivalently 1−cosh=2sin22h.
Recall also that u2=∣u∣, never u.
a) Using cosh−1=−2sin22h and limθ→0θsinθ=1, prove that limh→0hcosh−1=0.
b) Evaluate limx→0xsin3x1−cos6x.
c) Evaluate limx→0sin2x1−cosx.
d) Find limx→0+x1−cos2x and limx→0−x1−cos2x. Does the two-sided limit exist?
e) Evaluate limx→0x−3sinxx+sinx.
Show the solution
Answers
a)hcosh−1=−sin2h⋅h/2sin(h/2)→−0⋅1=0
b)6
c)21
d)Right 2, left −2: the limit does not exist.
e)−1
a)
The identity turns the cosine into a square of sines: hcosh−1=h−2sin2(h/2). Write h=2⋅2h to match one sine with its angle: 2⋅(h/2)−2sin2(h/2)=−sin2h⋅h/2sin(h/2). As h→0, θ=2h→0, so the second factor tends to 1, and the first tends to −sin0=0. By the product rule, the limit is 0⋅1=0. This is Thomas's own proof; the step that goes wrong on paper is h2=h/21, a compound fraction.
b)
Half angle with u=3x: 1−cos6x=2sin23x. So for x near 0, x=0, xsin3x1−cos6x=xsin3x2sin23x=x2sin3x=6⋅3xsin3x→6. The cancellation of one sin3x is legal because sin3x=0 for x near 0, x=0. Writing 1−cos6x=2sin26x (the angle not halved) gives xsin3x2sin26x, which leads nowhere.
c)
Pythagoras: sin2x=1−cos2x=(1−cosx)(1+cosx). For x near 0, x=0, cosx=1, so (1−cosx)(1+cosx)1−cosx=1+cosx1→21. No θsinθ is needed at all: the identity alone removes the 00. Recognizing a difference of squares hidden in sin2x is exactly the algebra the course's tutorials drill.
d)
Half angle: 1−cos2x=2sin2x, so 1−cos2x=2sin2x=2∣sinx∣. For 0<x<π, sinx>0 and the quotient is 2xsinx→2. For −π<x<0, sinx<0, so ∣sinx∣=−sinx and the quotient is −2xsinx→−2. The one-sided limits differ: no two-sided limit. The student who writes sin2x=sinx finds 2 on both sides and loses the question.
e)
Divide numerator and denominator by x: 1−3xsinx1+xsinx. The numerator tends to 2, the denominator to 1−3=−2=0, so the quotient rule gives −22=−1. Replacing sinx by x “because they are close” gives −2x2x=−1 here by luck, and earns nothing: the division by x followed by the theorem is the justification.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Part B: problems and reasoning (/50)
Exercise 6: Two junctions, two constants: one-sided limits that must agree
6 answers to check
Let a and b be constants, and let g(x)=3xsin(ax) for x<0, g(x)=x2+b for 0≤x≤2, and g(x)=∣x−2∣x2−x−2 for x>2.
At a junction the formula changes, so each side is computed with the formula valid on THAT side. The question is about limits only: the values g(0) and g(2) play no part.
a) Find limx→2+g(x).
b) Find limx→2−g(x) in terms of b, and the value of b for which limx→2g(x) exists.
c) Find limx→0−g(x) in terms of a, and its value when a=6. Find limx→0+g(x) in terms of b.
d) Find the value of a for which limx→0g(x) also exists, with b as in b).
e) With these values of a and b, give limx→0g(x) and limx→2g(x).
Show the solution
Answers
a)3
b)4+b; b=−1
c)3a, which is 2 for a=6; limx→0+g(x)=b
d)a=−3
e)limx→0g(x)=−1 and limx→2g(x)=3
a)
For x>2, x−2>0, so ∣x−2∣=x−2. Factor: x2−x−2=(x−2)(x+1). So g(x)=x−2(x−2)(x+1)=x+1 for x>2, and limx→2+g(x)=3. Opening the absolute value with the wrong sign, ∣x−2∣=−(x−2), gives −3; on the right of 2 the inside is POSITIVE, and the sentence saying so is the justification.
b)
For 0≤x≤2, g(x)=x2+b, a polynomial, so limx→2−g(x)=4+b. The two-sided limit at 2 exists exactly when the one-sided limits are equal: 4+b=3, so b=−1.
c)
For x<0 and a=0, 3xsin(ax)=3a⋅axsin(ax), and ax→0, so limx→0−g(x)=3a; if a=0 the piece is identically 0, which is again 3a. For a=6 the left-hand limit is 2. For x≥0 near 0, g(x)=x2+b→b. Note that the theorem is used on the LEFT side only: nothing requires x>0 in θsinθ→1, the limit is two-sided and so holds from the left.
