MATH 203 Calculus I • Concordia University, Montreal
Revision sheet: one-sided limits (MATH 203)
This sheet is not a summary of section 2.4 of Thomas' Calculus: you already have the course notes. It answers one question only, what makes students lose marks on one-sided limits in MATH 203 at Concordia University, and which precise gesture avoids each loss.
Most of these limits are one line of calculus and three lines of algebra, and the marks go with the algebra: the sign of the inside of an absolute value on each side, the square root of a square, the argument of a floor, the identity that makes an angle match its denominator. The calculator is allowed and computes none of it; it only confirms a table of values, in radian mode.
Mark this sheet as read or add it to your favourites: a free account, no password, keeps your read sheets and favourites from one visit to the next and tells you which chapter to tackle next. Create your space, an email is enough.
The thread of the chapter
Where the formula changes (the inside of ∣u∣ vanishes, a floor meets an integer, a junction, an endpoint), the two sides are two different functions: each side is computed with ITS formula, and the marks are lost in the algebra that picks that formula.
•limx→af(x)=L if and only if limx→a−f(x)=L AND limx→a+f(x)=L. The value f(a) plays no part.
•Split into two sides only where the formula CHANGES at a: the inside of ∣u∣ vanishes at a, the argument of ⌊u⌋ or ⌈u⌉ is an integer at a, a piecewise function has a junction at a.
•∣u∣=u where u≥0, ∣u∣=−u where u<0; and u2=∣u∣, never u.
•At an endpoint of the domain only the side inside the domain exists: limx→0+x=0, and there is no two-sided limit there (Thomas 2.4).
•⌊u⌋ is constant on [n,n+1), ⌈u⌉ on (n,n+1]: read the interval of the ARGUMENT u on each side.
For ∣x−1∣x2−x the left side follows y=−x towards −1 and the right side follows y=x towards 1: two formulas, two targets, no limit at 1.
Write the sign of the inside on each side as a sentence (“for x<3, x−3<0, so ∣x−3∣=−(x−3)”): it is the line the marker is looking for.
The two trigonometric limits of Thomas 2.4, and the identities that feed them
•limθ→0θsinθ=1 and limh→0hcosh−1=0, angles in RADIANS, the angle tending to 0.
•The angle may be anything that tends to 0: 3x, x, x−1, x2−5x. The denominator must be made EQUAL to it, by multiplying and dividing by the same constant or by factoring.
•Reciprocal: sinθθ→1 too, by the quotient rule, since 1=0.
•If substitution gives no 00, there is nothing to rewrite: limx→πxsinx=π0=0.
A constant never leaves a trigonometric function or a floor: tan3x=3tanx, sin2x=2sinx, ⌊2x⌋=2⌊x⌋.
The mistakes that cost marks
These are the errors I correct most often in session. Each one costs marks on a paper, even when the reasoning behind it is right.
1.Opening an absolute value with the wrong sign on the left
the whole question
What not to write
“∣x−3∣x2−9=x−3(x−3)(x+3)=x+3, so the limit at 3 is 6.”
What to write
“For x>3, ∣x−3∣=x−3 and the quotient is x+3→6. For x<3, ∣x−3∣=−(x−3) and the quotient is −(x+3)→−6. The sides differ: the limit does not exist.”
Why: Where the inside vanishes at a, it is negative on one side. An absolute value is never “just removed”: it is opened with the sign of its inside, side by side.
2.Splitting where the inside of the absolute value does not vanish
the whole question
What not to write
“At −3, ∣x∣=x on the right and −x on the left, so x+3∣x∣−3 has two different one-sided limits.”
What to write
“Near −3, x<0 on both sides, so ∣x∣=−x and x+3∣x∣−3=x+3−x−3=−1: the limit is −1.”
Why: The split happens where the INSIDE changes sign, here at 0, not where the limit is taken. Near −3 the sign of x is fixed.
3.Taking the square root of a square without its absolute value
the whole question, often 3 marks
What not to write
“1−cosx=2sin22x, so x1−cosx=x2sin(x/2)→22.”
What to write
“2sin22x=2sin2x. For x>0 the limit is 22; for x<0, ∣sin2x∣=−sin2x and the limit is −22. No two-sided limit.”
y=x1−cosx approaches 22 from the right and −22 from the left: the root hides an absolute value.
Why: A square root is never negative, while sin2x<0 for small x<0. The absolute value hidden in u2 is what splits the sides.
4.Reading the floor of 2x on x
the whole question
What not to write
“⌊2x⌋=2⌊x⌋, and ⌊x⌋=−1 near −21, so limx→−1/2⌊2x⌋=−2.”
What to write
“The argument is 2x. For x→−21−, 2x∈[−2,−1) and ⌊2x⌋=−2; for x→−21+, 2x∈[−1,0) and ⌊2x⌋=−1. No limit.”
⌊2x⌋ (blue steps) jumps at −21 and 21, where the dashed 2⌊x⌋ stays flat: two different functions.
Why: ⌊2x⌋ jumps at every half-integer, 2⌊x⌋ only at integers. A floor is read on its own argument, as ⌊x2⌋ is read on x2.