d)
The limit at 0 exists when 3a=b=−1, so a=−3. The tempting answer a=3 comes from wanting 3xsin(ax) to look like θsinθ; with a=3 the left-hand limit is 1, which does not match the right-hand limit −1. The constants are chosen to make the SIDES agree, not to make a formula look familiar.
e)
With a=−3 and b=−1: from the left, 3xsin(−3x)=−3xsin3x→−1; from the right, x2−1→−1. So limx→0g(x)=−1. At 2: from the left x2−1→3, from the right x+1→3, so limx→2g(x)=3. The solution figure shows the three pieces meeting at (0,−1) and (2,3).
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 7: sin(θ)/θ when θ is a root, a polynomial or a shift
8 answers to check
The theorem limθ→0θsinθ=1 holds whatever θ is, provided θ→0 and θ=0 near the point: θ may be x, x−1, x2−5x. The work is to make the denominator EQUAL to that θ, by factoring or by rewriting a root.
Where θ is only defined on one side, or changes sign in an absolute value, the one-sided limits are the answer.
a) Find limx→0+xsinx. Why is only the right-hand limit asked?
b) Find limx→0+8xsin2x.
c) Find limx→1x2−1sin(x−1).
d) Find limx→02xsin(x2−5x).
e) Find limx→−2+∣x+2∣sin(x+2) and limx→−2−∣x+2∣sin(x+2). Does the two-sided limit exist?
Show the solution
Answers
a)1; x is not defined for x<0, so 0 is an endpoint of the domain.
b)21
c)21
d)−25
e)Right 1, left −1: the limit does not exist.
a)
Put θ=x. As x→0+, θ→0+ and θ>0, so θsinθ→1: the limit is 1. Only the right-hand limit makes sense because the domain of x is [0,∞): to the left of 0 the function has no values, 0 is an endpoint, and as in Exercise 1 d) the right-hand limit is the complete answer there.
b)
The angle is 2x. Rewrite the denominator in terms of it: 8x=4⋅2x=22x. So 8xsin2x=21⋅2xsin2x and, since θ=2x→0+, the limit is 21. The radical algebra is the point: 8=22, and 8x is not 8x, nor 42x.
c)
The angle is x−1, which tends to 0 as x→1. Factor the denominator to make it appear: x2−1=(x−1)(x+1). For x near 1, x=1: x2−1sin(x−1)=x−1sin(x−1)⋅x+11→1⋅21=21 by the product rule. The theorem does not need x→0; it needs the ANGLE to tend to 0.
d)
The angle is θ=x2−5x=x(x−5), which tends to 0. Supply the missing factor: 2xsin(x2−5x)=x2−5xsin(x2−5x)⋅2x−5 for x near 0 with x2−5x=0, which holds for 0<∣x∣<5. The first factor tends to 1, the second to 2−5: the limit is −25. The factorization x2−5x=x(x−5) is the whole trick, and the sign goes with it: the missing factor is x−5, not x+5, so the answer is negative. Dividing sin(x2−5x) by 2x “term by term” is not an operation.
e)
The angle x+2 tends to 0; the absolute value's inside, x+2, vanishes at −2: split. For x>−2, ∣x+2∣=x+2 and the quotient is x+2sin(x+2)→1. For x<−2, ∣x+2∣=−(x+2) and the quotient is −x+2sin(x+2)→−1. The one-sided limits differ, so the limit does not exist. The theorem is two-sided, the absolute value is not.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 8: Five statements to correct
9 answers to check
Each statement below was written by a student on a MATH 203 assignment, and each is false. Say what is wrong, give a counterexample or the correct value, and write the correct statement.
a) If limx→a−f(x)=limx→a+f(x)=L, then f(a)=L.
b) Since limθ→0θsinθ=1, we have limx→πxsinx=1.
c) At an integer n, limx→n+⌊x⌋ does not exist, because the graph jumps there.
d) x is not defined for x<0, so nothing can be said about the limit of x at 0.
e) x2=x, so limx→0−xx2=1.