5.Reading a one-sided limit on the value at the jump
2 marks
What not to write
“The parking price is P(3)=10 dollars, so limt→3+P(t)=10.”
What to write
“For 3<t≤4, P(t)=13, so limt→3+P(t)=13; the value P(3)=10 sits on the left step.”
Why: A right-hand limit uses only t>3. With a ceiling the value at the integer belongs to the LEFT step, with a floor to the right one: read the interval, not the dot.
6.Matching the sine with the wrong denominator
2 marks
What not to write
“5xsin(3x/4)→51, since the sine over x tends to 1.”
What to write
“5xsin(3x/4)=203⋅3x/4sin(3x/4) and 43x→0, so the limit is 203.”
Why: The theorem needs the SAME quantity in the sine and in the denominator. Dividing by 43x is multiplying by 3x4: the compound fraction is where the constant goes wrong.
7.Quoting sin(θ)/θ → 1 when the angle does not tend to 0
the whole question
What not to write
“limx→πxsinx=1, it is sine over its angle.”
What to write
“Substitution gives πsinπ=π0, no indeterminate form: by the quotient rule the limit is 0.”
Why: The theorem is about an angle tending to 0. Substitute first: without a 00 there is nothing to rewrite.
“The same rewriting, but 5hcos5h−1→0: the limit is 0⋅25⋅1=0.”
Why: Thomas 2.4 proves hcosh−1→0, not 1: it follows from cosh−1=−2sin22h, a product with a factor tending to 0.
9.Taking a limit on a side where the function has no values
1 mark
What not to write
“limx→0−x=0 and limx→0+x=0, so limx→0x=0.”
What to write
“x is defined only for x≥0: limx→0+x=0, there is no left-hand limit, and the two-sided limit does not exist at this endpoint.”
Why: A one-sided limit needs values on that side. At an endpoint, Thomas asks the one side inside the domain, and that side is the full answer.
Which method to choose
Which gesture, by the FORM of the limit
Substitute a first, on the side. What you see picks the tool
If ∣u∣ with u(a)=0 → split: ∣u∣=u on the side where u>0, −u on the other; compute both sides
Example: ∣2x−5∣2x2−5x at 25: −25 and 25, no limit
If ∣u∣ with u(a)=0 → no split: the sign of u is the same on both sides, open the absolute value once
Example: x+3∣x∣−3=−1 near −3
If u2, or a root of 1−cos → write ∣u∣ first, then treat it as an absolute value
Example: x1−cos2x: 2 and −2
If ⌊u⌋ or ⌈u⌉ with u(a) an integer → split; on each side replace the floor by the integer of the interval of u
Example: ⌊x⌋2−⌊x2⌋ at 3: −4 and 0
If a junction of a piecewise function → each side with the formula valid on that side; the value at the junction is not used
Example: x2+b on the left of 2, x+1 on the right: b=−1
If sin(angle) over something, the angle tending to 0 → multiply and divide so that the denominator equals the angle; factor it if needed
Example: 2xsin(x2−5x)→−25
If 1−cos or cos−1 in a 00 → half angle 1−cos2u=2sin2u, or Pythagoras sin2=(1−cos)(1+cos)
Example: xsin3x1−cos6x→6
If no 0/0 after substitution → done: quotient rule, no rewriting
Example: xsinx→0 at π
Infinite limits and limits at infinity are the next chapter; if a side tends to a nonzero number over 0, stop at “no finite limit” for now.
How the answer is expected to be written
A marker ticks steps. Here they are in order, with the concluding sentence expected word for word.
Proving that a limit does not exist with one-sided limits
When to use it: An absolute value whose inside vanishes at a, a floor at an integer, a junction
1Say why the sides must be separated: “the inside x−3 vanishes at 3”, or “the formula changes at 2”.
2Left side: state the sign or the interval (“for x<3, x−3<0”), write the formula valid there, take its limit.
3Right side: the same, with its own formula.
4Compare the two numbers and conclude with the reason.
Concluding sentence
“For x<3, ∣x−3∣=−(x−3), so limx→3−∣x−3∣x2−9=−6; for x>3, ∣x−3∣=x−3, so limx→3+∣x−3∣x2−9=6. The one-sided limits are different, so the limit does not exist.”
The trap: Writing “the limit does not exist because f(3) is undefined”: that is never a reason, a hole has a limit.
Marking: Typically 1 mark per one-sided limit with its sign sentence, 1 for the conclusion with its reason.
Rewriting a limit into sin(θ)/θ, written for full marks
When to use it: A sine (or a tangent) of an angle tending to 0, in a form 00
1Substitute and write the form 00.
2Name the angle θ and check that θ→0.
3Multiply and divide so that θsinθ appears, with every constant written.
4Quote the theorem, then the product or quotient rule, and conclude.
Concluding sentence
“With θ=x−1→0: x2−1sin(x−1)=x−1sin(x−1)⋅x+11→1⋅21=21, by limθ→0θsinθ=1 and the product rule.”