Show the solution
Answers
a)False: g of Exercise 1 at 1 has both sides 1 and g(1)=3. Correct: then limx→af(x)=L.
b)False: the angle x tends to π, not 0; the limit is πsinπ=0.
c)False: limx→n+⌊x⌋=n and limx→n−⌊x⌋=n−1; only the two-sided limit fails.
d)False: limx→0+x=0, the complete answer at an endpoint.
e)False: x2=∣x∣=−x for x<0, so the limit is −1.
a)
FALSE. Equal one-sided limits say that the two-sided limit exists and equals L; they say nothing about f(a), which may be undefined or equal to anything else. The function g of Exercise 1 has limx→1−g(x)=limx→1+g(x)=1 and g(1)=3. Correct statement: if limx→a−f(x)=limx→a+f(x)=L, then limx→af(x)=L.
b)
FALSE. The theorem is about an angle that tends to 0; here x→π. Nothing is indeterminate: sinx→sinπ=0 and x→π=0, so the quotient rule gives limx→πxsinx=π0=0. Correct statement: limx→aθ(x)sinθ(x)=1 when θ(x)→0 as x→a (with θ(x)=0 near a). Before quoting the theorem, substitute: if there is no 00, there is nothing to rewrite.
c)
FALSE. For n≤x<n+1, ⌊x⌋=n, a constant, so limx→n+⌊x⌋=n. For n−1≤x<n, ⌊x⌋=n−1, so limx→n−⌊x⌋=n−1. Both one-sided limits exist; they differ, which is why the two-sided limit fails. Correct statement: at an integer n, both one-sided limits of ⌊x⌋ exist, they are n−1 and n, and limx→n⌊x⌋ does not exist. For example limx→3+⌊x⌋=3.
d)
FALSE. At 0, an endpoint of the domain [0,∞), the right-hand limit is exactly the question to ask, and limx→0+x=0: the values x get as small as we like as x decreases to 0. Correct statement (Thomas 2.4): at the left endpoint of its domain, x has a right-hand limit, limx→0+x=0, and no left-hand limit; the two-sided limit does not exist there.
e)
FALSE. A square root is never negative, so x2=∣x∣. For x<0, ∣x∣=−x and xx2=x−x=−1: limx→0−xx2=−1, while the right-hand limit is 1. Correct statement: x2=∣x∣, so xx2 is −1 for x<0 and 1 for x>0.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 9: A parking tariff by the hour or part hour: the jumps are the price
12 answers to check
A parking lot charges 4 dollars for the first hour or part of an hour, then 3 dollars for each additional hour or part of an hour, with a maximum of 20 dollars per day. Let P(t) be the price, in dollars, for a stay of t hours, 0<t≤24. The figure shows P for the first eight hours.
Recall that the ceiling ⌈t⌉ is the least integer ≥t: a stay of 2.5 hours is billed as 3 started hours.
a) Explain why P(t)=3⌈t⌉+1 for 0<t≤6, and compute P(2.5), P(3) and P(3.01).
b) Find limt→3−P(t), limt→3+P(t) and limt→3P(t). Say in words what the difference between the two one-sided limits means for a driver.
c) Find limt→6−P(t) and limt→6+P(t). Why is the jump at t=6 smaller than the others?
d) Find limt→0+P(t) and limt→24−P(t). Why is only one side asked at 0 and at 24?
e) How many numbers a in (0,24) are there at which limt→aP(t) does not exist? Does limt→7P(t) exist?
A stay of t hours is billed as ⌈t⌉ started hours: the first costs 4 dollars and each of the other ⌈t⌉−1 costs 3, so P(t)=4+3(⌈t⌉−1)=3⌈t⌉+1, as long as this stays below the cap: at t=6 it gives 19≤20, at ⌈t⌉=7 it would give 22>20. So P(2.5)=3⋅3+1=10, P(3)=3⋅3+1=10 (⌈3⌉=3: three full hours are three started hours), and P(3.01)=3⋅4+1=13. The expansion 4+3(⌈t⌉−1) is where the algebra goes wrong: 4+3⌈t⌉−3, not 4+3⌈t⌉−1.
b)
For 2<t≤3, ⌈t⌉=3 and P(t)=10, so limt→3−P(t)=10. For 3<t≤4, ⌈t⌉=4 and P(t)=13, so limt→3+P(t)=13. The sides differ: limt→3P(t) does not exist. On the figure, the step at height 10 ends with a full dot at t=3 and the next one starts with an empty dot. For a driver: leaving just before the third hour ends costs 10 dollars, leaving just after costs 13; the price does not settle near a single amount at t=3. Note that P(3)=10 equals the left-hand limit: with a ceiling the value sits on the LEFT step, the opposite of the floor function.
c)
For 5<t≤6, P(t)=3⋅6+1=19, so limt→6−P(t)=19. For t>6 the formula would give 22, above the cap, so P(t)=20 and limt→6+P(t)=20. The jump is 1 dollar instead of 3 because the daily maximum cuts the seventh started hour short. The one-sided limit on the right is read on the formula valid on the right, here the constant 20, not on 3⌈t⌉+1.
d)
For 0<t≤1, P(t)=4, so limt→0+P(t)=4: a stay of a few seconds already costs the first hour. For 6<t≤24, P(t)=20, so limt→24−P(t)=20. The model is only defined for 0<t≤24, so 0 and 24 are endpoints of the domain and only the side inside the domain is asked, as in Exercise 1 d). P(0) is not defined at all, and the limit does not need it.
e)
On each interval (n−1,n] with 1≤n≤6, P is constant, and so it is on (6,24]. Inside (0,24) the one-sided limits differ exactly at t=1,2,3,4,5 (jumps of 3 dollars) and t=6 (a jump of 1 dollar): six numbers. At t=7, P(t)=20 on both sides, so limt→7P(t)=20: the cap has removed all the later jumps.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
For you:
Exercise 10: A final exam problem: the sine over the fractional part
9 answers to check
Let F(x)=x−⌊x⌋sin(πx), defined for every real x that is not an integer. This is the shape of a last question on a MATH 203 final: one function, a floor inside it, and the limit θsinθ→1 hidden behind a shift. A calculator does not settle it; each one-sided limit must be argued.
a) Why is F undefined at every integer? Simplify F(x) on (0,1) and on (1,2), then compute F(21) and F(23).
b) Find limx→1−F(x). Is it a form 00?
c) Find limx→1+F(x), with the substitution t=x−1.
d) For an integer n, find limx→n+F(x) and limx→n−F(x), using sin(πn+πt)=(−1)nsin(πt). Give limx→2+F(x) and limx→2−F(x).
e) At which numbers does limx→aF(x) fail to exist? Find limx→−1+F(x).
Show the solution
Answers
a)x−⌊x⌋=0 at integers; F(x)=xsinπx on (0,1), x−1sinπx on (1,2); F(21)=2, F(23)=−2.
b)0; no, the denominator tends to 1.
c)−π
d)limx→n+F(x)=(−1)nπ and limx→n−F(x)=0; at 2: π and 0.
e)At every integer, and nowhere else; limx→−1+F(x)=−π.
a)
At an integer n, ⌊n⌋=n, so the denominator n−⌊n⌋ is 0. On (0,1), ⌊x⌋=0 and F(x)=xsinπx; on (1,2), ⌊x⌋=1 and F(x)=x−1sinπx. So F(21)=1/2sin(π/2)=2 and F(23)=1/2sin(3π/2)=1/2−1=−2.
b)
As x→1−, x lies in (0,1) and F(x)=xsinπx. The numerator tends to sinπ=0 and the denominator to 1=0: the quotient rule applies and the limit is 10=0. There is NO form 00 on this side, because the denominator is x−⌊x⌋=x, not x−1; the student who plugs x=1 into x−⌊x⌋ gets 0 and invents an indeterminate form that the left side never has.
c)
As x→1+, F(x)=x−1sinπx. Put t=x−1, so t→0+ and sinπx=sin(π+πt)=−sin(πt) by the addition formula. Then F(x)=−tsinπt=−π⋅πtsinπt, and since πt→0, the limit is −π. The factor π comes from matching the angle πt with the denominator t; forgetting it gives −1.
d)
Right of n: x=n+t with 0<t<1, ⌊x⌋=n and x−⌊x⌋=t. Since sin(πn+πt)=sin(πn)cos(πt)+cos(πn)sin(πt)=(−1)nsin(πt), F(x)=(−1)nπ⋅πtsinπt→(−1)nπ. Left of n: ⌊x⌋=n−1, the denominator x−n+1→1 and the numerator →sin(πn)=0, so the limit is 0, as in b). At n=2: limx→2+F(x)=π and limx→2−F(x)=0. The solution figure shows each arch starting at ±π just right of an integer and falling to 0 just left of the next one.
e)
Between two integers F is a quotient of functions with a nonzero denominator, and its limit at such a number a is F(a). At an integer n the right-hand limit is ±π=0 and the left-hand limit is 0: the sides never agree, so the limit fails at every integer and only there. At n=−1: limx→−1+F(x)=(−1)−1π=−π. A calculator at x=−0.99 gives about −3.1411, consistent with −π≈−3.1416.
Points are earned before the solution; after it, you can keep practising.
Something missing from this set?A type of exercise your teacher gives, a problem you are stuck on, a mistake you spotted: tell me, I read every request.
Sending goes through your free space: that is how I can answer you and tell you when the exercise is added. An email is enough, no password. Create your space.
Rather not create an account? Write to me directly.