The trap: Cancelling the sine, as in sin8xsin3x=8x3x: the number may survive, the method mark does not.
Marking: Usually 1 mark for the rewriting, 1 for the theorem named, 1 for the value.
Check before you hand in
Five minutes of checking recover more marks than one more problem started in a hurry.
A table on each side, in radian mode
The department's scientific calculator computes no limit, but it evaluates. Take x = a - 0.001 and x = a + 0.001, in RADIAN mode, and compare with your two answers.
x1−cos2x at x=±0.001 gives about ±1.4142: two answers, as the absolute value predicts. In degree mode you get nonsense.
The sign on one side
Take x just to the left of a, read the sign of every factor. A left-hand limit cannot have the opposite sign.
∣2x−5∣2x2−5x at x=2.4: 0.2−0.48=−2.4, so the left limit is negative, near −2.5.
Substitute before quoting a theorem
If the substitution gives a number over a nonzero number, the answer is that quotient. The trigonometric limits are for 0/0 only.
xsinx at π: π0=0, not 1.
Test an identity at one angle
Before using an identity you are not sure of, try it at an easy angle.
1−cos2u=2sin2u at u=2π: 1−(−1)=2 and 2⋅1=2. The unhalved version 2sin22u gives 0: wrong.
The typical problem, taken apart
A junction with a sine on one side and an absolute value on the other
Let f(x)=4xsin(kx) for x<0, f(0)=5, and f(x)=2∣x∣x2+3x for x>0, where k is a constant.
Find k so that limx→0f(x) exists, give the limit, and compare it with f(0).
Step 1
The formula changes at 0: compute limx→0−f(x) and limx→0+f(x) separately. The value f(0)=5 is set aside.
Why
A junction forces the split. Using f(0) now would answer a different question.
Step 2
Right: for x>0, ∣x∣=x, so f(x)=2xx(x+3)=2x+3 and limx→0+f(x)=23.
Why
Saying ∣x∣=x BECAUSE x>0 is the justification; factoring x2+3x=x(x+3) is the algebra that makes the cancellation visible.
Step 3
Left: for k=0, 4xsin(kx)=4k⋅kxsin(kx) and kx→0, so limx→0−f(x)=4k (and 0=4k if k=0).
Why
The angle is kx, so the denominator is made into kx; the constant 4k is written, not guessed.
Step 4
The limit exists if and only if 4k=23, that is k=6. Then limx→0f(x)=23, while f(0)=5.
Why
The constant makes the SIDES agree; the value at 0 plays no part, and here it differs from the limit.
Step 5
Check with the calculator in radian mode: x=−0.01 gives −0.04sin(−0.06)≈1.4991; x=0.01 gives 23.01=1.505. Both are near 1.5.
Why
A value on each side catches a lost constant or a wrong sign in the absolute value at no cost.
The conclusion, written out
“With k=6, limx→0−f(x)=limx→0+f(x)=23, so limx→0f(x)=23, although f(0)=5.”
The classic mistake on this problem: Choosing k=4 so that 4xsin(kx) “looks like” θsinθ: the left limit is then 1, not 23.
Learn by heart
•limx→af(x)=L iff both one-sided limits exist and EQUAL L. The value f(a) plays no part.
•Split only where the formula changes: inside of ∣u∣ zero at a, integer argument of a floor or ceiling, junction.
•∣u∣=−u where u<0. u2=∣u∣.
•At an endpoint, only the side inside the domain exists: limx→0+x=0.
•θsinθ→1 and hcosh−1→0, radians, angle →0, same angle above and below.
•Constants never leave a function: ⌊2x⌋=2⌊x⌋, tan3x=3tanx.
Frequently asked questions
How do I find a left-hand limit with an absolute value?
Look at the inside of the absolute value just to the left of the point. If it is negative there, replace the absolute value by minus the inside; if it is positive, by the inside itself. Then simplify and take the limit of that formula. Do the same on the right with the sign that holds there, and compare the two answers.
When does a limit not exist in calculus 1?
In this chapter, a two-sided limit fails to exist when the left-hand and right-hand limits are two different numbers, or when one of them does not exist. It does not fail just because the function is undefined at the point: a hole still has a limit. At the endpoint of a domain only one side can be computed, and that one-sided limit is the answer.
Why does sin x over x tend to 1 but not when x goes to pi?
The theorem proved in Thomas section 2.4 is about an angle that tends to zero, measured in radians. When x tends to pi, the sine tends to zero but the denominator tends to pi, so there is no indeterminate form and the limit is simply zero over pi, which is zero. Always substitute first: the theorem is only needed for zero over zero.
What is the limit of the floor function at an integer?
At an integer n, the floor of x equals n minus one just to the left of n and n just to the right, so the left-hand limit is n minus one and the right-hand limit is n. Both one-sided limits exist, but they are different, so the two-sided limit does not exist. Between two integers the floor is constant and its limit is that constant.
Practise it
Corrected exercises: One-sided limits, MATH 203 at Concordia
A method is proved on a paper, not on a sheet. The set for the same chapter takes each of these traps into a problem, with the solution written out step by step.